New-onset diabetes worsens prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after R0 resection: A multicenter study.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Peng-Jiong Liu, Zhi-Peng Zhou, Guan-Yu Wang, Shuai Xu, Wei Wang, Xiong Chen, Xiao-Dong Tan, Zhong-Hua Liu, Zhi-Ming Zhao, Yuan-Xing Gao, Xiu-Ping Zhang, Rong Liu
{"title":"New-onset diabetes worsens prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after R0 resection: A multicenter study.","authors":"Peng-Jiong Liu, Zhi-Peng Zhou, Guan-Yu Wang, Shuai Xu, Wei Wang, Xiong Chen, Xiao-Dong Tan, Zhong-Hua Liu, Zhi-Ming Zhao, Yuan-Xing Gao, Xiu-Ping Zhang, Rong Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.hbpd.2025.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increased in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), particularly in new-onset diabetes (NOD). This study aimed to analyze the effect of NOD on the outcomes of patients with PDAC after R0 resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PDAC patients from six centers in China undergoing R0 resection from 2015 to 2022 were included. Patients were categorized as long-term diabetes (LTD), NOD, or non-diabetes mellitus (non-DM) based on the timing of diagnosis relative to pancreatic resection. We compared the effects of diabetes status on perioperative and oncological outcomes of PDAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1211 patients, 602 (49.7%), 127 (10.5%), and 482 (39.8%) were in the non-DM, LTD, and NOD groups, respectively. Patients with NOD suffered from higher rates of fatty pancreas and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (both P < 0.05). When compared with the non-DM group, the NOD group had worse median overall survival (OS) (24.6 vs. 29.4 months, P < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (13.3 vs. 15.8 months, P < 0.001); and the LTD group also had worse median OS (25.2 vs. 29.4 months, P = 0.041) and RFS (13.8 vs. 15.8 months, P = 0.007) compared with non-DM group. However, there were no significant differences in survival between the NOD and the LTD groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that NOD, LTD, largest tumor size, and poor tumor differentiation were independently associated with worse OS and RFS (all P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with PDAC undergoing R0 resection experienced a higher probability of POPF in the presence of concurrent NOD. Long-term survival prognosis was worse in NOD or LTD patients than in non-DM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":55059,"journal":{"name":"Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbpd.2025.04.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increased in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), particularly in new-onset diabetes (NOD). This study aimed to analyze the effect of NOD on the outcomes of patients with PDAC after R0 resection.

Methods: PDAC patients from six centers in China undergoing R0 resection from 2015 to 2022 were included. Patients were categorized as long-term diabetes (LTD), NOD, or non-diabetes mellitus (non-DM) based on the timing of diagnosis relative to pancreatic resection. We compared the effects of diabetes status on perioperative and oncological outcomes of PDAC.

Results: Of 1211 patients, 602 (49.7%), 127 (10.5%), and 482 (39.8%) were in the non-DM, LTD, and NOD groups, respectively. Patients with NOD suffered from higher rates of fatty pancreas and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (both P < 0.05). When compared with the non-DM group, the NOD group had worse median overall survival (OS) (24.6 vs. 29.4 months, P < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (13.3 vs. 15.8 months, P < 0.001); and the LTD group also had worse median OS (25.2 vs. 29.4 months, P = 0.041) and RFS (13.8 vs. 15.8 months, P = 0.007) compared with non-DM group. However, there were no significant differences in survival between the NOD and the LTD groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that NOD, LTD, largest tumor size, and poor tumor differentiation were independently associated with worse OS and RFS (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Patients with PDAC undergoing R0 resection experienced a higher probability of POPF in the presence of concurrent NOD. Long-term survival prognosis was worse in NOD or LTD patients than in non-DM patients.

一项多中心研究表明,新发糖尿病恶化了胰腺导管腺癌患者R0切除术后的预后。
背景:糖尿病(DM)患者,特别是新发糖尿病(NOD)患者发生胰导管腺癌(PDAC)的风险增加。本研究旨在分析NOD对PDAC患者R0切除术后预后的影响。方法:纳入2015 - 2022年中国6个中心接受R0切除术的PDAC患者。根据与胰腺切除术相关的诊断时间,将患者分为长期糖尿病(LTD)、NOD或非糖尿病(non-DM)。我们比较了糖尿病状况对PDAC围手术期和肿瘤预后的影响。结果:1211例患者中,非dm组602例(49.7%),LTD组127例(10.5%),NOD组482例(39.8%)。NOD患者的脂肪性胰腺和术后胰瘘(POPF)发生率较高(P < 0.05)。与非dm组相比,NOD组的中位总生存期(OS)(24.6个月vs 29.4个月,P < 0.001)和无复发生存期(RFS)(13.3个月vs 15.8个月,P < 0.001)较差;与非dm组相比,LTD组的中位OS(25.2个月vs 29.4个月,P = 0.041)和RFS(13.8个月vs 15.8个月,P = 0.007)也较差。然而,NOD组和LTD组的生存率没有显著差异。多因素分析显示,NOD、LTD、最大肿瘤大小、肿瘤分化差与较差的OS和RFS独立相关(均P < 0.05)。结论:接受R0切除术的PDAC患者在并发NOD的情况下发生POPF的可能性更高。NOD或LTD患者的长期生存预后较非dm患者差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
152
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International (HBPD INT) (ISSN 1499-3872 / CN 33-1391/R) a bimonthly journal published by First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China. It publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases. Papers cover the medical, surgical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas under the headings Liver, Biliary, Pancreas, Transplantation, Research, Special Reports, Editorials, Review Articles, Brief Communications, Clinical Summary, Clinical Images and Case Reports. It also deals with the basic sciences and experimental work. The journal is abstracted and indexed in SCI-E, IM/MEDLINE, EMBASE/EM, CA, Scopus, ScienceDirect, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信