Content Analysis of Maternal Toxicology Testing Policies to Inform Equity in Substance Use Disorder Identification.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Leah L Habersham, Sugy Choi, Michelle Gelband, Wendy Wilcox, Angela Bianco, Peter S Bernstein, Kima J Taylor, Nihal E Mohamed
{"title":"Content Analysis of Maternal Toxicology Testing Policies to Inform Equity in Substance Use Disorder Identification.","authors":"Leah L Habersham, Sugy Choi, Michelle Gelband, Wendy Wilcox, Angela Bianco, Peter S Bernstein, Kima J Taylor, Nihal E Mohamed","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04104-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyze existing hospital-level policies in New York City (NYC) regarding substance use and substance use disorders (SUDs) during the perinatal period to provide a comprehensive guide for hospital-level policy development, ensuring equitable maternal screening for substance use and SUDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Maternal toxicology policies were collected from eight NYC health systems between 1/1/2021 and 12/31/2022. One policy focused exclusively on neonate toxicology testing and thus was excluded. The remaining seven policies were de-identified and underwent a qualitative thematic content analysis using the Health Equity Impact Assessment framework. Two researchers conducted the thematic analysis, and two others reviewed identified themes for distinctions between policies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hospital-level policies identified four distinct policy approaches (Types A, B, C, and D). The policies varied in their approach to prenatal substance use and SUD identification, highlighting gaps in knowledge and lack of standard guidelines. The different approaches involved combinations of standardized screening tools, toxicology tests, social service referrals, and patient consent procedures, among others. Researchers found that some policies may inadvertently reinforce stigma and bias due to a focus on high-risk characteristics not necessarily indicative of substance use or SUDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multidisciplinary-informed evidence-based guidelines are needed to address substance use and SUDs during pregnancy. Our findings support the integration of evidence-based screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) into policies, and discourage sole reliance on toxicology tests for SUD identification. The study's findings can potentially guide the development of equitable and clinically useful maternal substance use and SUD policies, thereby improving dyad outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04104-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Analyze existing hospital-level policies in New York City (NYC) regarding substance use and substance use disorders (SUDs) during the perinatal period to provide a comprehensive guide for hospital-level policy development, ensuring equitable maternal screening for substance use and SUDs.

Methods: Maternal toxicology policies were collected from eight NYC health systems between 1/1/2021 and 12/31/2022. One policy focused exclusively on neonate toxicology testing and thus was excluded. The remaining seven policies were de-identified and underwent a qualitative thematic content analysis using the Health Equity Impact Assessment framework. Two researchers conducted the thematic analysis, and two others reviewed identified themes for distinctions between policies.

Results: Seven hospital-level policies identified four distinct policy approaches (Types A, B, C, and D). The policies varied in their approach to prenatal substance use and SUD identification, highlighting gaps in knowledge and lack of standard guidelines. The different approaches involved combinations of standardized screening tools, toxicology tests, social service referrals, and patient consent procedures, among others. Researchers found that some policies may inadvertently reinforce stigma and bias due to a focus on high-risk characteristics not necessarily indicative of substance use or SUDs.

Conclusion: Multidisciplinary-informed evidence-based guidelines are needed to address substance use and SUDs during pregnancy. Our findings support the integration of evidence-based screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) into policies, and discourage sole reliance on toxicology tests for SUD identification. The study's findings can potentially guide the development of equitable and clinically useful maternal substance use and SUD policies, thereby improving dyad outcomes.

为物质使用障碍鉴定提供公平信息的孕产妇毒理学检测政策内容分析。
目的:分析纽约市关于围产期物质使用和物质使用障碍(SUDs)的现有医院层面政策,为医院层面政策制定提供综合指导,确保公平的孕产妇物质使用和SUDs筛查。方法:收集纽约市8个卫生系统在2021年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间的产妇毒理学政策。一项政策专门关注新生儿毒理学测试,因此被排除在外。其余七项政策不再确定,并利用卫生公平影响评估框架进行了定性专题内容分析。两名研究人员进行了主题分析,另外两名研究人员审查了确定的主题,以区分政策之间的差异。结果:七项医院层面的政策确定了四种不同的政策方法(A、B、C和D型)。这些政策在产前物质使用和SUD鉴定方面的方法各不相同,突出了知识上的差距和缺乏标准指南。不同的方法包括标准化筛查工具、毒理学测试、社会服务转介和患者同意程序等的组合。研究人员发现,一些政策可能会无意中强化耻辱和偏见,因为它们关注的是不一定表明药物使用或sud的高风险特征。结论:需要多学科知情的循证指南来解决妊娠期间的物质使用和sud问题。我们的研究结果支持将循证筛查、短暂干预和转诊治疗(SBIRT)纳入政策,不鼓励单纯依赖毒理学测试来鉴定SUD。该研究的发现可以潜在地指导制定公平和临床有用的孕产妇物质使用和SUD政策,从而改善双重结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信