[Unilateral biportal endoscopy-assisted decompression strategy for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis].

Q3 Medicine
Xuyang Xu, Zhiqiang Zhang, Zijie Wang, Liang Zhang, Jun Cai, Xinmin Feng, Yu Ding, Yi Zhang
{"title":"[Unilateral biportal endoscopy-assisted decompression strategy for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis].","authors":"Xuyang Xu, Zhiqiang Zhang, Zijie Wang, Liang Zhang, Jun Cai, Xinmin Feng, Yu Ding, Yi Zhang","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202502068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore decompression strategies for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis under unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) assistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical data of 86 patients with lateral lumbar stenosis treated with UBE-assisted intervertebral decompression between September 2022 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 42 males and 44 females with an average age of 63.6 years (range, 45-79 years). The disease duration ranged from 6 to 14 months (mean, 8.5 months). Surgical levels included L <sub>2, 3</sub> in 3 cases, L <sub>3, 4</sub> in 26 cases, L <sub>4, 5</sub> in 42 cases, and L <sub>5</sub>, S <sub>1</sub> in 15 cases. According to Lee's grading system, there were 21 cases of grade 1, 37 cases of grade 2, and 28 cases of grade 3 for lumbar spinal stenosis. Based on the location of stenosis and clinical symptoms, the 33 cases underwent interlaminar approach, 7 cases underwent interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision, 26 cases underwent contralateral inclinatory approach, and 20 cases underwent paraspinal approach; then, the corresponding decompression procedures were performed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate lower back/leg pain before operation and at 1 and 3 months after operation, while Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate spinal function. At 3 months after operation, the effectiveness was evaluated using the modified MacNab evaluation criteria. The spinal stenosis and decompression were evaluated based on Lee's grading system using lumbar MRI before operation and at 3 months after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were successfully completed with mean operation time of 95.1 minutes (range, 57-166 minutes). Dural tears occurred in 2 cases treated with interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 3-10 months (mean, 5.9 months). The clinical symptoms of the patients relieved to varying degrees. The VAS scores and ODI of lower back and leg pain at 1 and 3 months after operation significantly improved compared to preoperative levels ( <i>P</i><0.05), and the indicators at 3 months significantly improved than that at 1 month ( <i>P</i><0.05). According to the modified MacNab evaluation criteria, the effectiveness at 3 months after operation was rated as excellent in 52 cases, good in 21 cases, and poor in 13 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.9%. No lumbar instability was detected on flexion-extension X-ray films during follow-up. The Lee's grading of lateral lumbar stenosis at 2 days after operation showed significant improvement compared to preoperative grading ( <i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For lateral lumbar spinal stenosis, UBE-assisted decompression of the spinal canal requires the selection of interlaminar approach, interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision, contralateral inclinatory approach, and paraspinal approach based on preoperative imaging findings and clinical symptoms to achieve better effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 5","pages":"612-619"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202502068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore decompression strategies for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis under unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) assistance.

Methods: A clinical data of 86 patients with lateral lumbar stenosis treated with UBE-assisted intervertebral decompression between September 2022 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 42 males and 44 females with an average age of 63.6 years (range, 45-79 years). The disease duration ranged from 6 to 14 months (mean, 8.5 months). Surgical levels included L 2, 3 in 3 cases, L 3, 4 in 26 cases, L 4, 5 in 42 cases, and L 5, S 1 in 15 cases. According to Lee's grading system, there were 21 cases of grade 1, 37 cases of grade 2, and 28 cases of grade 3 for lumbar spinal stenosis. Based on the location of stenosis and clinical symptoms, the 33 cases underwent interlaminar approach, 7 cases underwent interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision, 26 cases underwent contralateral inclinatory approach, and 20 cases underwent paraspinal approach; then, the corresponding decompression procedures were performed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate lower back/leg pain before operation and at 1 and 3 months after operation, while Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate spinal function. At 3 months after operation, the effectiveness was evaluated using the modified MacNab evaluation criteria. The spinal stenosis and decompression were evaluated based on Lee's grading system using lumbar MRI before operation and at 3 months after operation.

Results: All procedures were successfully completed with mean operation time of 95.1 minutes (range, 57-166 minutes). Dural tears occurred in 2 cases treated with interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 3-10 months (mean, 5.9 months). The clinical symptoms of the patients relieved to varying degrees. The VAS scores and ODI of lower back and leg pain at 1 and 3 months after operation significantly improved compared to preoperative levels ( P<0.05), and the indicators at 3 months significantly improved than that at 1 month ( P<0.05). According to the modified MacNab evaluation criteria, the effectiveness at 3 months after operation was rated as excellent in 52 cases, good in 21 cases, and poor in 13 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.9%. No lumbar instability was detected on flexion-extension X-ray films during follow-up. The Lee's grading of lateral lumbar stenosis at 2 days after operation showed significant improvement compared to preoperative grading ( P<0.05).

Conclusion: For lateral lumbar spinal stenosis, UBE-assisted decompression of the spinal canal requires the selection of interlaminar approach, interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision, contralateral inclinatory approach, and paraspinal approach based on preoperative imaging findings and clinical symptoms to achieve better effectiveness.

[单侧双门静脉内窥镜辅助下腰椎侧方狭窄减压策略]。
目的:探讨单侧双门静脉内窥镜(UBE)辅助下腰椎侧方狭窄症的减压策略。方法:回顾性分析2022年9月至2023年12月86例腰椎侧位狭窄症患者行ube辅助椎间减压术的临床资料。男性42例,女性44例,平均年龄63.6岁(45 ~ 79岁)。病程6 ~ 14个月(平均8.5个月)。手术水平:l3、3例,l3、4例26例,l3、5例42例,l3、s1例15例。根据Lee的分级系统,腰椎管狭窄1级21例,2级37例,3级28例。根据狭窄部位及临床症状,33例行椎间入路,7例行椎间第三辅助切口入路,26例行对侧斜入路,20例行椎旁入路;然后进行相应的减压手术。采用视觉模拟评分法(Visual analogue scale, VAS)评价患者术前及术后1、3个月的下背部/腿部疼痛,采用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评价脊柱功能。术后3个月,采用改良的MacNab评价标准评价疗效。术前和术后3个月采用腰椎MRI评估椎管狭窄和减压情况。结果:所有手术均顺利完成,平均手术时间95.1 min(范围57 ~ 166 min)。经第三辅助切口椎间入路治疗2例发生硬脑膜撕裂。所有切口一次愈合。随访3 ~ 10个月(平均5.9个月)。患者临床症状均有不同程度缓解。术后1个月和3个月腰腿疼痛的VAS评分和ODI较术前有明显改善(ppp)结论:对于侧位腰椎管狭窄,ube辅助椎管减压术需要根据术前影像学表现和临床症状选择椎间入路、椎间辅助第三切口入路、对侧斜入路和椎旁入路,以获得更好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信