Global Assistance and the Cascade of Malaria Prevention and Control - Sub-Saharan Africa, 2011-2022.

IF 4.3 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Junyi Shi, Minmin Wang, Adelard Kakunze, Hawa Catherine Margai, Huang Hu, Yikai Feng, Daniel Okaka, Muhammad Abdullahi Idris, Yinzi Jin, Minghui Ren
{"title":"Global Assistance and the Cascade of Malaria Prevention and Control - Sub-Saharan Africa, 2011-2022.","authors":"Junyi Shi, Minmin Wang, Adelard Kakunze, Hawa Catherine Margai, Huang Hu, Yikai Feng, Daniel Okaka, Muhammad Abdullahi Idris, Yinzi Jin, Minghui Ren","doi":"10.46234/ccdcw2025.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Approximately 70% of funding for malaria prevention and control (P&C) in Sub-Saharan Africa comes from global assistance, yet progress has stagnated over the past decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed a cascade of malaria P&C services and analyzed its coverage and quality across 26 African countries from 2011-2022. Panel analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of four major donors [the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GF), and United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF)], which account for 90% of global funding, in implementing the cascade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recommended practice coverage doubled during 2011-2016 but decreased by 10% by 2022. Unrecommended practices followed the same pattern. Total funding from 2011-2020 reached 7.15 billion USA Dollar (USD), with the USA and GF steadily contributing 94.65%, while the UK and UNICEF demonstrated notable funding reductions. Overall, the funding showed limited correlation with the cascade coverage and quality, promoting directly only the upstream measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight four key challenges: retrogression of cascade coverage since the late 2010s, persistent gaps between recommended and unrecommended practices, funding constraints, and limited direct effects of donor funding. Strengthening health system capacity at the farthest end of the cascade may provide a solution to this dilemma.</p>","PeriodicalId":69039,"journal":{"name":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","volume":"7 18","pages":"620-627"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2025.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 70% of funding for malaria prevention and control (P&C) in Sub-Saharan Africa comes from global assistance, yet progress has stagnated over the past decade.

Methods: We constructed a cascade of malaria P&C services and analyzed its coverage and quality across 26 African countries from 2011-2022. Panel analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of four major donors [the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GF), and United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF)], which account for 90% of global funding, in implementing the cascade.

Results: Recommended practice coverage doubled during 2011-2016 but decreased by 10% by 2022. Unrecommended practices followed the same pattern. Total funding from 2011-2020 reached 7.15 billion USA Dollar (USD), with the USA and GF steadily contributing 94.65%, while the UK and UNICEF demonstrated notable funding reductions. Overall, the funding showed limited correlation with the cascade coverage and quality, promoting directly only the upstream measures.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight four key challenges: retrogression of cascade coverage since the late 2010s, persistent gaps between recommended and unrecommended practices, funding constraints, and limited direct effects of donor funding. Strengthening health system capacity at the farthest end of the cascade may provide a solution to this dilemma.

2011-2022年撒哈拉以南非洲地区全球援助与疟疾防控梯级。
导言:撒哈拉以南非洲地区用于疟疾预防和控制的资金约70%来自全球援助,但在过去十年中进展停滞不前。方法:构建了非洲26个国家2011-2022年疟疾损失险服务级联,并对其覆盖率和质量进行了分析。进行了小组分析,以审查四个主要捐助国[美利坚合众国(美国)、联合王国(英国)、全球抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾基金(GF)和联合国国际儿童紧急基金(UNICEF)]的有效性,它们占全球资金的90%,在执行级联供资方面。结果:推荐实践覆盖率在2011-2016年期间翻了一番,但到2022年下降了10%。不推荐的实践遵循相同的模式。2011-2020年的资助总额为71.5亿美元,其中美国和GF稳定贡献了94.65%,而英国和联合国儿童基金会的资助明显减少。总体而言,资金与级联覆盖和质量的相关性有限,直接促进了上游措施。结论:我们的研究结果突出了四个关键挑战:自2010年代末以来级联覆盖的倒退,推荐和不推荐做法之间的持续差距,资金限制以及捐赠资金的直接影响有限。在级联最末端加强卫生系统的能力可能是解决这一困境的一个办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信