Predictive risk factors for meconium-related ileus requiring surgical intervention in very low birth weight infants.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Yoshinobu Tsuno, Takeshi Kumagai, Mitsuhiko Riko, Taro Goda, Yasuyuki Mitani, Takuya Sugimoto, Mina Ueda, Manabu Kawai, Daisuke Tokuhara
{"title":"Predictive risk factors for meconium-related ileus requiring surgical intervention in very low birth weight infants.","authors":"Yoshinobu Tsuno, Takeshi Kumagai, Mitsuhiko Riko, Taro Goda, Yasuyuki Mitani, Takuya Sugimoto, Mina Ueda, Manabu Kawai, Daisuke Tokuhara","doi":"10.1016/j.pedneo.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meconium-related ileus (MRI) is a serious morbidity in very low birth weight infants (VLBWI). MRI can lead to intestinal perforation, which has a poor prognosis. Treatment may involve medical or surgical approaches. Our aim was to identify the risk factors predicting surgery in VLBWI with MRI, which are not well studied. We also compared clinical factors between VLBWI treated medically versus surgically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified VLBWI with MRI who were admitted to our institution between January 2014 and December 2022. Infants were divided into those who underwent surgery and those who received conservative medical therapy. We compared various clinical factors between the groups. In each group, we calculated the ratio of maximum dilatational diameter of the intestinal tract to the maximum abdominal transverse diameter on abdominal X-rays at different time points; we called this ratio the \"MRI index\". Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we determined the MRI index cutoff value to predict surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 34 VLBWI with MRI; 9 underwent surgery and 25 responded to conservative medical therapy. The MRI index on day 0 and the maximum MRI index in the surgical group were significantly higher than those in the medical group (p = 0.036 and p < 0.001, respectively). The MRI index cutoff value to predict surgery was 0.205 (area under the curve: 0.900, sensitivity: 0.92, specificity: 0.78). Compared with the medical group, the surgical group required significantly longer to achieve enteral feeding at 100 ml/kg/day, had a longer duration of hospital stay (p = 0.003 and p = 0.038, respectively) and a significantly higher incidence of sepsis (p = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VLBWI with an MRI index ≥0.205 have a significantly high risk of requiring surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":56095,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics and Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics and Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2024.11.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Meconium-related ileus (MRI) is a serious morbidity in very low birth weight infants (VLBWI). MRI can lead to intestinal perforation, which has a poor prognosis. Treatment may involve medical or surgical approaches. Our aim was to identify the risk factors predicting surgery in VLBWI with MRI, which are not well studied. We also compared clinical factors between VLBWI treated medically versus surgically.

Methods: We identified VLBWI with MRI who were admitted to our institution between January 2014 and December 2022. Infants were divided into those who underwent surgery and those who received conservative medical therapy. We compared various clinical factors between the groups. In each group, we calculated the ratio of maximum dilatational diameter of the intestinal tract to the maximum abdominal transverse diameter on abdominal X-rays at different time points; we called this ratio the "MRI index". Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we determined the MRI index cutoff value to predict surgery.

Results: We evaluated 34 VLBWI with MRI; 9 underwent surgery and 25 responded to conservative medical therapy. The MRI index on day 0 and the maximum MRI index in the surgical group were significantly higher than those in the medical group (p = 0.036 and p < 0.001, respectively). The MRI index cutoff value to predict surgery was 0.205 (area under the curve: 0.900, sensitivity: 0.92, specificity: 0.78). Compared with the medical group, the surgical group required significantly longer to achieve enteral feeding at 100 ml/kg/day, had a longer duration of hospital stay (p = 0.003 and p = 0.038, respectively) and a significantly higher incidence of sepsis (p = 0.042).

Conclusion: VLBWI with an MRI index ≥0.205 have a significantly high risk of requiring surgery.

极低出生体重儿需要手术干预的粪相关肠梗阻的预测危险因素。
背景:粪相关肠梗阻(MRI)是极低出生体重儿(VLBWI)的一种严重发病率。MRI可导致肠穿孔,预后较差。治疗可能包括药物或手术方法。我们的目的是通过MRI确定预测VLBWI手术的危险因素,这些因素尚未得到很好的研究。我们还比较了药物治疗和手术治疗VLBWI的临床因素。方法:对2014年1月至2022年12月在我院就诊的VLBWI患者进行MRI确诊。婴儿被分为接受手术的和接受保守药物治疗的两组。我们比较了两组间的各种临床因素。在每组中,我们计算不同时间点腹部x线上肠道最大扩张直径与腹部最大横径的比值;我们称这个比率为“MRI指数”。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析,我们确定了MRI指标临界值来预测手术。结果:我们对34例VLBWI进行MRI评估;9人接受手术治疗,25人接受保守药物治疗。手术组第0天MRI指数和最大MRI指数均显著高于内科组(p = 0.036和p)。结论:MRI指数≥0.205的VLBWI需要手术的风险显著增高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Pediatrics and Neonatology is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Pediatric Association and The Society of Neonatology ROC, and is indexed in EMBASE and SCOPUS. Articles on clinical and laboratory research in pediatrics and related fields are eligible for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信