Radiation detriment and effective dose due to exposure to radon.

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Thomas R Beck
{"title":"Radiation detriment and effective dose due to exposure to radon.","authors":"Thomas R Beck","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/add89d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study compares exposures to the lung caused by inhalation of radon and radon progeny with lung doses from external low-linear-energy-transfer (low-LET) radiation. For this purpose, lung cancer risks, lifetime effects and radiation detriments from chronic exposure to radon in homes and workplaces are calculated. The calculations apply accepted risk models derived from studies on miners and residential radon to the representative populations of International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). In addition, comparable calculations are performed to determine risk quantities for the lung associated with low-LET radiation. In a working age population, a constant exposure to radon progeny of 1 working level month (WLM)/year results in a radiation detriment of 6.4∙10<sup>-4</sup>per year (1.8∙10<sup>-4</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup>at a constant exposure of 1 mJ·h·m<sup>-3</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup>). For a whole population that is constantly exposed to a radon concentration of 100 Bq∙m<sup>-3</sup>, the radiation detriment is 1.1∙10<sup>-4</sup>per year. These values are based on epidemiological comparison using miner and residential studies separately. The relative biological effectiveness for alpha particles from the inhalation of radon and radon progeny is estimated to be around 10, which, despite of uncertainties, is significantly below the value of 20 recommended by ICRP for the radiation weighting factor of alpha particles. Comparison of results from epidemiological studies on radon in mines and in homes does not provide sufficient evidence that the fraction of unattached radon progeny has a significantly increased influence on the radiation risk und thus on the effective dose. An average annual effective dose of 6 mSv is determined for constant occupational exposure of a working age population to radon progeny with a rate of 1 WLM per year (1.7 mSv yr<sup>-1</sup>per mJ∙h∙m<sup>-3</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup>). In the case of residential exposure, the average annual effective dose is 1.1 mSv, assuming that a whole population is constantly exposed to a radon activity concentration of 100 Bq∙m<sup>-3</sup>. The dose coefficients determined in this study are lower than the corresponding values derived from biokinetic and dosimetric models and currently recommended by ICRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/add89d","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study compares exposures to the lung caused by inhalation of radon and radon progeny with lung doses from external low-linear-energy-transfer (low-LET) radiation. For this purpose, lung cancer risks, lifetime effects and radiation detriments from chronic exposure to radon in homes and workplaces are calculated. The calculations apply accepted risk models derived from studies on miners and residential radon to the representative populations of International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). In addition, comparable calculations are performed to determine risk quantities for the lung associated with low-LET radiation. In a working age population, a constant exposure to radon progeny of 1 working level month (WLM)/year results in a radiation detriment of 6.4∙10-4per year (1.8∙10-4yr-1at a constant exposure of 1 mJ·h·m-3yr-1). For a whole population that is constantly exposed to a radon concentration of 100 Bq∙m-3, the radiation detriment is 1.1∙10-4per year. These values are based on epidemiological comparison using miner and residential studies separately. The relative biological effectiveness for alpha particles from the inhalation of radon and radon progeny is estimated to be around 10, which, despite of uncertainties, is significantly below the value of 20 recommended by ICRP for the radiation weighting factor of alpha particles. Comparison of results from epidemiological studies on radon in mines and in homes does not provide sufficient evidence that the fraction of unattached radon progeny has a significantly increased influence on the radiation risk und thus on the effective dose. An average annual effective dose of 6 mSv is determined for constant occupational exposure of a working age population to radon progeny with a rate of 1 WLM per year (1.7 mSv yr-1per mJ∙h∙m-3yr-1). In the case of residential exposure, the average annual effective dose is 1.1 mSv, assuming that a whole population is constantly exposed to a radon activity concentration of 100 Bq∙m-3. The dose coefficients determined in this study are lower than the corresponding values derived from biokinetic and dosimetric models and currently recommended by ICRP.

氡照射的辐射危害和有效剂量。
该研究比较了吸入氡和氡子体引起的肺部暴露与外部低let辐射引起的肺剂量。为此目的,计算了在家庭和工作场所长期接触氡所造成的肺癌风险、终生影响和辐射危害。计算将从矿工和住宅氡研究中得出的公认风险模型应用于ICRP的代表性人群。此外,还进行了可比计算,以确定与低let辐射相关的肺部风险量。 ;在工作年龄人群中,持续暴露于1 WLM/年的氡子代会导致每年6.4∙10-4的辐射危害(在持续暴露于1 mJ·h·m-3/y时为1.8∙10-4 y-1)。对于持续暴露于氡浓度为100 Bq∙m-3的全体人口,每年的辐射危害为1.1∙10-4。这些数值分别基于矿工和居民研究的流行病学比较。据估计,吸入氡和氡子体对α粒子的相对生物有效性(RBE)约为10,尽管存在不确定性,但明显低于ICRP建议的α粒子辐射加权因子20的值。对矿山和家庭氡流行病学研究的结果进行比较,并没有提供足够的证据表明,未附著氡子体的比例对辐射风险的影响显著增加,从而对有效剂量产生影响。#xD;工作年龄人口持续职业暴露于氡子体的平均年有效剂量为6毫西弗,暴露率为每年1毫西弗(每mJ∙h∙m-3/y 1.7毫西弗)。在住宅照射的情况下,假定整个人口持续暴露于氡活度浓度为100 Bq∙m-3的情况下,年平均有效剂量为1.1毫西弗。本研究确定的剂量系数低于ICRP目前推荐的生物动力学和剂量学模型得出的相应值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信