External Validity for Complex Interventions: Towards Pragmatic Strategies for Evaluators.

IF 3 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Thomas Delahais
{"title":"External Validity for Complex Interventions: Towards Pragmatic Strategies for Evaluators.","authors":"Thomas Delahais","doi":"10.1177/0193841X251343130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Strategies for ensuring the generalizability of evaluation results often focus on building methodologically sound research designs. However, these strategies may fall short when the challenge lies as much in uncovering causal patterns than in applying them to uncertain contexts. This article proposes a set of pragmatic strategies to address generalizability issues in complex evaluations. These strategies address important questions such as: What needs to be generalized, for whom and for what purpose? What assumptions underlying the intervention could be generalized? How can approaches and methods be selected to support a generalization objective? How can potential users be involved to support the process of generalization? We illustrate these strategies using the example of a series of evaluations of bottom-up socio-ecological transition initiatives in France between 2013 and 2020. We suggest that these strategies can enhance policy learning and better equip policy stakeholders to navigate complex situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47533,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Review","volume":" ","pages":"193841X251343130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X251343130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strategies for ensuring the generalizability of evaluation results often focus on building methodologically sound research designs. However, these strategies may fall short when the challenge lies as much in uncovering causal patterns than in applying them to uncertain contexts. This article proposes a set of pragmatic strategies to address generalizability issues in complex evaluations. These strategies address important questions such as: What needs to be generalized, for whom and for what purpose? What assumptions underlying the intervention could be generalized? How can approaches and methods be selected to support a generalization objective? How can potential users be involved to support the process of generalization? We illustrate these strategies using the example of a series of evaluations of bottom-up socio-ecological transition initiatives in France between 2013 and 2020. We suggest that these strategies can enhance policy learning and better equip policy stakeholders to navigate complex situations.

复杂干预的外部效度:面向评估者的实用策略。
确保评价结果普遍化的战略往往侧重于建立方法学上合理的研究设计。然而,当挑战在于揭示因果模式而不是将其应用于不确定的环境时,这些策略可能会失败。本文提出了一套实用的策略来解决复杂评估中的概括性问题。这些策略解决了一些重要的问题,例如:什么需要一般化,为谁而一般化,为了什么目的?干预背后的哪些假设可以普遍化?如何选择方法和方法来支持泛化目标?如何让潜在用户参与到推广过程中来?我们以2013年至2020年间法国自下而上的社会生态转型倡议的一系列评估为例来说明这些策略。我们建议,这些战略可以加强政策学习,使政策利益相关者更好地应对复杂的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evaluation Review
Evaluation Review SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Evaluation Review is the forum for researchers, planners, and policy makers engaged in the development, implementation, and utilization of studies aimed at the betterment of the human condition. The Editors invite submission of papers reporting the findings of evaluation studies in such fields as child development, health, education, income security, manpower, mental health, criminal justice, and the physical and social environments. In addition, Evaluation Review will contain articles on methodological developments, discussions of the state of the art, and commentaries on issues related to the application of research results. Special features will include periodic review essays, "research briefs", and "craft reports".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信