Enhanced protein extraction and quantification protocol for microsamples: An ultra-sensitive workflow for low-volume, low-concentration total protein lysates.
Taylor Wilcox, Michael E Widlansky, Justin Westhoff, Jingli Wang, Rong Ying, Abigail Thorgerson, Michelle L Roberts
{"title":"Enhanced protein extraction and quantification protocol for microsamples: An ultra-sensitive workflow for low-volume, low-concentration total protein lysates.","authors":"Taylor Wilcox, Michael E Widlansky, Justin Westhoff, Jingli Wang, Rong Ying, Abigail Thorgerson, Michelle L Roberts","doi":"10.1002/pro.70161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate protein quantification at low concentrations and small volumes is critical for advancing small-scale research, such as microvasculature studies. However, existing microscale protocols often require ≥5 μL of sample or highly concentrated lysates, limiting their applicability in contexts with scarce material. To overcome these limitations, we developed the Nano-Extraction BCA-Optimized Workflow (NEBOW), a novel method requiring only 2 μL of sample and capable of detecting protein concentrations as low as 0.01 mg/mL. Optimized for the NanoDrop™ One UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, this workflow demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and reproducibility compared to the standard BCA assay. Paired t tests (p < 0.01) and TOST equivalence testing (15% margin) confirmed key differences, with the NEBOW method producing steeper standard curves and more consistent results at low concentrations. Bland-Altman analysis showed that standard BCA tends to overestimate protein levels, while the NEBOW method maintained accuracy across a range of low-input samples. Western blot validation supported the improved performance of the new workflow. This approach offers a reliable, cost-effective solution for protein quantification when sample availability is limited, without sacrificing accuracy or sample integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20761,"journal":{"name":"Protein Science","volume":"34 6","pages":"e70161"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protein Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate protein quantification at low concentrations and small volumes is critical for advancing small-scale research, such as microvasculature studies. However, existing microscale protocols often require ≥5 μL of sample or highly concentrated lysates, limiting their applicability in contexts with scarce material. To overcome these limitations, we developed the Nano-Extraction BCA-Optimized Workflow (NEBOW), a novel method requiring only 2 μL of sample and capable of detecting protein concentrations as low as 0.01 mg/mL. Optimized for the NanoDrop™ One UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, this workflow demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and reproducibility compared to the standard BCA assay. Paired t tests (p < 0.01) and TOST equivalence testing (15% margin) confirmed key differences, with the NEBOW method producing steeper standard curves and more consistent results at low concentrations. Bland-Altman analysis showed that standard BCA tends to overestimate protein levels, while the NEBOW method maintained accuracy across a range of low-input samples. Western blot validation supported the improved performance of the new workflow. This approach offers a reliable, cost-effective solution for protein quantification when sample availability is limited, without sacrificing accuracy or sample integrity.
期刊介绍:
Protein Science, the flagship journal of The Protein Society, is a publication that focuses on advancing fundamental knowledge in the field of protein molecules. The journal welcomes original reports and review articles that contribute to our understanding of protein function, structure, folding, design, and evolution.
Additionally, Protein Science encourages papers that explore the applications of protein science in various areas such as therapeutics, protein-based biomaterials, bionanotechnology, synthetic biology, and bioelectronics.
The journal accepts manuscript submissions in any suitable format for review, with the requirement of converting the manuscript to journal-style format only upon acceptance for publication.
Protein Science is indexed and abstracted in numerous databases, including the Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest), CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS), Embase (Elsevier), Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Materials Science & Engineering Database (ProQuest), MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM), Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), and SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest).