Patient and clinician perspectives of the use of driving simulators for rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Magnus Bye Blumenfeld, Joshua Simmich, Emmah Joan Doig, Trevor Russell, Megan H Ross
{"title":"Patient and clinician perspectives of the use of driving simulators for rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Magnus Bye Blumenfeld, Joshua Simmich, Emmah Joan Doig, Trevor Russell, Megan H Ross","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2503338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to resume driving is a common goal for individuals who sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Driving simulators present a potential avenue for driving rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of clinicians and individuals with lived experience of TBI about the use of modern driving simulators in clinical practice. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with nine clinicians (aged 23-57; 100% women) with 4-36 years of driving rehabilitation experience and eight individuals (aged 18-57; 62.5% women) who were 1-30 years post TBI. Focus groups and interviews were audio recorded and analysed inductively using thematic analysis. Two overarching themes were identified that encompassed participants' perspectives of the <i>Perceived benefits</i> and <i>Considerations for implementation.</i> Driving simulators were perceived by clinician and patient participants as potentially beneficial for assessing driving ability and readiness to drive, and as an additional rehabilitation tool. Implementation barriers, including cost, safety, ease of use and accessibility were identified, with some participants expressing concerns about usefulness in understanding real-world driving performance and providing false hope about return to driving for people with TBI. More research is needed to evaluate safe application, validity of simulators as an assessment tool and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2503338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to resume driving is a common goal for individuals who sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Driving simulators present a potential avenue for driving rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of clinicians and individuals with lived experience of TBI about the use of modern driving simulators in clinical practice. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with nine clinicians (aged 23-57; 100% women) with 4-36 years of driving rehabilitation experience and eight individuals (aged 18-57; 62.5% women) who were 1-30 years post TBI. Focus groups and interviews were audio recorded and analysed inductively using thematic analysis. Two overarching themes were identified that encompassed participants' perspectives of the Perceived benefits and Considerations for implementation. Driving simulators were perceived by clinician and patient participants as potentially beneficial for assessing driving ability and readiness to drive, and as an additional rehabilitation tool. Implementation barriers, including cost, safety, ease of use and accessibility were identified, with some participants expressing concerns about usefulness in understanding real-world driving performance and providing false hope about return to driving for people with TBI. More research is needed to evaluate safe application, validity of simulators as an assessment tool and effectiveness.

患者和临床医生的观点使用驾驶模拟器的康复创伤性脑损伤。
恢复驾驶能力是遭受创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的个体的共同目标。驾驶模拟器为驾驶康复提供了一条潜在的途径。本研究的目的是探讨临床医生和有创伤性脑损伤生活经验的个人在临床实践中使用现代驾驶模拟器的观点。对9名临床医生(年龄23-57岁;100%女性),4-36年驾驶康复经验,8人(18-57岁;62.5%的女性),她们在创伤性脑损伤后1-30年。对焦点小组和访谈进行录音,并采用专题分析进行归纳分析。确定了两个总体主题,其中包括与会者对预期利益和执行考虑的看法。临床医生和患者参与者认为驾驶模拟器对评估驾驶能力和驾驶准备有潜在的好处,并作为额外的康复工具。实施障碍包括成本、安全、易用性和可访问性,一些参与者表达了对理解现实驾驶性能的有效性的担忧,并为脑损伤患者提供了重返驾驶的虚假希望。需要进一步的研究来评估模拟器作为评估工具的安全性、有效性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信