Enhanced protein extraction and quantification protocol for microsamples: An ultra-sensitive workflow for low-volume, low-concentration total protein lysates.

IF 5.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Protein Science Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1002/pro.70161
Taylor Wilcox, Michael E Widlansky, Justin Westhoff, Jingli Wang, Rong Ying, Abigail Thorgerson, Michelle L Roberts
{"title":"Enhanced protein extraction and quantification protocol for microsamples: An ultra-sensitive workflow for low-volume, low-concentration total protein lysates.","authors":"Taylor Wilcox, Michael E Widlansky, Justin Westhoff, Jingli Wang, Rong Ying, Abigail Thorgerson, Michelle L Roberts","doi":"10.1002/pro.70161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate protein quantification at low concentrations and small volumes is critical for advancing small-scale research, such as microvasculature studies. However, existing microscale protocols often require ≥5 μL of sample or highly concentrated lysates, limiting their applicability in contexts with scarce material. To overcome these limitations, we developed the Nano-Extraction BCA-Optimized Workflow (NEBOW), a novel method requiring only 2 μL of sample and capable of detecting protein concentrations as low as 0.01 mg/mL. Optimized for the NanoDrop™ One UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, this workflow demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and reproducibility compared to the standard BCA assay. Paired t tests (p < 0.01) and TOST equivalence testing (15% margin) confirmed key differences, with the NEBOW method producing steeper standard curves and more consistent results at low concentrations. Bland-Altman analysis showed that standard BCA tends to overestimate protein levels, while the NEBOW method maintained accuracy across a range of low-input samples. Western blot validation supported the improved performance of the new workflow. This approach offers a reliable, cost-effective solution for protein quantification when sample availability is limited, without sacrificing accuracy or sample integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20761,"journal":{"name":"Protein Science","volume":"34 6","pages":"e70161"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protein Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate protein quantification at low concentrations and small volumes is critical for advancing small-scale research, such as microvasculature studies. However, existing microscale protocols often require ≥5 μL of sample or highly concentrated lysates, limiting their applicability in contexts with scarce material. To overcome these limitations, we developed the Nano-Extraction BCA-Optimized Workflow (NEBOW), a novel method requiring only 2 μL of sample and capable of detecting protein concentrations as low as 0.01 mg/mL. Optimized for the NanoDrop™ One UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, this workflow demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and reproducibility compared to the standard BCA assay. Paired t tests (p < 0.01) and TOST equivalence testing (15% margin) confirmed key differences, with the NEBOW method producing steeper standard curves and more consistent results at low concentrations. Bland-Altman analysis showed that standard BCA tends to overestimate protein levels, while the NEBOW method maintained accuracy across a range of low-input samples. Western blot validation supported the improved performance of the new workflow. This approach offers a reliable, cost-effective solution for protein quantification when sample availability is limited, without sacrificing accuracy or sample integrity.

增强蛋白质提取和定量方案的微样品:一个超敏感的工作流程,低体积,低浓度的总蛋白裂解物。
低浓度和小体积的精确蛋白质定量对于推进小规模研究(如微血管研究)至关重要。然而,现有的微尺度方案通常需要≥5 μL的样品或高浓度的裂解物,限制了它们在材料稀缺的情况下的适用性。为了克服这些限制,我们开发了纳米提取bca优化工作流程(NEBOW),这种新方法只需要2 μL的样品,就能检测到低至0.01 mg/mL的蛋白质浓度。针对NanoDrop™One UV-Vis分光光度计进行了优化,与标准BCA测定相比,该工作流程显着提高了灵敏度和重现性。配对t检验(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Protein Science
Protein Science 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.20%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Protein Science, the flagship journal of The Protein Society, is a publication that focuses on advancing fundamental knowledge in the field of protein molecules. The journal welcomes original reports and review articles that contribute to our understanding of protein function, structure, folding, design, and evolution. Additionally, Protein Science encourages papers that explore the applications of protein science in various areas such as therapeutics, protein-based biomaterials, bionanotechnology, synthetic biology, and bioelectronics. The journal accepts manuscript submissions in any suitable format for review, with the requirement of converting the manuscript to journal-style format only upon acceptance for publication. Protein Science is indexed and abstracted in numerous databases, including the Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest), CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS), Embase (Elsevier), Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Materials Science & Engineering Database (ProQuest), MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM), Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), and SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信