Pediatric sleep movements: a review of methodologies, normative data, disease associations and research gaps.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mimi Lu, Dominic A Fitzgerald, Mark B Norman, Colin E Sullivan, Karen A Waters
{"title":"Pediatric sleep movements: a review of methodologies, normative data, disease associations and research gaps.","authors":"Mimi Lu, Dominic A Fitzgerald, Mark B Norman, Colin E Sullivan, Karen A Waters","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Restless sleep is a common complaint among children, yet its quantification and clinical significance remain poorly defined. Polysomnography (PSG), the standard diagnostic tool for sleep disorders, often fails to fully explain restlessness, even when other conditions are excluded. Measuring body movement indices, proposed as an objective marker of sleep restlessness but lacking a standardized methodology, currently has limited clinical application. Recent efforts by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) have led to consensus diagnostic criteria for restless sleep disorder (RSD) that incorporate both subjective and objective measures. We review various methodologies used to quantify body movements during sleep, including PSG with video recordings, actigraphy and less invasive 'contactless' device. Key discrepancies in measurement techniques and normative data reporting are identified. To advance the inclusion of this disorder into the clinical setting, we collated and compared studies providing normative values for sleep movements across different populations and explore their relevance to other disorders. Providing a historical perspective on how measurements sleep movement has evolved, shows how technological advancements have influenced current approaches. In this context, the consequences of restless sleep and its potential impact on neurocognitive and behavioral outcomes are then discussed. We conclude by highlighting key knowledge gaps and proposing future research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restless sleep is a common complaint among children, yet its quantification and clinical significance remain poorly defined. Polysomnography (PSG), the standard diagnostic tool for sleep disorders, often fails to fully explain restlessness, even when other conditions are excluded. Measuring body movement indices, proposed as an objective marker of sleep restlessness but lacking a standardized methodology, currently has limited clinical application. Recent efforts by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) have led to consensus diagnostic criteria for restless sleep disorder (RSD) that incorporate both subjective and objective measures. We review various methodologies used to quantify body movements during sleep, including PSG with video recordings, actigraphy and less invasive 'contactless' device. Key discrepancies in measurement techniques and normative data reporting are identified. To advance the inclusion of this disorder into the clinical setting, we collated and compared studies providing normative values for sleep movements across different populations and explore their relevance to other disorders. Providing a historical perspective on how measurements sleep movement has evolved, shows how technological advancements have influenced current approaches. In this context, the consequences of restless sleep and its potential impact on neurocognitive and behavioral outcomes are then discussed. We conclude by highlighting key knowledge gaps and proposing future research directions.

儿科睡眠运动:回顾方法,规范数据,疾病关联和研究差距。
不安的睡眠是儿童中常见的抱怨,但其量化和临床意义仍不明确。多导睡眠图(PSG)是睡眠障碍的标准诊断工具,即使排除了其他情况,也常常不能完全解释躁动。测量身体运动指标被提出作为睡眠不安的客观指标,但缺乏标准化的方法,目前临床应用有限。国际不宁腿综合征研究小组(IRLSSG)最近的努力已经导致了不宁睡眠障碍(RSD)的共识诊断标准,包括主观和客观的测量。我们回顾了用于量化睡眠期间身体运动的各种方法,包括带有视频记录的PSG、活动记录仪和侵入性较小的“非接触式”设备。确定了测量技术和规范数据报告中的关键差异。为了将这种疾病纳入临床环境,我们整理和比较了为不同人群的睡眠运动提供规范值的研究,并探讨了它们与其他疾病的相关性。提供了测量睡眠运动如何演变的历史视角,显示了技术进步如何影响当前的方法。在此背景下,本文讨论了不安睡眠的后果及其对神经认知和行为结果的潜在影响。最后,我们强调了关键的知识差距,并提出了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信