[Effectiveness of arthroscopic release assisted with medial small incision in treatment of non-traumatic elbow stiffness].

Q3 Medicine
Lijun Lü, Yanyan Chang, Baojun Zhou, Qiuming Gao, Jieliang Hu, Liyuan Chen, Kongxing Wei, Fujun Gao, Wentao Li, Xin Yuan, Yibin Jin
{"title":"[Effectiveness of arthroscopic release assisted with medial small incision in treatment of non-traumatic elbow stiffness].","authors":"Lijun Lü, Yanyan Chang, Baojun Zhou, Qiuming Gao, Jieliang Hu, Liyuan Chen, Kongxing Wei, Fujun Gao, Wentao Li, Xin Yuan, Yibin Jin","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202502076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effectiveness of arthroscopic release of elbow joint assisted by medial small incision ulnar nerve release in the treatment of non-traumatic elbow stiffness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 15 patients with non-traumatic elbow stiffness treated with arthroscopic release of elbow joint assisted by medial small incision ulnar nerve release between April 2019 and September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 6 males and 9 females with an average age of 46 years ranging from 34 to 56 years. The causes included rheumatoid arthritis in 3 cases, gouty arthritis in 2 cases, loose bodies in 3 cases, and elbow osteoarthritis in 7 cases. There were 4 cases with ulnar neuritis and 3 cases with synovial osteochondromatosis. The duration of elbow stiffness ranged from 6 to 18 months, with an average of 10 months. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The effectiveness was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, range of elbow motion (maximum flexion, maximum extension, and total flexion and extension), Mayo score, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) elbow score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operation time was 60-90 minutes, with an average of 65 minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was 40-100 mL, with an average of 62 mL. All patients were followed up 13-18 months, with an average of 14 months. There was no complication such as vascular and nerve injury, poor wound healing, collateral ligament injury, elbow joint space narrowing, osteophyte proliferation, or loose body formation around the joint. At last follow-up, the elbow range of motion (maximum flexion, maximum extension, and total flexion and extension), VAS score, and Mayo score significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( <i>P</i><0.05). The HSS elbow score was 85-95, with an average of 92; 12 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and the excellent and good rate was 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arthroscopic release of elbow joint assisted by medial small incision ulnar nerve release is an effective way to treat non-traumatic elbow stiffness, which has the advantages of small trauma, short operation time, and good effectiveness. It can carry out early elbow rehabilitation training and significantly improve elbow function.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 5","pages":"563-568"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202502076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effectiveness of arthroscopic release of elbow joint assisted by medial small incision ulnar nerve release in the treatment of non-traumatic elbow stiffness.

Methods: The clinical data of 15 patients with non-traumatic elbow stiffness treated with arthroscopic release of elbow joint assisted by medial small incision ulnar nerve release between April 2019 and September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 6 males and 9 females with an average age of 46 years ranging from 34 to 56 years. The causes included rheumatoid arthritis in 3 cases, gouty arthritis in 2 cases, loose bodies in 3 cases, and elbow osteoarthritis in 7 cases. There were 4 cases with ulnar neuritis and 3 cases with synovial osteochondromatosis. The duration of elbow stiffness ranged from 6 to 18 months, with an average of 10 months. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The effectiveness was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, range of elbow motion (maximum flexion, maximum extension, and total flexion and extension), Mayo score, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) elbow score.

Results: The operation time was 60-90 minutes, with an average of 65 minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was 40-100 mL, with an average of 62 mL. All patients were followed up 13-18 months, with an average of 14 months. There was no complication such as vascular and nerve injury, poor wound healing, collateral ligament injury, elbow joint space narrowing, osteophyte proliferation, or loose body formation around the joint. At last follow-up, the elbow range of motion (maximum flexion, maximum extension, and total flexion and extension), VAS score, and Mayo score significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05). The HSS elbow score was 85-95, with an average of 92; 12 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and the excellent and good rate was 100%.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic release of elbow joint assisted by medial small incision ulnar nerve release is an effective way to treat non-traumatic elbow stiffness, which has the advantages of small trauma, short operation time, and good effectiveness. It can carry out early elbow rehabilitation training and significantly improve elbow function.

[关节镜下松解配合内侧小切口治疗非外伤性肘关节僵硬的疗效]。
目的:探讨关节镜下肘关节松解配合内侧小切口尺神经松解治疗非外伤性肘关节僵硬的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2019年4月至2023年9月15例非外伤性肘关节僵硬患者的临床资料,采用关节镜下肘关节松解辅助内侧小切口尺神经松解。男6例,女9例,平均年龄46岁,年龄34 ~ 56岁。病因类风湿关节炎3例,痛风性关节炎2例,松体性关节炎3例,肘关节骨关节炎7例。尺神经炎4例,滑膜骨软骨瘤病3例。肘关节僵硬的持续时间为6 ~ 18个月,平均为10个月。记录手术时间及术中出血量。通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、肘关节活动范围(最大屈曲、最大伸展和总屈曲和伸展)、Mayo评分和特殊外科医院(HSS)肘关节评分来评估疗效。结果:手术时间60 ~ 90分钟,平均65分钟,术中出血量40 ~ 100 mL,平均62 mL。所有患者随访13 ~ 18个月,平均14个月。无血管、神经损伤、创面愈合不良、副韧带损伤、肘关节间隙狭窄、骨赘增生、关节周围松体形成等并发症。最后随访时肘关节活动度(最大屈曲度、最大伸曲度、全屈伸度)、VAS评分、Mayo评分较术前有明显改善(p结论:关节镜下肘关节松解配合内侧小切口尺神经松解是治疗非外伤性肘关节僵硬的有效方法,创伤小、手术时间短、效果好。可进行早期肘部康复训练,明显改善肘部功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信