Effects of access to a well-resourced environment on dairy calf cognition and affective state.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323089
Malina Suchon, Daniel M Weary, Marina A G von Keyserlingk
{"title":"Effects of access to a well-resourced environment on dairy calf cognition and affective state.","authors":"Malina Suchon, Daniel M Weary, Marina A G von Keyserlingk","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0323089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dairy calves are often raised without maternal contact and in environments of low complexity. Environments that limit natural behaviors are known to impair cognitive development and affective states. We explored the effect of environmental complexity on one measure of social cognition (the ability to discriminate between conspecifics) and one measure of affective states (sensitivity to reward). Pairs of calves were randomly allocated to either 1) pair housing for 22.5 h/d with 1.5 h of daily access to a well-resourced pen which included 3 other calves and physical devices (Enriched; n = 6 pairs) or, 2) pair housing for 24 h/d (Control; n = 6 pairs). Calves were trained to discriminate between 2 calves in a Y-maze. Twelve of the 24 calves tested met the learning criterion, requiring 15.7 ± 2.59 (mean ± SD) training sessions. Treatment did not affect the number of sessions needed to reach the learning criterion. Calves were then subjected to a Successive Negative Contrast test during which they were trained to approach a 0.5 L milk reward over 3 trials/day for 3 days. On the last training day, latencies of enriched calves increased over daily trials while latencies for control calves were lower and remained relatively consistent, indicative of greater sensitivity to reward. Starting on day 4, the reward was reduced to 0.1L of milk/trial and remained at this level for the next 5 test days. Latency to reach the reward increased across trials within each test day, but no effect of treatment or test day was found. Our findings suggest that calves can discriminate among individuals but learning was not affected by treatments. Calves raised in standard pair housing showed increased sensitivity to reward, consistent with experiencing a more negative emotional state in comparison to calves reared with access to a well-resourced environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 5","pages":"e0323089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dairy calves are often raised without maternal contact and in environments of low complexity. Environments that limit natural behaviors are known to impair cognitive development and affective states. We explored the effect of environmental complexity on one measure of social cognition (the ability to discriminate between conspecifics) and one measure of affective states (sensitivity to reward). Pairs of calves were randomly allocated to either 1) pair housing for 22.5 h/d with 1.5 h of daily access to a well-resourced pen which included 3 other calves and physical devices (Enriched; n = 6 pairs) or, 2) pair housing for 24 h/d (Control; n = 6 pairs). Calves were trained to discriminate between 2 calves in a Y-maze. Twelve of the 24 calves tested met the learning criterion, requiring 15.7 ± 2.59 (mean ± SD) training sessions. Treatment did not affect the number of sessions needed to reach the learning criterion. Calves were then subjected to a Successive Negative Contrast test during which they were trained to approach a 0.5 L milk reward over 3 trials/day for 3 days. On the last training day, latencies of enriched calves increased over daily trials while latencies for control calves were lower and remained relatively consistent, indicative of greater sensitivity to reward. Starting on day 4, the reward was reduced to 0.1L of milk/trial and remained at this level for the next 5 test days. Latency to reach the reward increased across trials within each test day, but no effect of treatment or test day was found. Our findings suggest that calves can discriminate among individuals but learning was not affected by treatments. Calves raised in standard pair housing showed increased sensitivity to reward, consistent with experiencing a more negative emotional state in comparison to calves reared with access to a well-resourced environment.

良好环境对奶牛认知和情感状态的影响。
乳牛通常在没有母亲接触和低复杂性的环境中饲养。众所周知,限制自然行为的环境会损害认知发展和情感状态。我们探讨了环境复杂性对社会认知(区分同种个体的能力)和情感状态(对奖励的敏感性)的影响。一对对小牛被随机分配到1)每组22.5 h/d,每天1.5 h进入一个资源充足的围栏,其中包括3头其他小牛和物理设备(丰富;n = 6对)或,2)24 h/d的一对外壳(对照;N = 6对)。小牛被训练在y形迷宫中区分两只小牛。24头小牛中有12头达到了学习标准,需要15.7±2.59 (mean±SD)次训练。治疗不影响达到学习标准所需的治疗次数。然后,小牛进行连续负对比试验,在此期间,他们被训练为接近0.5升牛奶奖励,每天3次,持续3天。在训练的最后一天,强化小牛的潜伏期比每天的试验都要高,而对照组小牛的潜伏期较低,并且保持相对一致,表明它们对奖励更敏感。从第4天开始,奖励量减少到0.1L /试验,并在接下来的5天保持这一水平。在每个测试日的试验中,达到奖励的潜伏期增加,但没有发现治疗或测试日的影响。我们的研究结果表明,小牛可以区分个体,但学习不受治疗的影响。与在资源充足的环境中饲养的小牛相比,在标准成对的环境中饲养的小牛对奖励的敏感度更高,这与经历更消极的情绪状态是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信