Sex disparities in health of older adults in India: assessing the morbidity-mortality paradox through disability-free life expectancy.

IF 2.1 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Genus Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1186/s41118-025-00247-2
Sadanand Karun, Lotus McDougal, Abhishek Singh
{"title":"Sex disparities in health of older adults in India: assessing the morbidity-mortality paradox through disability-free life expectancy.","authors":"Sadanand Karun, Lotus McDougal, Abhishek Singh","doi":"10.1186/s41118-025-00247-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults face substantial sex gaps in health. In many contexts, females live longer than males, but their time spent with disability is also higher. Our study assesses (i) the sex gap (female-male) in health through life expectancy and healthy life expectancy and (ii) the morbidity-mortality paradox among older adults aged 60 and above in India and its states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data on age-specific death rates obtained from the Sample Registration System and age-specific disability prevalence from the Longitudinal Ageing Survey (LASI) in India. We estimated abridged life tables between age groups 60-64 to 85 + using Greville's method. We then combined the disability data obtained from LASI with the constructed life tables using Sullivan's method to estimate disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) and life expectancy with disability (DLE). Finally, we decomposed the sex gap in DFLE and DLE into mortality and disability components using a stepwise replacement decomposition method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the national level, life expectancy at age 60 for males were 17.4 years and for females 19.2 years, indicating a female mortality advantage of 1.8 years. At the state level, the sex gap ranged between 5.1 years in Jammu & Kashmir and -1.1 years in Jharkhand. The disability prevalence was higher among females compared to males at the national level and in all states. The decomposition result indicates that 98% of the mortality advantage of females at the national level was spent in disability. The disability disadvantage of females over their mortality advantage was highest in Uttar Pradesh; 93% of additional years of life were spent with disability. The disability disadvantage of females over their mortality advantage was lowest in Rajasthan where only 9% of additional years were spent in disability. Stepwise replacement decomposition of the sex gap in DFLE by age groups shows that as age increases, the contribution of mortality effects decreases, whereas disability effects increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We find evidence of a morbidity-mortality paradox in India nationally and sub-nationally. As the sex gap in health and its implications vary across the states of India, policies to address these inequities must also vary across the states.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41118-025-00247-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":35741,"journal":{"name":"Genus","volume":"81 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-025-00247-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older adults face substantial sex gaps in health. In many contexts, females live longer than males, but their time spent with disability is also higher. Our study assesses (i) the sex gap (female-male) in health through life expectancy and healthy life expectancy and (ii) the morbidity-mortality paradox among older adults aged 60 and above in India and its states.

Methods: We utilized data on age-specific death rates obtained from the Sample Registration System and age-specific disability prevalence from the Longitudinal Ageing Survey (LASI) in India. We estimated abridged life tables between age groups 60-64 to 85 + using Greville's method. We then combined the disability data obtained from LASI with the constructed life tables using Sullivan's method to estimate disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) and life expectancy with disability (DLE). Finally, we decomposed the sex gap in DFLE and DLE into mortality and disability components using a stepwise replacement decomposition method.

Results: At the national level, life expectancy at age 60 for males were 17.4 years and for females 19.2 years, indicating a female mortality advantage of 1.8 years. At the state level, the sex gap ranged between 5.1 years in Jammu & Kashmir and -1.1 years in Jharkhand. The disability prevalence was higher among females compared to males at the national level and in all states. The decomposition result indicates that 98% of the mortality advantage of females at the national level was spent in disability. The disability disadvantage of females over their mortality advantage was highest in Uttar Pradesh; 93% of additional years of life were spent with disability. The disability disadvantage of females over their mortality advantage was lowest in Rajasthan where only 9% of additional years were spent in disability. Stepwise replacement decomposition of the sex gap in DFLE by age groups shows that as age increases, the contribution of mortality effects decreases, whereas disability effects increase.

Conclusions: We find evidence of a morbidity-mortality paradox in India nationally and sub-nationally. As the sex gap in health and its implications vary across the states of India, policies to address these inequities must also vary across the states.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41118-025-00247-2.

印度老年人健康方面的性别差异:通过无残疾预期寿命评估发病率-死亡率悖论。
背景:老年人在健康方面面临着巨大的性别差距。在许多情况下,女性比男性寿命更长,但她们与残疾共处的时间也更长。我们的研究通过预期寿命和健康预期寿命评估了(i)健康方面的性别差距(男女),以及(ii)印度及其各邦60岁及以上老年人的发病率-死亡率悖论。方法:我们利用来自样本登记系统的年龄特异性死亡率数据和来自印度纵向老龄化调查(LASI)的年龄特异性残疾患病率数据。我们使用格雷维尔的方法估计了60-64岁至85岁以上年龄组的缩短寿命表。然后,我们将LASI获得的残疾数据与构建的生命表结合使用Sullivan的方法来估计无残疾预期寿命(dflle)和有残疾预期寿命(DLE)。最后,采用逐步替代分解方法将dflle和DLE的性别差异分解为死亡率和残疾成分。结果:在全国范围内,60岁男性的预期寿命为17.4岁,女性为19.2岁,这表明女性死亡率比男性高1.8岁。在邦一级,性别差距在查谟和克什米尔的5.1岁和贾坎德邦的-1.1岁之间。在全国和所有州,女性的残疾患病率高于男性。分解结果表明,在全国范围内,女性死亡率优势的98%用于残疾。在北方邦,女性的残疾劣势超过死亡率优势的比例最高;93%的额外寿命是在残疾中度过的。在拉贾斯坦邦,女性的残疾劣势相对于她们的死亡率优势是最低的,只有9%的额外年数用于残疾。对DFLE中各年龄组性别差距的逐步替代分解表明,随着年龄的增加,死亡率效应的贡献减少,而残疾效应的贡献增加。结论:我们在印度全国和次全国范围内发现了发病率-死亡率悖论的证据。由于印度各邦在健康方面的性别差距及其影响各不相同,解决这些不平等的政策也必须在各邦之间有所不同。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1186/s41118-025-00247-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genus
Genus Social Sciences-Demography
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信