TI-RADS and Bethesda Classification System Correlate With Predicting Pediatric Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Shaunak N Amin, Megan Branson, J Nathaniel Perkins, Xing Wang, Eric C Huang, Tyler G Ketterl, Hedieh Khalatbari, Sanjay R Parikh, Scott C Manning, John P Dahl
{"title":"TI-RADS and Bethesda Classification System Correlate With Predicting Pediatric Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.","authors":"Shaunak N Amin, Megan Branson, J Nathaniel Perkins, Xing Wang, Eric C Huang, Tyler G Ketterl, Hedieh Khalatbari, Sanjay R Parikh, Scott C Manning, John P Dahl","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study objectives were to evaluate the relationship between Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and Bethesda classification and to compare both TI-RADS and Bethesda classification for the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) within the pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic pediatric hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 13-year retrospective review was performed of all pediatric patients undergoing thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) and ultrasound at our institution. Demographics, TI-RADS scoring, FNA results, surgical history, and final pathology were collected. High-risk ultrasonography and cytopathology were defined as TI-RADS 3-5 and Bethesda 5-6, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation was determined for TI-RADS and Bethesda classification. Relative risks of high-risk TI-RADS and Bethesda classification for predicting PTC were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 157 patients (21.7% male, median age at time of FNA 15 years, and range 2.7-21 years) underwent ultrasound and FNA during the study. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for TI-RADS compared with the Bethesda classification was 0.41 (P < .001). The relative risk of high-risk TI-RADS scores to predict the presence of PTC was 7.99 (95% CI 1.16-54.90). High-risk Bethesda classification demonstrated a relative risk for predicting PTC of 6.62 (95% CI 4.22-10.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our cohort, there was a moderate correlation between TI-RADS and Bethesda classifications. Patients with a TI-RADS score ≥3 and Bethesda classification 3 or 4 are at intermediate risk for harboring PTC and should be counseled accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our study objectives were to evaluate the relationship between Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and Bethesda classification and to compare both TI-RADS and Bethesda classification for the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) within the pediatric population.

Study design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Academic pediatric hospital.

Methods: A 13-year retrospective review was performed of all pediatric patients undergoing thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) and ultrasound at our institution. Demographics, TI-RADS scoring, FNA results, surgical history, and final pathology were collected. High-risk ultrasonography and cytopathology were defined as TI-RADS 3-5 and Bethesda 5-6, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation was determined for TI-RADS and Bethesda classification. Relative risks of high-risk TI-RADS and Bethesda classification for predicting PTC were calculated.

Results: A total of 157 patients (21.7% male, median age at time of FNA 15 years, and range 2.7-21 years) underwent ultrasound and FNA during the study. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for TI-RADS compared with the Bethesda classification was 0.41 (P < .001). The relative risk of high-risk TI-RADS scores to predict the presence of PTC was 7.99 (95% CI 1.16-54.90). High-risk Bethesda classification demonstrated a relative risk for predicting PTC of 6.62 (95% CI 4.22-10.41).

Conclusion: In our cohort, there was a moderate correlation between TI-RADS and Bethesda classifications. Patients with a TI-RADS score ≥3 and Bethesda classification 3 or 4 are at intermediate risk for harboring PTC and should be counseled accordingly.

TI-RADS和Bethesda分类系统与预测儿童甲状腺乳头状癌的相关性
目的:我们的研究目的是评估甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)与Bethesda分类的关系,并比较TI-RADS和Bethesda分类在儿科人群中诊断甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的价值。研究设计:回顾性病例系列。单位:学术儿科医院。方法:对我院所有接受甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)和超声检查的患儿进行13年的回顾性分析。统计数据、TI-RADS评分、FNA结果、手术史和最终病理。高危超声和细胞病理学分别定义为TI-RADS 3-5和Bethesda 5-6。测定TI-RADS与Bethesda分类的Spearman等级相关性。计算高危TI-RADS的相对风险和预测PTC的Bethesda分级。结果:157例患者(21.7%男性,FNA时中位年龄15岁,范围2.7-21岁)在研究期间接受了超声和FNA。与Bethesda分类相比,TI-RADS的Spearman等级相关系数为0.41 (P)。结论:在我们的队列中,TI-RADS与Bethesda分类存在中等相关性。TI-RADS评分≥3分、Bethesda分类为3或4分的患者存在中度PTC风险,应给予相应的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信