A Multi-Level Analysis of Barriers and Promoting Factors to Cascade Screening Uptake Among Male Relatives of BRCA1/2 Carriers: A Qualitative Study.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
G Ongaro, J G Hamilton, V Groner, J L Hay, M Calvello, S Oliveri, B Bonanni, I Feroce, G Pravettoni
{"title":"A Multi-Level Analysis of Barriers and Promoting Factors to Cascade Screening Uptake Among Male Relatives of BRCA1/2 Carriers: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"G Ongaro, J G Hamilton, V Groner, J L Hay, M Calvello, S Oliveri, B Bonanni, I Feroce, G Pravettoni","doi":"10.1002/pon.70160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes significantly elevate risks of breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Clinical guidelines recommend cascade screening (CS) to identify at-risk family members and advance genetically targeted disease prevention. However, despite the benefits of CS, testing uptake remains suboptimal, particularly among male first-degree relatives (FDRs) of female BRCA1/2 carriers.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Little is known about factors that hinder or enhance the implementation of CS in at-risk men in BRCA-positive families. This qualitative study explored multifaceted barriers and promoting factors influencing CS in 11 untested male FDRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants engaged in semi-structured interviews exploring their experiences and perspectives regarding CS uptake. Thematic analysis, guided by the Health Action Process Approach, revealed a complex interplay of barriers and promoting factors at individual, interpersonal, provider, and environmental levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key barriers included limited awareness and communication, inaccurate knowledge regarding genetic testing, logistical constraints, and concerns regarding potential psychological outcomes. Potential promoting factors encompassed factors such as men's stage of life, actionability of genetic testing results, perceived benefit of prevention, familial cohesion, and provider direct recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the factors shaping CS uptake within BRCA-positive families and hold implications for targeted interventions to enhance CS uptake and improve the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Gender-specific education and public awareness campaigns are crucial, highlighting male cancer risk and surveillance strategies. Exploring alternative delivery methods, such as direct provider engagement with at-risk males, can address challenges of low CS uptake, moving beyond traditional patient-mediated approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 5","pages":"e70160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes significantly elevate risks of breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Clinical guidelines recommend cascade screening (CS) to identify at-risk family members and advance genetically targeted disease prevention. However, despite the benefits of CS, testing uptake remains suboptimal, particularly among male first-degree relatives (FDRs) of female BRCA1/2 carriers.

Aims: Little is known about factors that hinder or enhance the implementation of CS in at-risk men in BRCA-positive families. This qualitative study explored multifaceted barriers and promoting factors influencing CS in 11 untested male FDRs.

Methods: Participants engaged in semi-structured interviews exploring their experiences and perspectives regarding CS uptake. Thematic analysis, guided by the Health Action Process Approach, revealed a complex interplay of barriers and promoting factors at individual, interpersonal, provider, and environmental levels.

Results: Key barriers included limited awareness and communication, inaccurate knowledge regarding genetic testing, logistical constraints, and concerns regarding potential psychological outcomes. Potential promoting factors encompassed factors such as men's stage of life, actionability of genetic testing results, perceived benefit of prevention, familial cohesion, and provider direct recommendations.

Conclusions: These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the factors shaping CS uptake within BRCA-positive families and hold implications for targeted interventions to enhance CS uptake and improve the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Gender-specific education and public awareness campaigns are crucial, highlighting male cancer risk and surveillance strategies. Exploring alternative delivery methods, such as direct provider engagement with at-risk males, can address challenges of low CS uptake, moving beyond traditional patient-mediated approaches.

男性亲属BRCA1/2携带者级联筛查的障碍和促进因素的多层次分析:一项定性研究
背景:BRCA1/2基因的致病变异显著增加乳腺癌、卵巢癌、前列腺癌和胰腺癌的风险。临床指南推荐级联筛选(CS),以确定有风险的家庭成员和推进基因靶向疾病预防。然而,尽管CS有好处,但检测摄取仍然不理想,特别是在女性BRCA1/2携带者的男性一级亲属(fdr)中。目的:在brca阳性家庭的高危男性中,阻碍或促进CS实施的因素知之甚少。本质性研究探讨了11位未被测试的男性fdr的多面障碍和促进因素。方法:参与者参与半结构化访谈,探讨他们对CS吸收的经验和观点。在卫生行动进程方法的指导下,专题分析揭示了个人、人际、提供者和环境各级障碍和促进因素之间复杂的相互作用。结果:主要障碍包括有限的意识和沟通,关于基因检测的不准确知识,后勤限制以及对潜在心理结果的担忧。潜在的促进因素包括男性的生活阶段、基因检测结果的可操作性、预防的感知益处、家庭凝聚力和提供者的直接建议等因素。结论:这些发现有助于更深入地了解brca阳性家族中影响CS摄取的因素,并对有针对性的干预措施提高CS摄取和改善遗传性癌症综合征的管理具有重要意义。针对性别的教育和公众意识运动至关重要,强调男性癌症风险和监测战略。探索其他提供方法,如直接与高危男性接触,可以解决低CS吸收的挑战,超越传统的患者介导的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信