Exploring pathways to develop interprofessional identity: a moderated mediation study.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Qing He, John Ian Wilzon T Dizon, George L Tipoe, Xiaoai Shen, Fraide A Ganotice
{"title":"Exploring pathways to develop interprofessional identity: a moderated mediation study.","authors":"Qing He, John Ian Wilzon T Dizon, George L Tipoe, Xiaoai Shen, Fraide A Ganotice","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10441-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interprofessional identity (IPI) is crucial in shaping the perceptions, knowledge, and collaborative skills of health professions learners. Its development is influenced by external factors (educational and practice contexts) and internal factors (motivational beliefs and confidence). Despite its importance, a comprehensive understanding of IPI formation is limited. This study proposed a theoretical model to clarify how professional self-efficacy and motivational beliefs contribute to IPI development, moderated by learning gains and satisfaction within interprofessional education (IPE). A longitudinal study with 473 health professions students was conducted during a 3-week IPE simulation course. Data were collected at the start and end of an IPE simulation course through questionnaires assessing professional self-efficacy, motivational beliefs, IPI, and program learning gains and satisfaction at two time points in 2023. A bootstrapped moderated mediation analysis using PROCESS Macro was employed to examine the mediating role of motivational beliefs between professional self-efficacy and IPI. Additionally, the study explored whether learning gains and satisfaction moderated the link between motivational beliefs and IPI. Professional self-efficacy significantly predicted IPI, with motivational beliefs mediating this relationship. The mediation effect was strengthened by students' perceived learning gains and satisfaction with the IPE program, indicating a significant index of moderated mediation (B = 0.073, BootSE = 0.026, 95% BootCI [0.020, 0.120]). Effective IPE initiatives should enhance professional self-efficacy and motivational beliefs to develop IPI among health professions students. Creating a supportive interprofessional learning environment is essential, fostering engagement and satisfaction to build a resilient IPI, ultimately enhancing collaborative practices and patient care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10441-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interprofessional identity (IPI) is crucial in shaping the perceptions, knowledge, and collaborative skills of health professions learners. Its development is influenced by external factors (educational and practice contexts) and internal factors (motivational beliefs and confidence). Despite its importance, a comprehensive understanding of IPI formation is limited. This study proposed a theoretical model to clarify how professional self-efficacy and motivational beliefs contribute to IPI development, moderated by learning gains and satisfaction within interprofessional education (IPE). A longitudinal study with 473 health professions students was conducted during a 3-week IPE simulation course. Data were collected at the start and end of an IPE simulation course through questionnaires assessing professional self-efficacy, motivational beliefs, IPI, and program learning gains and satisfaction at two time points in 2023. A bootstrapped moderated mediation analysis using PROCESS Macro was employed to examine the mediating role of motivational beliefs between professional self-efficacy and IPI. Additionally, the study explored whether learning gains and satisfaction moderated the link between motivational beliefs and IPI. Professional self-efficacy significantly predicted IPI, with motivational beliefs mediating this relationship. The mediation effect was strengthened by students' perceived learning gains and satisfaction with the IPE program, indicating a significant index of moderated mediation (B = 0.073, BootSE = 0.026, 95% BootCI [0.020, 0.120]). Effective IPE initiatives should enhance professional self-efficacy and motivational beliefs to develop IPI among health professions students. Creating a supportive interprofessional learning environment is essential, fostering engagement and satisfaction to build a resilient IPI, ultimately enhancing collaborative practices and patient care quality.

探索发展跨职业认同的途径:一个有调节的中介研究。
跨专业认同(IPI)在塑造卫生专业学习者的认知、知识和协作技能方面至关重要。它的发展受到外部因素(教育和实践背景)和内部因素(动机信念和信心)的影响。尽管它很重要,但对IPI形成的全面理解是有限的。本研究提出了一个理论模型来阐明职业自我效能感和动机信念如何促进跨专业教育(IPE)的IPI发展,并受学习收获和学习满意度的调节。在为期三周的IPE模拟课程中,对473名卫生专业学生进行了纵向研究。数据收集在一个IPE模拟课程开始和结束时,通过问卷调查在2023年的两个时间点评估专业自我效能、动机信念、IPI和项目学习收益和满意度。采用PROCESS Macro自举调节的中介分析,考察动机信念在职业自我效能感与IPI之间的中介作用。此外,该研究还探讨了学习收益和满意度是否调节了动机信念与IPI之间的联系。职业自我效能显著预测IPI,动机信念在其中起中介作用。学生感知的学习收获和对IPE项目的满意度强化了中介效应,表明中介调节指数显著(B = 0.073, BootSE = 0.026, 95% BootCI[0.020, 0.120])。有效的国际公共教育应提高专业自我效能感和激励信念,以发展卫生专业学生的国际公共教育。创造一个支持性的跨专业学习环境至关重要,促进参与和满意度,以建立一个有弹性的IPI,最终提高协作实践和患者护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信