Assessment of multilingual children by Western Australian speech-language pathologists: A survey of practices, barriers and facilitators.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Emily Frances Hunt, Charn Nang, Suzanne Jacqueline Meldrum, Elizabeth Armstrong
{"title":"Assessment of multilingual children by Western Australian speech-language pathologists: A survey of practices, barriers and facilitators.","authors":"Emily Frances Hunt, Charn Nang, Suzanne Jacqueline Meldrum, Elizabeth Armstrong","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2025.2499516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the past decade, diagnostic criteria for developmental language disorder, guidelines for assessment of multilingual children, and reviews of the diagnostic utility of dynamic assessment have been published. It is unknown how Australian speech-language pathologists currently assess multilingual children or how local factors influence assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-method anonymous online survey of Western Australian speech-language pathologists explored the frequency and perceived usefulness of assessment practices recommended for multilingual children, elements of dynamic assessment used, and the utility of specific client factors for diagnosis. Confidence ratings and descriptions of barriers and facilitators that affect assessment of multilingual children were also collected.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Nineteen speech-language pathologists completed the survey. Over 90% used case/family history and norm-referenced assessments. They most strongly valued case history and family interviews, but fewer valued language processing tasks or language sample analysis. Over three quarters performed dynamic assessment with varying elements included. Two-thirds were confident to assess multilingual children. Interpreter access, availability of specific assessments, supportive networks, and professional development influenced assessment accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The speech-language pathologists in this study combine data from various sources to assess multilingual children for developmental language disorder. Increased access to interpreter services, professional development, and additional time and resources may improve services.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2025.2499516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In the past decade, diagnostic criteria for developmental language disorder, guidelines for assessment of multilingual children, and reviews of the diagnostic utility of dynamic assessment have been published. It is unknown how Australian speech-language pathologists currently assess multilingual children or how local factors influence assessment.

Method: A mixed-method anonymous online survey of Western Australian speech-language pathologists explored the frequency and perceived usefulness of assessment practices recommended for multilingual children, elements of dynamic assessment used, and the utility of specific client factors for diagnosis. Confidence ratings and descriptions of barriers and facilitators that affect assessment of multilingual children were also collected.

Result: Nineteen speech-language pathologists completed the survey. Over 90% used case/family history and norm-referenced assessments. They most strongly valued case history and family interviews, but fewer valued language processing tasks or language sample analysis. Over three quarters performed dynamic assessment with varying elements included. Two-thirds were confident to assess multilingual children. Interpreter access, availability of specific assessments, supportive networks, and professional development influenced assessment accuracy.

Conclusion: The speech-language pathologists in this study combine data from various sources to assess multilingual children for developmental language disorder. Increased access to interpreter services, professional development, and additional time and resources may improve services.

西澳大利亚语言病理学家对多语言儿童的评估:对实践、障碍和促进因素的调查。
目的:在过去的十年中,已经发表了发展性语言障碍的诊断标准,多语言儿童的评估指南,以及动态评估的诊断效用的综述。目前尚不清楚澳大利亚语言病理学家如何评估多语言儿童,也不知道当地因素如何影响评估。方法:对西澳大利亚语言病理学家进行了一项混合方法的匿名在线调查,探讨了推荐给多语言儿童的评估实践的频率和感知有用性,所使用的动态评估要素,以及用于诊断的特定客户因素的效用。还收集了影响多语儿童评估的信心评级和障碍和促进因素的描述。结果:19名语言病理学家完成了调查。超过90%的用例/家族史和规范参考评估。他们最重视的是案例历史和家庭访谈,而较少重视语言处理任务或语言样本分析。超过四分之三的人进行了包括不同元素的动态评估。三分之二的人有信心评估多语言儿童。口译人员的使用、具体评估的可用性、支持网络和专业发展都会影响评估的准确性。结论:本研究中的语言病理学家综合了各种来源的数据来评估多语儿童的发展性语言障碍。增加获得口译服务的机会,专业发展,以及额外的时间和资源可能会改善服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信