Neneh Rosalía Quadflieg, Patiani Batchati, Alva Träbert, Eike Leidgens, Georg Juckel, Jakov Gather, Amma Yeboah, Mirjam Faissner
{"title":"Discriminatory Practices in the German Mental Healthcare System: An Intersectional Grounded Theory Study.","authors":"Neneh Rosalía Quadflieg, Patiani Batchati, Alva Träbert, Eike Leidgens, Georg Juckel, Jakov Gather, Amma Yeboah, Mirjam Faissner","doi":"10.1177/10497323251325793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Discriminatory practices within mental healthcare are a major barrier to the equitable provision of care to <i>all</i> mental healthcare service users. Understanding mechanisms of discrimination is a prerequisite for developing suitable measures to address them. Intersectionality, a framework rooted in Black feminism, has proven to be a powerful tool for understanding the specific forms and experiences of discrimination within interconnected systems of oppression. This study is the first to use an intersectional lens to examine discriminatory practices within the German mental healthcare system from the perspectives of service users, providers, and psychosocial counselors. In collaboration with local organizations in Bochum, Germany, we conducted 17 semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed according to constructed grounded theory methodology. Our results indicate that discriminatory practices undermine access to and quality of healthcare delivery for marginalized mental healthcare service users. On an interpersonal level, these practices included stereotyping, devaluation, Othering, invalidation, silencing, withholding information, and treatment refusals. On an organizational level, care was undermined by a lack of interpretation services, discriminatory admission practices and documentation procedures, a lack of competencies among mental healthcare providers, as well as suitable treatment options and environments for marginalized service users. Service users described various strategies to navigate mental healthcare, including confrontation and selective narration. Mental healthcare providers showed various reactions toward discriminatory practices, ranging from defensiveness to acknowledgment. We discuss the results in their interrelationship with institutional Whiteness, cis-heteronormativity, and mental illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251325793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251325793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Discriminatory practices within mental healthcare are a major barrier to the equitable provision of care to all mental healthcare service users. Understanding mechanisms of discrimination is a prerequisite for developing suitable measures to address them. Intersectionality, a framework rooted in Black feminism, has proven to be a powerful tool for understanding the specific forms and experiences of discrimination within interconnected systems of oppression. This study is the first to use an intersectional lens to examine discriminatory practices within the German mental healthcare system from the perspectives of service users, providers, and psychosocial counselors. In collaboration with local organizations in Bochum, Germany, we conducted 17 semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed according to constructed grounded theory methodology. Our results indicate that discriminatory practices undermine access to and quality of healthcare delivery for marginalized mental healthcare service users. On an interpersonal level, these practices included stereotyping, devaluation, Othering, invalidation, silencing, withholding information, and treatment refusals. On an organizational level, care was undermined by a lack of interpretation services, discriminatory admission practices and documentation procedures, a lack of competencies among mental healthcare providers, as well as suitable treatment options and environments for marginalized service users. Service users described various strategies to navigate mental healthcare, including confrontation and selective narration. Mental healthcare providers showed various reactions toward discriminatory practices, ranging from defensiveness to acknowledgment. We discuss the results in their interrelationship with institutional Whiteness, cis-heteronormativity, and mental illness.
期刊介绍:
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.