From acute phase to rehabilitation: bridging the gap and improving the pathway for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases patients (Summary of a Pulmonologists' Audit - September-December 2024).
Michele Vitacca, Massimiliano Beccaria, Luca Bianchi, Paolo Ceruti, Maurizio Marvisi, Monia Betti, Michela Bezzi, Francesco Tursi
{"title":"From acute phase to rehabilitation: bridging the gap and improving the pathway for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases patients (Summary of a Pulmonologists' Audit - September-December 2024).","authors":"Michele Vitacca, Massimiliano Beccaria, Luca Bianchi, Paolo Ceruti, Maurizio Marvisi, Monia Betti, Michela Bezzi, Francesco Tursi","doi":"10.5826/mrm.2025.1023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines providing a detailed pathway for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the Italian reality is characterized by underdiagnosis, organizational disharmony, and poor adherence to treatments. COPD entails significant economic and organizational costs, including healthcare expenses, delayed diagnoses, and fragmented management. Therapeutic approaches are often non-standardized and influenced by local practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The audit presented here aims to provide suggestions to optimize COPD patient management, from the acute phase to stabilization, focusing on diagnosis, therapies, respiratory rehabilitation and follow-up, while proposing a coordinated pathway that could optimize patients and healthcare needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight specialists (1 internist and 7 pulmonologists) with extensive professional experience participated in the audit meetings. During three 4-hour sessions spread over three months, participants discussed background information, challenges and suggestions related to disease management. Topics were presented by designated leads, discussed by the group, and summarized into suggestions voted on using a Delphi-like process. Suggestions were approved if at least 75% of participants rated them above seven out of ten. The process produced a final list of shared suggestions. The audit group highlighted that the current management approach for COPD -patients-both in the stable phase and during exacerbations requiring hospital admission, discharge, and post-acute respiratory rehabilitation-remains fragmented, inconsistent, and poorly standardized. The group approved 29 improvement suggestions (21 achieved unanimous approval) across six main areas: a) The pathway for suspected or confirmed COPD patients; b) Therapy during the stable phase; c) Exacerbations/hospitalizations; d) Intensive care admissions requiring tracheostomy; e) Hospital discharge and f) Indications for respiratory rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work offers a unique pulmonologist's point of view and suggestions based on literature, best practices, and field experiences to improve collaboration among stakeholders and provide more effective care for COPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51135,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/mrm.2025.1023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines providing a detailed pathway for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the Italian reality is characterized by underdiagnosis, organizational disharmony, and poor adherence to treatments. COPD entails significant economic and organizational costs, including healthcare expenses, delayed diagnoses, and fragmented management. Therapeutic approaches are often non-standardized and influenced by local practices.
Methods: The audit presented here aims to provide suggestions to optimize COPD patient management, from the acute phase to stabilization, focusing on diagnosis, therapies, respiratory rehabilitation and follow-up, while proposing a coordinated pathway that could optimize patients and healthcare needs.
Results: Eight specialists (1 internist and 7 pulmonologists) with extensive professional experience participated in the audit meetings. During three 4-hour sessions spread over three months, participants discussed background information, challenges and suggestions related to disease management. Topics were presented by designated leads, discussed by the group, and summarized into suggestions voted on using a Delphi-like process. Suggestions were approved if at least 75% of participants rated them above seven out of ten. The process produced a final list of shared suggestions. The audit group highlighted that the current management approach for COPD -patients-both in the stable phase and during exacerbations requiring hospital admission, discharge, and post-acute respiratory rehabilitation-remains fragmented, inconsistent, and poorly standardized. The group approved 29 improvement suggestions (21 achieved unanimous approval) across six main areas: a) The pathway for suspected or confirmed COPD patients; b) Therapy during the stable phase; c) Exacerbations/hospitalizations; d) Intensive care admissions requiring tracheostomy; e) Hospital discharge and f) Indications for respiratory rehabilitation.
Conclusions: This work offers a unique pulmonologist's point of view and suggestions based on literature, best practices, and field experiences to improve collaboration among stakeholders and provide more effective care for COPD patients.
期刊介绍:
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research.
The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.