Scientific evolution of robotic surgery in urogenital diseases: bibliometric analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Camilo Andrés Giedelman Cuevas, Gonzalo Andrés Domínguez Alvarado, Claudia Jaimes González, Carlos Felipe Palomino Peña, Luis Eduardo Cavelier Castro
{"title":"Scientific evolution of robotic surgery in urogenital diseases: bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Camilo Andrés Giedelman Cuevas, Gonzalo Andrés Domínguez Alvarado, Claudia Jaimes González, Carlos Felipe Palomino Peña, Luis Eduardo Cavelier Castro","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02359-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic surgery has revolutionized modern medicine, particularly in urology, by enhancing surgical precision through advanced visualization, motion scaling, and tremor filtration. As a result, robotic-assisted surgery has become the standard of care for complex procedures, such as radical prostatectomy, with demonstrated benefits in reducing complications and improving clinical outcomes. Despite the rapid evolution of this field, no comprehensive bibliometric analysis has systematically evaluated its scientific trajectory, research trends, and international collaboration. A cross-sectional bibliometric study was conducted using Scopus as the primary data source. A semi-structured search strategy incorporating MeSH terms and synonyms was applied to identify publications related to robotic surgery in urogenital diseases. Data were exported, standardized, and analyzed using Bibliometrix (R 4.3.1) for bibliometric and network analyses. A total of 3506 publications (1993-2024) were included, with 79.2% original articles and 11.6% reviews. The United States (n = 1388) led the scientific production, followed by Italy (n = 389) and Japan (n = 285). The research predominantly focused on prostate tumors, clinical outcomes, and surgical complications, while recent trends highlighted growing interest in robot-assisted total cystectomy. The exponential growth of robotic surgery research aligns with its increasing clinical adoption. However, regional disparities persist, emphasizing the need to expand scientific contributions from high-volume surgical centers. Promoting global research collaboration will further consolidate robotic surgery as a fundamental tool in urological practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02359-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic surgery has revolutionized modern medicine, particularly in urology, by enhancing surgical precision through advanced visualization, motion scaling, and tremor filtration. As a result, robotic-assisted surgery has become the standard of care for complex procedures, such as radical prostatectomy, with demonstrated benefits in reducing complications and improving clinical outcomes. Despite the rapid evolution of this field, no comprehensive bibliometric analysis has systematically evaluated its scientific trajectory, research trends, and international collaboration. A cross-sectional bibliometric study was conducted using Scopus as the primary data source. A semi-structured search strategy incorporating MeSH terms and synonyms was applied to identify publications related to robotic surgery in urogenital diseases. Data were exported, standardized, and analyzed using Bibliometrix (R 4.3.1) for bibliometric and network analyses. A total of 3506 publications (1993-2024) were included, with 79.2% original articles and 11.6% reviews. The United States (n = 1388) led the scientific production, followed by Italy (n = 389) and Japan (n = 285). The research predominantly focused on prostate tumors, clinical outcomes, and surgical complications, while recent trends highlighted growing interest in robot-assisted total cystectomy. The exponential growth of robotic surgery research aligns with its increasing clinical adoption. However, regional disparities persist, emphasizing the need to expand scientific contributions from high-volume surgical centers. Promoting global research collaboration will further consolidate robotic surgery as a fundamental tool in urological practice.

泌尿生殖系统疾病机器人手术的科学发展:文献计量学分析。
机器人手术已经彻底改变了现代医学,特别是在泌尿外科,通过先进的可视化、运动缩放和震颤过滤来提高手术精度。因此,机器人辅助手术已成为复杂手术的标准治疗方法,如根治性前列腺切除术,在减少并发症和改善临床结果方面具有明显的好处。尽管这一领域发展迅速,但尚未有全面的文献计量学分析系统地评估其科学轨迹、研究趋势和国际合作。以Scopus为主要数据来源,进行横向文献计量学研究。结合MeSH术语和同义词的半结构化搜索策略被应用于识别与泌尿生殖系统疾病机器人手术相关的出版物。数据导出、标准化并使用Bibliometrix (R 4.3.1)进行文献计量和网络分析。共收录3506篇文献(1993-2024),其中原创文章占79.2%,综述文章占11.6%。美国(1388人)的科研成果最多,其次是意大利(389人)和日本(285人)。研究主要集中在前列腺肿瘤、临床结果和手术并发症,而最近的趋势突出了对机器人辅助全膀胱切除术的兴趣。机器人手术研究的指数增长与其越来越多的临床应用相一致。然而,地区差异仍然存在,强调需要扩大来自大容量外科中心的科学贡献。促进全球研究合作将进一步巩固机器人手术作为泌尿外科实践的基本工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信