Appropriate semantic qualifiers increase diagnostic accuracy when using a clinical decision support system: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yasutaka Yanagita, Kiyoshi Shikino, Daiki Yokokawa, Kosuke Ishizuka, Tomoko Tsukamoto, Yu Li, Takanori Uehara, Masatomi Ikusaka
{"title":"Appropriate semantic qualifiers increase diagnostic accuracy when using a clinical decision support system: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yasutaka Yanagita, Kiyoshi Shikino, Daiki Yokokawa, Kosuke Ishizuka, Tomoko Tsukamoto, Yu Li, Takanori Uehara, Masatomi Ikusaka","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07294-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of appropriate semantic qualifiers (SQs) in the effective use of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) is not yet fully understood. Previous studies have not investigated the input. This study aimed to investigate whether the appropriateness of SQs modified the impact of CDSS on diagnostic accuracy among medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this randomized controlled trial, a total of forty-two fifth-year medical students in a clinical clerkship at Chiba University Hospital were enrolled from May to December 2020. They were divided into the CDSS (CDSS use; 22 participants) and control groups (no CDSS use; 20 participants). Students were presented with ten expert-developed case vignettes asking for SQs and a diagnosis. Three appropriate SQs were established for each case vignette. The participants were awarded one point for each SQ that was consistent with the set SQs. Those with two or more points were considered to have provided appropriate SQs. The CDSS used was the Current Decision Support<sup>Ⓡ</sup>. We evaluated diagnostic accuracy and the appropriateness of SQ differences between the CDSS and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from all 42 participants were analyzed. The CDSS and control groups provided 133 (60.5%; 220 answers) and 115 (57.5%; 200 answers) appropriate SQs, respectively. Among CDSS users, diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher with appropriate SQs compared to inappropriate SQs (χ<sup>2</sup>(1) = 4.97, p = 0.026). With appropriate SQs, diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the CDSS group compared to the control group (χ<sup>2</sup>(1) = 1.16 × 10, p < 0.001). With inappropriate SQs, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two groups (χ<sup>2</sup>(1) = 8.62 × 10<sup>-2</sup>, p = 0.769).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical students may make more accurate diagnoses using the CDSS if appropriate SQs are set. Improving students' ability to set appropriate SQs may improve the effectiveness of CDSS use.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on 24/12/2020 (Unique trial number: UMIN000042831).</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07294-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of appropriate semantic qualifiers (SQs) in the effective use of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) is not yet fully understood. Previous studies have not investigated the input. This study aimed to investigate whether the appropriateness of SQs modified the impact of CDSS on diagnostic accuracy among medical students.

Methods: For this randomized controlled trial, a total of forty-two fifth-year medical students in a clinical clerkship at Chiba University Hospital were enrolled from May to December 2020. They were divided into the CDSS (CDSS use; 22 participants) and control groups (no CDSS use; 20 participants). Students were presented with ten expert-developed case vignettes asking for SQs and a diagnosis. Three appropriate SQs were established for each case vignette. The participants were awarded one point for each SQ that was consistent with the set SQs. Those with two or more points were considered to have provided appropriate SQs. The CDSS used was the Current Decision Support. We evaluated diagnostic accuracy and the appropriateness of SQ differences between the CDSS and control groups.

Results: Data from all 42 participants were analyzed. The CDSS and control groups provided 133 (60.5%; 220 answers) and 115 (57.5%; 200 answers) appropriate SQs, respectively. Among CDSS users, diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher with appropriate SQs compared to inappropriate SQs (χ2(1) = 4.97, p = 0.026). With appropriate SQs, diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the CDSS group compared to the control group (χ2(1) = 1.16 × 10, p < 0.001). With inappropriate SQs, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two groups (χ2(1) = 8.62 × 10-2, p = 0.769).

Conclusions: Medical students may make more accurate diagnoses using the CDSS if appropriate SQs are set. Improving students' ability to set appropriate SQs may improve the effectiveness of CDSS use.

Trial registration: This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on 24/12/2020 (Unique trial number: UMIN000042831).

当使用临床决策支持系统时,适当的语义限定符增加诊断准确性:一项随机对照试验。
背景:适当的语义限定符(SQs)在有效使用临床决策支持系统(CDSS)中的作用尚未完全了解。以前的研究没有调查输入。本研究旨在探讨问题量表的适宜性是否会影响医学生的诊断准确性。方法:本随机对照试验于2020年5月至12月招募了42名在千叶大学附属医院临床实习的五年级医学生。他们被分为CDSS (CDSS使用;22名受试者)和对照组(未使用CDSS;20个参与者)。学生们被展示了10个专家开发的案例,要求SQs和诊断。为每个病例小片段建立了三个适当的SQs。参与者每回答一个与设定的问题一致的问题就得一分。得分在两分或以上的考生被认为提供了适当的质量指标。使用的CDSS是当前决策支持Ⓡ。我们评估了CDSS组和对照组之间SQ的诊断准确性和适宜性差异。结果:分析了所有42名参与者的数据。CDSS组和对照组共133例(60.5%);220个答案)和115个(57.5%;200个答案)对应的问题。在使用CDSS的人群中,使用合适的SQs的诊断准确率明显高于使用不合适的SQs的诊断准确率(χ2(1) = 4.97, p = 0.026)。经适当的标准差分析,CDSS组的诊断准确率显著高于对照组(χ2(1) = 1.16 × 10, χ2(1) = 8.62 × 10-2, p = 0.769)。结论:医学生使用CDSS进行诊断时,如果设置适当的sq,可以提高诊断的准确性。提高学生设置适当问题的能力可以提高CDSS使用的有效性。试验注册:本研究于2020年12月24日在大学医院医学信息网临床试验注册中心注册(唯一试验号:UMIN000042831)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信