Accuracy of computer-assisted drilling of equine cervical vertebral bodies using a purpose-built cervical frame-An experimental cadaveric study.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Thimo Maurer, Mathieu de Preux, Christina Precht, Beatriz Vidondo, Christoph Koch
{"title":"Accuracy of computer-assisted drilling of equine cervical vertebral bodies using a purpose-built cervical frame-An experimental cadaveric study.","authors":"Thimo Maurer, Mathieu de Preux, Christina Precht, Beatriz Vidondo, Christoph Koch","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) of equine cervical vertebrae using a purpose-built cervical frame (CF) for neck stabilization.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental cadaveric study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>Six whole fresh equine cadavers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cadavers were positioned in dorsal recumbency with the neck extended within the CF. A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based surgical navigation system with optical tracking was used. A ventral approach exposed cervical vertebrae C3-C5. In each cadaver, 12 drill corridors were prepared with the patient tracker on the CF (position CF), followed by 12 corridors with the patient tracker on C3 (position C3). Surgical accuracy aberration (SAA) was assessed by measuring Euclidean distances between planned and executed entry and target points on merged pre- and postoperative datasets. Descriptive statistics and repeated-measures analyses of variance (rep.-meas. ANOVA) compared SAA measurements between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± SD SAA (Euclidean distance) was 2.00 ± 0.98 mm in patient tracker position CF, and 2.41 ± 1.31 mm in position C3 (rep.-meas. ANOVA p = .215). At the most dorsal point of the drill corridor, dorsoventral deviations >2 mm occurred in 5/72 measurements in patient tracker position CF, and in 12/72 measurements in position C3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CF allowed for unrestricted pre- and intraoperative CBCT imaging and computer-assisted drilling with a SAA in the close range of 2 mm. Positioning the patient tracker on the CF, outside the surgical field, did not compromise surgical accuracy.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>A CF can facilitate CAS for surgeries with a ventral approach to the equine cervical vertebral column.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) of equine cervical vertebrae using a purpose-built cervical frame (CF) for neck stabilization.

Study design: Experimental cadaveric study.

Sample population: Six whole fresh equine cadavers.

Methods: Cadavers were positioned in dorsal recumbency with the neck extended within the CF. A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based surgical navigation system with optical tracking was used. A ventral approach exposed cervical vertebrae C3-C5. In each cadaver, 12 drill corridors were prepared with the patient tracker on the CF (position CF), followed by 12 corridors with the patient tracker on C3 (position C3). Surgical accuracy aberration (SAA) was assessed by measuring Euclidean distances between planned and executed entry and target points on merged pre- and postoperative datasets. Descriptive statistics and repeated-measures analyses of variance (rep.-meas. ANOVA) compared SAA measurements between groups.

Results: The mean ± SD SAA (Euclidean distance) was 2.00 ± 0.98 mm in patient tracker position CF, and 2.41 ± 1.31 mm in position C3 (rep.-meas. ANOVA p = .215). At the most dorsal point of the drill corridor, dorsoventral deviations >2 mm occurred in 5/72 measurements in patient tracker position CF, and in 12/72 measurements in position C3.

Conclusion: The CF allowed for unrestricted pre- and intraoperative CBCT imaging and computer-assisted drilling with a SAA in the close range of 2 mm. Positioning the patient tracker on the CF, outside the surgical field, did not compromise surgical accuracy.

Clinical significance: A CF can facilitate CAS for surgeries with a ventral approach to the equine cervical vertebral column.

计算机辅助钻孔马颈椎椎体的准确性使用专用颈椎框架-一项实验性尸体研究。
目的:评价计算机辅助马颈椎手术(CAS)使用专用颈椎架(CF)进行颈部稳定的准确性。研究设计:实验性尸体研究。样本人群:6具完整的新鲜马尸体。方法:尸体背部平躺,颈部在CF内伸展。使用基于锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的光学跟踪手术导航系统。腹侧入路暴露颈椎C3-C5。在每具尸体上,将患者追踪器放置在CF(位置CF)上准备12个钻孔通道,然后将患者追踪器放置在C3(位置C3)上准备12个钻孔通道。通过在合并的术前和术后数据集上测量计划和执行的进入点与目标点之间的欧几里得距离来评估手术准确度差(SAA)。描述性统计和重复测量方差分析(rep. mean)。方差分析(ANOVA)比较各组间SAA测量值。结果:患者追踪器位置CF的平均±SD SAA(欧氏距离)为2.00±0.98 mm, C3位置的平均±SD SAA为2.41±1.31 mm。方差分析p = .215)。在钻孔通道最背侧点,患者追踪器位置CF的5/72测量和C3位置的12/72测量发生背腹侧偏移bbbb2 mm。结论:CF允许无限制的术前和术中CBCT成像和计算机辅助钻取近2 mm的SAA。将患者追踪器放置在CF上,手术视野外,不影响手术的准确性。临床意义:CF可促进经腹侧入路马颈椎行CAS手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信