The cognitive benefits of ecosystem improvement: Evidence from China's National Key Ecological Function Zones.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jia Tang, Chenxu Ni, Shuwei Lu, Jie Xiong, Mingzhe Wang
{"title":"The cognitive benefits of ecosystem improvement: Evidence from China's National Key Ecological Function Zones.","authors":"Jia Tang, Chenxu Ni, Shuwei Lu, Jie Xiong, Mingzhe Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite growing evidence of a strong correlation between ecosystem changes and human health, the direct impact of ecological improvements on cognitive function remains underexplored. This study examines the impact of China's National Key Ecological Function Zones (NKEFZs) policy on residents' cognitive function, employing a staggered Difference-in-Differences model. Using large-scale longitudinal survey data from 92,825 adults, our findings indicate that NKEFZs implementation is associated with significant improvements in cognitive outcomes, with cognitive scores increasing by 0.0291 standard deviations for vocabulary, 0.0703 for mathematical scores, and 0.0993 for overall cognitive function. Further analysis reveals that these effects are mediated by enhanced objective health status, reduced depression, and increased outdoor exercise frequency. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that the cognitive benefits of NKEFZs implementation vary across demographic groups, with older and lower-income individuals experiencing less pronounced effects. These findings emphasize the broader public health implications of ecosystem improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"118149"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing evidence of a strong correlation between ecosystem changes and human health, the direct impact of ecological improvements on cognitive function remains underexplored. This study examines the impact of China's National Key Ecological Function Zones (NKEFZs) policy on residents' cognitive function, employing a staggered Difference-in-Differences model. Using large-scale longitudinal survey data from 92,825 adults, our findings indicate that NKEFZs implementation is associated with significant improvements in cognitive outcomes, with cognitive scores increasing by 0.0291 standard deviations for vocabulary, 0.0703 for mathematical scores, and 0.0993 for overall cognitive function. Further analysis reveals that these effects are mediated by enhanced objective health status, reduced depression, and increased outdoor exercise frequency. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that the cognitive benefits of NKEFZs implementation vary across demographic groups, with older and lower-income individuals experiencing less pronounced effects. These findings emphasize the broader public health implications of ecosystem improvement.

生态系统改善的认知效益:来自中国国家重点生态功能区的证据。
尽管越来越多的证据表明生态系统变化与人类健康之间存在很强的相关性,但生态改善对认知功能的直接影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究采用交错差中差模型,考察了中国国家重点生态功能区政策对居民认知功能的影响。通过对92,825名成年人的大规模纵向调查数据,我们的研究结果表明,nkefz的实施与认知结果的显著改善有关,词汇得分提高0.0291个标准差,数学得分提高0.0703个标准差,整体认知功能得分提高0.0993个标准差。进一步分析表明,这些影响是由客观健康状况的改善、抑郁的减少和户外运动频率的增加所介导的。异质性分析表明,实施nkefz的认知益处因人口统计学群体而异,老年人和低收入人群的影响不太明显。这些发现强调了生态系统改善对公共卫生的广泛影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信