Comparison of Views on Aging and Self-Perceptions of Aging Between Dementia Caregivers and Noncaregivers.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Serena Sabatini, Shelbie G Turner, Blossom Stephan
{"title":"Comparison of Views on Aging and Self-Perceptions of Aging Between Dementia Caregivers and Noncaregivers.","authors":"Serena Sabatini, Shelbie G Turner, Blossom Stephan","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Positive general views on and self-perceptions of aging (SPAs) are important for active and healthy aging. This cross-sectional study compared the general views on aging and SPAs of dementia caregivers with those of noncaregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the German Aging Study comprising 190 caregivers (mean age = 65.69 years; SD = 10.11) and 4,480 noncaregivers (mean age = 68.81 years; SD = 10.49) were used. The onset of old age was used to assess general views on aging. Estimated own reachable age, felt age, attitudes toward own aging, and aging-related cognitions were used to assess SPAs. Sociodemographic variables, health conditions, and depressive symptoms were used as covariates. Unadjusted and adjusted linear regression models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Onset of old age did not differ between dementia caregivers and noncaregivers. Dementia caregivers and noncaregivers had similar felt age, attitudes toward own aging, expected own reachable age, and aging-related cognitions on physical losses, ongoing development, and self-knowledge. Compared to noncaregivers, caregivers reported lower negative aging-related cognitions on social losses (adjusted B = -0.60; 95% CI: -0.93, -0.73; standardized beta = -0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Except from aging-related cognitions on social losses, dementia caregivers and noncaregivers had similar general views on aging and SPAs. Hence, despite close contact with people who have complex conditions such as dementia, dementia caregivers may not be at greater risk of negative general views of aging and SPAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Positive general views on and self-perceptions of aging (SPAs) are important for active and healthy aging. This cross-sectional study compared the general views on aging and SPAs of dementia caregivers with those of noncaregivers.

Methods: Data from the German Aging Study comprising 190 caregivers (mean age = 65.69 years; SD = 10.11) and 4,480 noncaregivers (mean age = 68.81 years; SD = 10.49) were used. The onset of old age was used to assess general views on aging. Estimated own reachable age, felt age, attitudes toward own aging, and aging-related cognitions were used to assess SPAs. Sociodemographic variables, health conditions, and depressive symptoms were used as covariates. Unadjusted and adjusted linear regression models were used.

Results: Onset of old age did not differ between dementia caregivers and noncaregivers. Dementia caregivers and noncaregivers had similar felt age, attitudes toward own aging, expected own reachable age, and aging-related cognitions on physical losses, ongoing development, and self-knowledge. Compared to noncaregivers, caregivers reported lower negative aging-related cognitions on social losses (adjusted B = -0.60; 95% CI: -0.93, -0.73; standardized beta = -0.05).

Discussion: Except from aging-related cognitions on social losses, dementia caregivers and noncaregivers had similar general views on aging and SPAs. Hence, despite close contact with people who have complex conditions such as dementia, dementia caregivers may not be at greater risk of negative general views of aging and SPAs.

痴呆照护者与非照护者老年观及老年自我认知的比较
目的:积极的总体老龄化观和自我认知对积极健康的老龄化具有重要意义。本横断面研究比较了痴呆症照顾者与非照顾者对衰老的一般看法和对衰老的自我认知。方法:数据来自德国老龄化研究,包括190名护理人员(平均年龄= 65.69岁;SD= 10.11)和4,480名非照顾者(平均年龄= 68.81岁;SD= 10.49)。老年的开始是用来评估对衰老的一般看法。评估衰老的自我认知采用估计可及年龄、感觉年龄、对自身衰老的态度和与衰老相关的认知。社会人口变量、健康状况和抑郁症状被用作协变量。采用未调整和调整后的线性回归模型。结果:痴呆护理者和非护理者的老年发病无差异。痴呆症护理者和非护理者的感觉年龄、对自身衰老的态度、对自身可达年龄的预期以及对身体损失、持续发展和自我认识的衰老相关认知相似。与非照顾者相比,照顾者对社会损失的负面认知较低(调整后B= -0.60;95% ci: -0.93, -0.73;标准化β = -0.05)。讨论:除了对社会损失的老年认知外,痴呆护理者和非护理者对衰老的总体看法和对衰老的自我认知相似。因此,尽管与患有痴呆症等复杂疾病的人有密切接触,但痴呆症护理人员对衰老的总体负面看法和对衰老的自我认知可能不会更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信