Canadian Studies on the Effectiveness of Community Treatment Orders: An Updated Systematic Review of Quantitative Data: Études canadiennes sur l'efficacité des ordonnances de traitement en milieu communautaire : mise à jour d'un examen systématique des données quantitatives.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Steve Kisely, Mike Trott, Ravi Iyer
{"title":"Canadian Studies on the Effectiveness of Community Treatment Orders: An Updated Systematic Review of Quantitative Data: Études canadiennes sur l'efficacité des ordonnances de traitement en milieu communautaire : mise à jour d'un examen systématique des données quantitatives.","authors":"Steve Kisely, Mike Trott, Ravi Iyer","doi":"10.1177/07067437251339215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesCommunity treatment orders (CTOs) for people with severe mental illnesses are used across most of Canada. Our previous systematic review of 10 years ago found that the evidence-base was limited to small studies, with only one including controls. This review updates the evidence using studies conducted in Canada over the last decade.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for any Canadian study of outcomes following CTO placement from March 2015 to January 2025.ResultsWe identified four articles from three studies. Adding these studies to the previous search gave a total of nine articles from seven studies. None could be included in a meta-analysis. There were reductions in readmission rates and bed-days following CTO placement, while psychiatric symptom, outpatient attendance, treatment adherence participation in psychiatric services and housing all improved. In one study, perceived coercion was no greater in the CTO cases than the controls and being on an order preferable to being in hospital. However, many of the studies were small and only two included controls, of which solely one adjusted for potential confounders using either matching or adjusted analyses. The certainty of evidence was therefore rated as very low.ConclusionsThe evidence-base for the use of CTOs in Canada remains limited. This research gap contrasts with other countries that have conducted large studies using randomized or matched controls and adjusted analyses. There is a need for larger studies with more standardized reporting methods to allow for the pooling of results.Protocol Registration NumberProspectively registered with PROSPERO registration number CRD42024615480.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"7067437251339215"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437251339215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesCommunity treatment orders (CTOs) for people with severe mental illnesses are used across most of Canada. Our previous systematic review of 10 years ago found that the evidence-base was limited to small studies, with only one including controls. This review updates the evidence using studies conducted in Canada over the last decade.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for any Canadian study of outcomes following CTO placement from March 2015 to January 2025.ResultsWe identified four articles from three studies. Adding these studies to the previous search gave a total of nine articles from seven studies. None could be included in a meta-analysis. There were reductions in readmission rates and bed-days following CTO placement, while psychiatric symptom, outpatient attendance, treatment adherence participation in psychiatric services and housing all improved. In one study, perceived coercion was no greater in the CTO cases than the controls and being on an order preferable to being in hospital. However, many of the studies were small and only two included controls, of which solely one adjusted for potential confounders using either matching or adjusted analyses. The certainty of evidence was therefore rated as very low.ConclusionsThe evidence-base for the use of CTOs in Canada remains limited. This research gap contrasts with other countries that have conducted large studies using randomized or matched controls and adjusted analyses. There is a need for larger studies with more standardized reporting methods to allow for the pooling of results.Protocol Registration NumberProspectively registered with PROSPERO registration number CRD42024615480.

加拿大关于社区治疗令有效性的研究:对定量数据的最新系统综述。
目的加拿大大部分地区对严重精神疾病患者使用社区治疗令(CTOs)。我们之前对10年前的系统回顾发现,证据基础仅限于小型研究,其中只有一项包括对照研究。这篇综述更新了过去十年在加拿大进行的研究的证据。方法系统检索PubMed/Medline、Embase、CINAHL和PsycINFO,检索2015年3月至2025年1月期间加拿大关于CTO安置后结果的研究。结果:我们从三项研究中找到了四篇文章。将这些研究加到之前的搜索中,总共有来自7项研究的9篇文章。没有一个可以纳入荟萃分析。在CTO安置后,再入院率和住院天数都有所减少,而精神症状、门诊出勤率、精神科服务的治疗依从性参与和住房都有所改善。在一项研究中,在CTO的案例中,感知到的强迫并不比对照组更大,而且接受命令比住院更可取。然而,许多研究规模较小,只有两项纳入对照,其中只有一项使用匹配或调整分析对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整。因此,证据的确定性被评为非常低。结论加拿大使用CTOs的证据基础仍然有限。这一研究差距与其他使用随机或匹配对照和调整分析进行大型研究的国家形成对比。有必要进行更大规模的研究,采用更标准化的报告方法,以便汇集结果。协议注册号预期注册为PROSPERO注册号CRD42024615480。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1956, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (The CJP) has been keeping psychiatrists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 60 years. The CJP provides a forum for psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers and clinicians. The CJP includes peer-reviewed scientific articles analyzing ongoing developments in Canadian and international psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信