Assessing Courseware: Insights From Medical Students on Textbook Efficacy in Palestinian Medical Contexts.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Abedalkarim Ayyoub, Oqab Jabali, Firas Daraghmih, Shaden Jabali
{"title":"Assessing Courseware: Insights From Medical Students on Textbook Efficacy in Palestinian Medical Contexts.","authors":"Abedalkarim Ayyoub, Oqab Jabali, Firas Daraghmih, Shaden Jabali","doi":"10.1177/23821205251342099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the medical textbook <i>Good Practice: Communication Skills in English for the Medical Practitioner</i> in enhancing language learning and teaching among medical students in a Palestinian context. It specifically assessed the textbook's content alignment, task appropriateness, grammar and vocabulary clarity, and the availability of Supplemental materials, addressing the research gap in evaluating the effectiveness of medical textbooks for language learning and communication skill development in nonnative English-speaking medical students, particularly in Palestine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 216 medical students at a Palestinian university using a structured questionnaire. The survey, originally comprising 26 items, was refined to 13 items following measurement scale and factor loading analysis. The refined items focused on three core dimensions: communication proficiency (COM), content and features (CON), and language clarity (LAC). Statistical analysis explored the relationships between these dimensions and examined the moderating effects of gender and academic level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed significant positive relationships between textbook content and communication proficiency and between communication proficiency and language clarity. Gender significantly moderated the relationship between communication proficiency and language clarity, with female students demonstrating higher acceptance rates. However, the academic level showed no significant moderating effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the critical role of comprehensive content, effective communication strategies, and clear language in medical textbooks. It emphasizes the need to consider gender-based communication preferences and sociocultural factors when developing and assessing educational materials for medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251342099"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251342099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the medical textbook Good Practice: Communication Skills in English for the Medical Practitioner in enhancing language learning and teaching among medical students in a Palestinian context. It specifically assessed the textbook's content alignment, task appropriateness, grammar and vocabulary clarity, and the availability of Supplemental materials, addressing the research gap in evaluating the effectiveness of medical textbooks for language learning and communication skill development in nonnative English-speaking medical students, particularly in Palestine.

Methods: Data were collected from 216 medical students at a Palestinian university using a structured questionnaire. The survey, originally comprising 26 items, was refined to 13 items following measurement scale and factor loading analysis. The refined items focused on three core dimensions: communication proficiency (COM), content and features (CON), and language clarity (LAC). Statistical analysis explored the relationships between these dimensions and examined the moderating effects of gender and academic level.

Results: The findings revealed significant positive relationships between textbook content and communication proficiency and between communication proficiency and language clarity. Gender significantly moderated the relationship between communication proficiency and language clarity, with female students demonstrating higher acceptance rates. However, the academic level showed no significant moderating effect.

Conclusion: The study highlights the critical role of comprehensive content, effective communication strategies, and clear language in medical textbooks. It emphasizes the need to consider gender-based communication preferences and sociocultural factors when developing and assessing educational materials for medical students.

评估课件:医学学生对巴勒斯坦医学背景下教科书效果的见解。
目的:本研究旨在评估医学教科书《良好做法:医生英语沟通技巧》在巴勒斯坦背景下加强医学生语言学习和教学方面的效果。它特别评估了教科书的内容一致性、任务适当性、语法和词汇清晰度以及补充材料的可用性,解决了在评估医学教科书对非英语母语医科学生(特别是巴勒斯坦的医科学生)语言学习和沟通技能发展的有效性方面的研究空白。方法:采用结构化问卷对巴勒斯坦某大学216名医学生进行调查。问卷调查由原来的26个项目,经过量表和因子负荷分析,精简为13个项目。改进的项目集中在三个核心维度:沟通能力(COM),内容和特征(CON)和语言清晰度(LAC)。统计分析探讨了这些维度之间的关系,并检验了性别和学术水平的调节作用。结果:教科书内容与沟通能力、沟通能力与语言清晰度之间存在显著正相关。性别显著调节了沟通能力和语言清晰度之间的关系,女生的录取率更高。然而,学术水平没有显著的调节作用。结论:本研究突出了医学教科书内容全面、沟通策略有效、语言清晰的重要性。它强调,在为医科学生编写和评估教育材料时,需要考虑基于性别的交流偏好和社会文化因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信