The iCARE-DM Model for Five-Year T2DM Risk Prediction in the Elderly Population from Chinese Routine Public Health Services - China, 2017-2024.

IF 4.3 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xinyue Han, Xiaotao Zhou, Huifang Yang, Qiao Deng, Wanting Feng, Yilin Teng, Yanan Wang, Jialu Yang, Yan Liu, Min Xia, Ben Zhang, Shouling Wu, Tao Zhang, Jiayuan Li
{"title":"The iCARE-DM Model for Five-Year T2DM Risk Prediction in the Elderly Population from Chinese Routine Public Health Services - China, 2017-2024.","authors":"Xinyue Han, Xiaotao Zhou, Huifang Yang, Qiao Deng, Wanting Feng, Yilin Teng, Yanan Wang, Jialu Yang, Yan Liu, Min Xia, Ben Zhang, Shouling Wu, Tao Zhang, Jiayuan Li","doi":"10.46234/ccdcw2025.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Risk assessment for high-risk populations is critical for preventing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Although China's public health services have continuously contributed to early grass-roots diagnosis of diabetes for years, universally applicable tools for identifying latent high-risk elderly populations urgently need to account for heterogeneity, robustness, and generalizability. Therefore, this study developed and validated the integrated Chinese Adapted Risk Evaluation for Diabetes Mellitus (iCARE-DM) model for elderly Chinese individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The iCARE-DM model was developed based on pooled effect estimates from a meta-analysis of cohort studies that identified T2DM risk factors in East Asian populations and validated in three multicenter Chinese populations. Predictive performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, log-rank tests, and compared with the guideline-recommended model (i.e., New Chinese Diabetes Risk Score, NCDRS) as well as four machine learning (ML) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The iCARE-DM model achieved AUC values of 0.741, 0.783, and 0.766, outperforming the NCDRS model by at least 12%. Although the best-performing ML model achieved AUC values comparable to the iCARE-DM model, its performance varied significantly across populations (with a range as high as 9%). Subgroup analyses of the iCARE-DM model confirmed consistent performance across age, gender and rural-urban groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The iCARE-DM model demonstrated higher accuracy than the NCDRS model and exhibited superior robustness and generalizability compared to the ML models. The iCARE-DM model provides a robust, culturally adapted tool for T2DM risk assessment in elderly Chinese individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":69039,"journal":{"name":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","volume":"7 19","pages":"675-682"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2025.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Risk assessment for high-risk populations is critical for preventing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Although China's public health services have continuously contributed to early grass-roots diagnosis of diabetes for years, universally applicable tools for identifying latent high-risk elderly populations urgently need to account for heterogeneity, robustness, and generalizability. Therefore, this study developed and validated the integrated Chinese Adapted Risk Evaluation for Diabetes Mellitus (iCARE-DM) model for elderly Chinese individuals.

Methods: The iCARE-DM model was developed based on pooled effect estimates from a meta-analysis of cohort studies that identified T2DM risk factors in East Asian populations and validated in three multicenter Chinese populations. Predictive performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, log-rank tests, and compared with the guideline-recommended model (i.e., New Chinese Diabetes Risk Score, NCDRS) as well as four machine learning (ML) models.

Results: The iCARE-DM model achieved AUC values of 0.741, 0.783, and 0.766, outperforming the NCDRS model by at least 12%. Although the best-performing ML model achieved AUC values comparable to the iCARE-DM model, its performance varied significantly across populations (with a range as high as 9%). Subgroup analyses of the iCARE-DM model confirmed consistent performance across age, gender and rural-urban groups.

Conclusion: The iCARE-DM model demonstrated higher accuracy than the NCDRS model and exhibited superior robustness and generalizability compared to the ML models. The iCARE-DM model provides a robust, culturally adapted tool for T2DM risk assessment in elderly Chinese individuals.

iCARE-DM模型在中国常规公共卫生服务老年人5年T2DM风险预测中的应用——中国,2017-2024
高危人群的风险评估对于预防2型糖尿病(T2DM)至关重要。尽管中国的公共卫生服务多年来一直为糖尿病的早期基层诊断做出贡献,但普遍适用的识别潜在高危老年人群的工具迫切需要考虑异质性、稳健性和普遍性。因此,本研究针对中国老年人开发并验证了中国糖尿病综合适应性风险评估(iCARE-DM)模型。方法:iCARE-DM模型是基于一项队列研究的荟萃分析的综合效应估计而建立的,该研究确定了东亚人群中T2DM的危险因素,并在三个多中心的中国人群中进行了验证。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性、准确性、log-rank检验评估预测性能,并与指南推荐的模型(即新版中国糖尿病风险评分,NCDRS)以及四种机器学习(ML)模型进行比较。结果:iCARE-DM模型的AUC值分别为0.741、0.783和0.766,优于NCDRS模型至少12%。尽管表现最好的ML模型实现了与iCARE-DM模型相当的AUC值,但其性能在不同人群中差异很大(范围高达9%)。iCARE-DM模型的亚组分析证实了不同年龄、性别和城乡群体的一致表现。结论:iCARE-DM模型比NCDRS模型具有更高的准确性,并且与ML模型相比具有更好的鲁棒性和泛化性。iCARE-DM模型为中国老年人T2DM风险评估提供了一个强大的、适应文化的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信