G Ongaro, J G Hamilton, V Groner, J L Hay, M Calvello, S Oliveri, B Bonanni, I Feroce, G Pravettoni
{"title":"A Multi-Level Analysis of Barriers and Promoting Factors to Cascade Screening Uptake Among Male Relatives of BRCA1/2 Carriers: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"G Ongaro, J G Hamilton, V Groner, J L Hay, M Calvello, S Oliveri, B Bonanni, I Feroce, G Pravettoni","doi":"10.1002/pon.70160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes significantly elevate risks of breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Clinical guidelines recommend cascade screening (CS) to identify at-risk family members and advance genetically targeted disease prevention. However, despite the benefits of CS, testing uptake remains suboptimal, particularly among male first-degree relatives (FDRs) of female BRCA1/2 carriers.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Little is known about factors that hinder or enhance the implementation of CS in at-risk men in BRCA-positive families. This qualitative study explored multifaceted barriers and promoting factors influencing CS in 11 untested male FDRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants engaged in semi-structured interviews exploring their experiences and perspectives regarding CS uptake. Thematic analysis, guided by the Health Action Process Approach, revealed a complex interplay of barriers and promoting factors at individual, interpersonal, provider, and environmental levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key barriers included limited awareness and communication, inaccurate knowledge regarding genetic testing, logistical constraints, and concerns regarding potential psychological outcomes. Potential promoting factors encompassed factors such as men's stage of life, actionability of genetic testing results, perceived benefit of prevention, familial cohesion, and provider direct recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the factors shaping CS uptake within BRCA-positive families and hold implications for targeted interventions to enhance CS uptake and improve the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Gender-specific education and public awareness campaigns are crucial, highlighting male cancer risk and surveillance strategies. Exploring alternative delivery methods, such as direct provider engagement with at-risk males, can address challenges of low CS uptake, moving beyond traditional patient-mediated approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 5","pages":"e70160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes significantly elevate risks of breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Clinical guidelines recommend cascade screening (CS) to identify at-risk family members and advance genetically targeted disease prevention. However, despite the benefits of CS, testing uptake remains suboptimal, particularly among male first-degree relatives (FDRs) of female BRCA1/2 carriers.
Aims: Little is known about factors that hinder or enhance the implementation of CS in at-risk men in BRCA-positive families. This qualitative study explored multifaceted barriers and promoting factors influencing CS in 11 untested male FDRs.
Methods: Participants engaged in semi-structured interviews exploring their experiences and perspectives regarding CS uptake. Thematic analysis, guided by the Health Action Process Approach, revealed a complex interplay of barriers and promoting factors at individual, interpersonal, provider, and environmental levels.
Results: Key barriers included limited awareness and communication, inaccurate knowledge regarding genetic testing, logistical constraints, and concerns regarding potential psychological outcomes. Potential promoting factors encompassed factors such as men's stage of life, actionability of genetic testing results, perceived benefit of prevention, familial cohesion, and provider direct recommendations.
Conclusions: These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the factors shaping CS uptake within BRCA-positive families and hold implications for targeted interventions to enhance CS uptake and improve the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Gender-specific education and public awareness campaigns are crucial, highlighting male cancer risk and surveillance strategies. Exploring alternative delivery methods, such as direct provider engagement with at-risk males, can address challenges of low CS uptake, moving beyond traditional patient-mediated approaches.
期刊介绍:
Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology.
This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues.
Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.