Study on the Safety and Effectiveness of Using Modified Tubular Stomach for Sideoverlap Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Zeshen Wang, Qiancheng Wang, Yuming Ju, Shiyang Jin, Pengcheng Sun, Yuzhe Wei, Guanyu Zhu, Kuan Wang
{"title":"Study on the Safety and Effectiveness of Using Modified Tubular Stomach for Sideoverlap Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy.","authors":"Zeshen Wang, Qiancheng Wang, Yuming Ju, Shiyang Jin, Pengcheng Sun, Yuzhe Wei, Guanyu Zhu, Kuan Wang","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The research on laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy has focused on effective methods of preventing reflux, few studies have focused on controlling the blood supply to the anastomosis site. Therefore, we introduced a modified approach to the vascular arch of the tubular stomach (TS) and conducted a preliminary examination of its safety and feasibility. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 37 patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy at our center from March 2021 to June 2023, and comparison of clinical and pathological data, as well as intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes, between the modified TS group (<i>n</i> = 16) and the TS group (<i>n</i> = 21). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared with the TS, the modified TS had relatively longer operative times (170.63 ± 29.88 minutes versus 166.14 ± 27.49 minutes, <i>P</i> = .64) and anastomosis times (40.44 ± 6.60 minutes versus 36.14 ± 6.72 minutes, <i>P</i> = .06), and there was no significant difference in bleeding volume between the two groups (94.38 ± 75.19 mL versus 67.62 ± 44.15 mL, <i>P</i> = .14). There were 2 cases of postoperative anastomotic-related complications ((both of which were anastomotic bleeding) in the TS. No anastomotic-related complications were observed in the modified TS. There were a total of 6 cases in the postoperative gastroscopy modified TS, including 5 cases of LA-A and 1 case of LA-B; There are 10 cases of TS, including 7 cases of LA-A and 3 cases of LA-B. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The modified TS during laparoscopic procedures is safe and feasible, decreasing to the maximal degree the potential blood supply disorders and bleeding risks at the anastomosis site while preventing reflux.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The research on laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy has focused on effective methods of preventing reflux, few studies have focused on controlling the blood supply to the anastomosis site. Therefore, we introduced a modified approach to the vascular arch of the tubular stomach (TS) and conducted a preliminary examination of its safety and feasibility. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 37 patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy at our center from March 2021 to June 2023, and comparison of clinical and pathological data, as well as intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes, between the modified TS group (n = 16) and the TS group (n = 21). Results: Compared with the TS, the modified TS had relatively longer operative times (170.63 ± 29.88 minutes versus 166.14 ± 27.49 minutes, P = .64) and anastomosis times (40.44 ± 6.60 minutes versus 36.14 ± 6.72 minutes, P = .06), and there was no significant difference in bleeding volume between the two groups (94.38 ± 75.19 mL versus 67.62 ± 44.15 mL, P = .14). There were 2 cases of postoperative anastomotic-related complications ((both of which were anastomotic bleeding) in the TS. No anastomotic-related complications were observed in the modified TS. There were a total of 6 cases in the postoperative gastroscopy modified TS, including 5 cases of LA-A and 1 case of LA-B; There are 10 cases of TS, including 7 cases of LA-A and 3 cases of LA-B. Conclusions: The modified TS during laparoscopic procedures is safe and feasible, decreasing to the maximal degree the potential blood supply disorders and bleeding risks at the anastomosis site while preventing reflux.

改良管状胃用于腹腔镜胃近端切除术侧重叠吻合的安全性和有效性研究。
背景:腹腔镜胃近端切除术的研究主要集中在防止反流的有效方法上,很少有研究关注于控制吻合部位的血供。因此,我们介绍了一种改良的管状胃血管弓入路,并对其安全性和可行性进行了初步研究。方法:回顾性分析我院2021年3月至2023年6月行腹腔镜胃近端切除术的37例患者的临床资料,比较改良TS组(n = 16)与TS组(n = 21)的临床、病理资料及术中、术后短期预后。结果:与TS相比,改良TS手术时间(170.63±29.88 min vs 166.14±27.49 min, P = 0.64)和吻合时间(40.44±6.60 min vs 36.14±6.72 min, P = 0.06)相对较长,两组出血量(94.38±75.19 mL vs 67.62±44.15 mL, P = 0.14)差异无统计学意义。TS术后吻合相关并发症2例(均为吻合口出血),改良TS术后未见吻合相关并发症,术后胃镜改良TS共6例,其中LA-A 5例,LA-B 1例;TS 10例,其中LA-A 7例,LA-B 3例。结论:改进的TS在腹腔镜手术中是安全可行的,最大程度地降低了吻合口潜在的血供障碍和出血风险,同时防止了反流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信