Experience in clinical application of various protocols in bone insertion channel preparation for dental implants.

Q4 Medicine

Wiadomosci lekarskie Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.36740/WLek/203883

Iurii O Mochalov, Serhii S Tsuperiak, Vladyslav O Humeniuk, Bohdan G Mykhajlychenko, Oksana V Klitynska

{"title":"Experience in clinical application of various protocols in bone insertion channel preparation for dental implants.","authors":"Iurii O Mochalov, Serhii S Tsuperiak, Vladyslav O Humeniuk, Bohdan G Mykhajlychenko, Oksana V Klitynska","doi":"10.36740/WLek/203883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Aim: To analyze and compare the results of clinical usage of two protocols of bone drilling during the surgical stage of dental implantation.Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: The clinical study group was formed from 30 patients. All selected patients underwent dental implantation in the lateral segments of the jaws using a delayed two-stage technique, using the standard drilling protocol (1000 rpm) and slow (50 rpm). The study included measuring implants' torque during the installation, bone density, and marginal bone resorption after 1,5 years.Results: Results: The slow bone tissue preparation protocol showed the higher torque level during the installation, and did not cause significant changes in the structure of the bone tissue and level of sauserisation compared to the standard protocol for preparation.Conclusion: Conclusions: The usage of two different protocols showed a significant difference at the moment of installation. However, it did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the two sgroups of patients during the long-term follow-up.","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"78 4","pages":"777-782"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/203883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: To analyze and compare the results of clinical usage of two protocols of bone drilling during the surgical stage of dental implantation.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: The clinical study group was formed from 30 patients. All selected patients underwent dental implantation in the lateral segments of the jaws using a delayed two-stage technique, using the standard drilling protocol (1000 rpm) and slow (50 rpm). The study included measuring implants' torque during the installation, bone density, and marginal bone resorption after 1,5 years.

Results: Results: The slow bone tissue preparation protocol showed the higher torque level during the installation, and did not cause significant changes in the structure of the bone tissue and level of sauserisation compared to the standard protocol for preparation.

Conclusion: Conclusions: The usage of two different protocols showed a significant difference at the moment of installation. However, it did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the two sgroups of patients during the long-term follow-up.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不同方案在种植体植骨通道制备中的临床应用经验。

目的：分析比较两种钻孔方法在种植牙手术阶段的临床应用效果。患者与方法：材料与方法：临床研究组由30例患者组成。所有选定的患者采用延迟两阶段技术，使用标准钻孔方案（1000 rpm）和慢速（50 rpm）在颌骨外侧段进行牙种植。该研究包括测量植入物安装时的扭矩、骨密度和1.5年后的边缘骨吸收。结果：慢速骨组织准备方案在安装过程中显示出更高的扭矩水平，并且与标准准备方案相比，没有引起骨组织结构和sauserisation水平的显著变化。结论：两种不同方案的使用在安装时存在显著差异。然而，在长期随访中，两组患者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Wiadomosci lekarskie Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

482