Efficacy of intratracheal budesonide plus surfactant vs. Surfactant alone on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm Infants: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Aluisio D'lucas Alves Gomes, Elísio Bulhões, Danielle Costa do Amaral, Luis Felipe Matos de Sousa, Ely Cavalcante Lima Júnior, José Airton Alves Ferreira, Hilderlania Alves de Oliveira, Maria Lr Defante, Jafar Aljazeeri
{"title":"Efficacy of intratracheal budesonide plus surfactant vs. Surfactant alone on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm Infants: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Aluisio D'lucas Alves Gomes, Elísio Bulhões, Danielle Costa do Amaral, Luis Felipe Matos de Sousa, Ely Cavalcante Lima Júnior, José Airton Alves Ferreira, Hilderlania Alves de Oliveira, Maria Lr Defante, Jafar Aljazeeri","doi":"10.1016/j.prrv.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a chronic pulmonary disease commonly affecting preterm infants. The potential benefits of combining budesonide with surfactant for preterms with early BPD remain uncertain and warrant further exploration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of intratracheal budesonide plus surfactant compared with surfactant alone in preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central databases from inception to November 2024. We conducted a meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines. We calculated the risk ratios (RRs) of endpoints of interest with 95% confidence intervals using a random effects model. R software (version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed with I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs including 2029 preterm infants were included. Compared with surfactant alone, a combined intratracheal budesonide plus surfactant significantly reduced the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR: 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.54-0.91; p = 0.007; I<sup>2</sup> = 71.4 %), mortality (RR: 0.81; 95 % CI: 0.66-0.98; p = 0.029; I<sup>2</sup> = 14.6 %), pulmonary hemorrhage (RR: 0.58; 95 % CI: 0.37-0.90; p = 0.015; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %) and patent ductus arteriosus (RR: 0.84; 95 % CI: 0.75-0.94; p = 0.004; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis found that intratracheal budesonide plus surfactant reduces the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, mortality, pulmonary hemorrhage and patent ductus arteriosus compared with surfactant alone. Given its potential to reduce pulmonary complications associated with prematurity, clinicians may consider this combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19658,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2025.02.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a chronic pulmonary disease commonly affecting preterm infants. The potential benefits of combining budesonide with surfactant for preterms with early BPD remain uncertain and warrant further exploration.

Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of intratracheal budesonide plus surfactant compared with surfactant alone in preterm infants.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central databases from inception to November 2024. We conducted a meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines. We calculated the risk ratios (RRs) of endpoints of interest with 95% confidence intervals using a random effects model. R software (version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

Results: Eight RCTs including 2029 preterm infants were included. Compared with surfactant alone, a combined intratracheal budesonide plus surfactant significantly reduced the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR: 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.54-0.91; p = 0.007; I2 = 71.4 %), mortality (RR: 0.81; 95 % CI: 0.66-0.98; p = 0.029; I2 = 14.6 %), pulmonary hemorrhage (RR: 0.58; 95 % CI: 0.37-0.90; p = 0.015; I2 = 0 %) and patent ductus arteriosus (RR: 0.84; 95 % CI: 0.75-0.94; p = 0.004; I2 = 0 %).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that intratracheal budesonide plus surfactant reduces the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, mortality, pulmonary hemorrhage and patent ductus arteriosus compared with surfactant alone. Given its potential to reduce pulmonary complications associated with prematurity, clinicians may consider this combination therapy.

气管内布地奈德加表面活性剂与单独表面活性剂治疗早产儿支气管肺发育不良的疗效:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
背景:支气管肺发育不良(BPD)是一种常见于早产儿的慢性肺部疾病。布地奈德联合表面活性剂治疗早期BPD的潜在益处尚不确定,值得进一步探索。目的:我们对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评价气管内布地奈德联合表面活性剂与单独表面活性剂治疗早产儿的疗效。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Central数据库,检索时间为成立至2024年11月。我们按照PRISMA指南进行了荟萃分析。我们使用随机效应模型以95%的置信区间计算感兴趣终点的风险比(rr)。采用R软件(4.3.2版)进行统计分析。采用I2统计量评估异质性。结果:共纳入8项随机对照试验,共纳入早产儿2029例。与单用表面活性剂相比,气管内布地奈德联合表面活性剂可显著降低支气管肺发育不良的风险(RR: 0.70;95 % ci: 0.54-0.91;p = 0.007;I2 = 71.4 %),死亡率(RR: 0.81;95 % ci: 0.66-0.98;p = 0.029;I2 = 14.6 %),肺出血(RR: 0.58;95 % ci: 0.37-0.90;p = 0.015;I2 = 0 %)和动脉导管未闭(RR: 0.84;95 % ci: 0.75-0.94;p = 0.004;I2 = 0 %)。结论:本荟萃分析发现,与单用表面活性剂相比,气管内布地奈德联合表面活性剂可降低支气管肺发育不良、死亡率、肺出血和动脉导管未闭的风险。鉴于其减少早产相关肺部并发症的潜力,临床医生可能会考虑这种联合治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: Paediatric Respiratory Reviews offers authors the opportunity to submit their own editorials, educational reviews and short communications on topics relevant to paediatric respiratory medicine. These peer reviewed contributions will complement the commissioned reviews which will continue to form an integral part of the journal. Subjects covered include: • Epidemiology • Immunology and cell biology • Physiology • Occupational disorders • The role of allergens and pollutants A particular emphasis is given to the recommendation of "best practice" for primary care physicians and paediatricians. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews is aimed at general paediatricians but it should also be read by specialist paediatric physicians and nurses, respiratory physicians and general practitioners. It is a journal for those who are busy and do not have time to read systematically through literature, but who need to stay up to date in the field of paediatric respiratory and sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信