Omission of dexamethasone in prophylaxis for highly emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1124
Camilla Vieira de Rebouças, Rafaela de Brito Alves, Alayne Magalhães Trindade Domingues Yamada, Auro Del Giglio, Felipe José Silva Melo Cruz
{"title":"Omission of dexamethasone in prophylaxis for highly emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.","authors":"Camilla Vieira de Rebouças, Rafaela de Brito Alves, Alayne Magalhães Trindade Domingues Yamada, Auro Del Giglio, Felipe José Silva Melo Cruz","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A phase II study evaluated a corticosteroid-free regimen (olanzapine, netupitant, and palonosetron) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The results showed control rates comparable to those of standard protocols, demonstrating its feasibility without dexamethasone. ■ Evaluation of a corticosteroid-free antiemetic regimen. ■ Primary endpoint: 46% nausea control. ■ Secondary endpoint: 68% emesis control. ■ Comparable to standard four-drug protocols.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are highly prevalent adverse events that can lead to poor treatment adherence and a decreased quality of life. To the best of our knowledge, the complete omission of dexamethasone from any regimen for preventing nausea and vomiting has not yet been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a three-drug protocol without corticosteroids for preventing nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-arm, phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine, netupitant, and palonosetron in controlling nausea and vomiting induced by emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients were assigned to receive olanzapine on days 1-5 and netupitant and palonosetron on day 1. No corticosteroids were administered. The primary endpoint was complete nausea control during the first 5 days after chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included complete emesis control (no emesis and no use of rescue medication) and overall complete control (no emesis, no rescue medication, and no nausea).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The complete nausea control rate was 46% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.32-0.59). The emesis control rate was 68% (95%CI= 0.55-0.80), and the overall control rate was 46% (95%CI= 0.32-0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that omitting dexamethasone in highly emetogenic chemotherapy is feasible and results in nausea and vomiting control rates similar to those of the standard four-drug protocol. However, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"23 ","pages":"eAO1124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A phase II study evaluated a corticosteroid-free regimen (olanzapine, netupitant, and palonosetron) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The results showed control rates comparable to those of standard protocols, demonstrating its feasibility without dexamethasone. ■ Evaluation of a corticosteroid-free antiemetic regimen. ■ Primary endpoint: 46% nausea control. ■ Secondary endpoint: 68% emesis control. ■ Comparable to standard four-drug protocols.

Objective: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are highly prevalent adverse events that can lead to poor treatment adherence and a decreased quality of life. To the best of our knowledge, the complete omission of dexamethasone from any regimen for preventing nausea and vomiting has not yet been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a three-drug protocol without corticosteroids for preventing nausea and vomiting.

Methods: This prospective, single-arm, phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine, netupitant, and palonosetron in controlling nausea and vomiting induced by emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients were assigned to receive olanzapine on days 1-5 and netupitant and palonosetron on day 1. No corticosteroids were administered. The primary endpoint was complete nausea control during the first 5 days after chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included complete emesis control (no emesis and no use of rescue medication) and overall complete control (no emesis, no rescue medication, and no nausea).

Results: The complete nausea control rate was 46% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.32-0.59). The emesis control rate was 68% (95%CI= 0.55-0.80), and the overall control rate was 46% (95%CI= 0.32-0.59).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that omitting dexamethasone in highly emetogenic chemotherapy is feasible and results in nausea and vomiting control rates similar to those of the standard four-drug protocol. However, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this hypothesis.

乳腺癌患者高度致吐性化疗预防中地塞米松的遗漏。
背景:一项II期研究评估了无皮质类固醇方案(奥氮平、奈吡坦和帕洛诺司琼)治疗化疗引起的恶心和呕吐。结果显示控制率与标准方案相当,证明了不使用地塞米松的可行性。■无皮质类固醇止吐方案的评估。■主要终点:46%的恶心控制。次要终点:68%的呕吐控制。■与标准的四药方案相当。目的:化疗引起的恶心和呕吐是非常普遍的不良事件,可导致治疗依从性差和生活质量下降。据我们所知,在任何预防恶心和呕吐的治疗方案中完全不使用地塞米松尚未得到评估。本研究旨在评估不含皮质类固醇的三药方案预防恶心和呕吐的疗效。方法:这项前瞻性、单组、II期研究旨在评估奥氮平、尼妥吡坦和帕洛诺司琼控制致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效。患者在第1-5天接受奥氮平治疗,第1天接受奈吡坦和帕洛诺司琼治疗。没有使用皮质类固醇。主要终点是化疗后5天恶心完全控制。次要终点包括完全呕吐控制(无呕吐和未使用抢救药物)和总体完全控制(无呕吐、无抢救药物和无恶心)。结果:恶心完全控制率为46%(95%可信区间[95% ci] 0.32-0.59)。呕吐控制率为68% (95%CI= 0.55 ~ 0.80),总体控制率为46% (95%CI= 0.32 ~ 0.59)。结论:这些结果表明,在高致吐性化疗中不使用地塞米松是可行的,其恶心和呕吐控制率与标准的四药方案相似。然而,需要随机对照试验来证实这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信