Steady or Swaying? Assessing the Reliability of the HUMAC Balance System in Athletes With Chronic Low Back Pain.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Sumbul Ansari, Saurabh Sharma
{"title":"Steady or Swaying? Assessing the Reliability of the HUMAC Balance System in Athletes With Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Sumbul Ansari, Saurabh Sharma","doi":"10.1177/19417381251334638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balance is a fundamental component of athletic performance. Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a prevalent issue in athletes, impacting performance. Balance assessment plays a crucial role in CLBP rehabilitation. Reliable techniques are essential for balance assessment. The CSMi HUMAC balance system offers promise in this regard. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the HUMAC balance system and to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC) for center of pressure (CoP) indices (sway index [SI], overall stability index [OSI], mediolateral stability index [MLSI], and anteroposterior stability index [APSI]) during squats and limits of stability (LoS) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The HUMAC balance system will demonstrate high test-retest reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) >0.80, when used to assess balance in athletes with CLBP.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Repeated measures design.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 15 athletes (aged 18-30 years) with CLBP were included. The athletes underwent assessment of balance parameters on 2 separate occasions separated by a 1-week interval. Reliability was assessed using ICC<sub>2,1</sub>, standard error of measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intrarater reliability for all CoP indices during squats and LoS tests showed excellent values (ICC, 0.84-0.98), with no significant systematic bias detected in Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HUMAC balance system is a reliable tool for assessing balance in athletes with CLBP.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The HUMAC balance system demonstrates reliability in assessing balance for athletes with CLBP. This will allow clinicians to monitor changes in balance and potentially track the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving balance.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251334638"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251334638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Balance is a fundamental component of athletic performance. Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a prevalent issue in athletes, impacting performance. Balance assessment plays a crucial role in CLBP rehabilitation. Reliable techniques are essential for balance assessment. The CSMi HUMAC balance system offers promise in this regard. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the HUMAC balance system and to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC) for center of pressure (CoP) indices (sway index [SI], overall stability index [OSI], mediolateral stability index [MLSI], and anteroposterior stability index [APSI]) during squats and limits of stability (LoS) outcomes.

Hypothesis: The HUMAC balance system will demonstrate high test-retest reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) >0.80, when used to assess balance in athletes with CLBP.

Study design: Repeated measures design.

Level of evidence: Level 4.

Methods: A total of 15 athletes (aged 18-30 years) with CLBP were included. The athletes underwent assessment of balance parameters on 2 separate occasions separated by a 1-week interval. Reliability was assessed using ICC2,1, standard error of measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman plots.

Results: Intrarater reliability for all CoP indices during squats and LoS tests showed excellent values (ICC, 0.84-0.98), with no significant systematic bias detected in Bland-Altman plots.

Conclusion: The HUMAC balance system is a reliable tool for assessing balance in athletes with CLBP.

Clinical relevance: The HUMAC balance system demonstrates reliability in assessing balance for athletes with CLBP. This will allow clinicians to monitor changes in balance and potentially track the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving balance.

平稳还是摇摆?评估慢性腰痛运动员HUMAC平衡系统的可靠性。
背景:平衡是运动表现的基本组成部分。慢性腰痛(CLBP)是运动员普遍存在的问题,影响着运动员的表现。平衡评估在CLBP康复中起着至关重要的作用。可靠的技术对平衡评估至关重要。CSMi HUMAC平衡系统在这方面提供了希望。本研究旨在评估HUMAC平衡系统的可靠性,并确定深蹲时压力中心(CoP)指数(摇摆指数[SI]、整体稳定性指数[OSI]、中外侧稳定性指数[MLSI]和前后位稳定性指数[APSI])的最小可检测变化(MDC)和稳定性极限(LoS)结果。假设:当用于评估CLBP运动员的平衡时,HUMAC平衡系统将表现出较高的重测信度,类内相关系数(ICCs)为>0.80。研究设计:重复测量设计。证据等级:四级。方法:选取15例患有CLBP的运动员,年龄18-30岁。运动员在2个不同的场合进行平衡参数评估,间隔1周。采用ICC2、1、计量标准误差(SEM)和Bland-Altman图评估信度。结果:深蹲和LoS试验中所有CoP指数的内部信度均显示出极好的值(ICC, 0.84-0.98),在Bland-Altman图中未检测到显著的系统偏倚。结论:HUMAC平衡系统是评估CLBP运动员平衡性的可靠工具。临床相关性:HUMAC平衡系统在评估CLBP运动员的平衡方面证明了可靠性。这将使临床医生能够监测平衡的变化,并可能跟踪旨在改善平衡的干预措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信