Evaluation of the preferred sleeping position as a risk factor for keratoconus asymmetry.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Dhiogo Cezar Corrêa, Daniel Oliveira Dantas, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Hamilton Moreira, Ricardo Noguera Louzada, Milton Ruiz Alves
{"title":"Evaluation of the preferred sleeping position as a risk factor for keratoconus asymmetry.","authors":"Dhiogo Cezar Corrêa, Daniel Oliveira Dantas, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Hamilton Moreira, Ricardo Noguera Louzada, Milton Ruiz Alves","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Identifying potential modifiable risk factors for keratoconus progression is crucial for better outcomes. This study suggests that sleeping position may contribute to interocular asymmetry in keratoconus, providing an actionable target for patient education and clinical management and underscoring the importance of sleep posture in slowing disease progression.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether the preferred sleeping position can contribute to interocular asymmetry of keratoconus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 patients (100 eyes) with grade I and II keratoconus (Amsler-Krumeich) and 40 individuals (80 eyes) without keratoconus. Corneal tomographic parameters from the Galilei G6 (keratometry plus curve [Steep K], mean keratometry [Sim K], thinner corneal thickness, central corneal thickness, Cone Location and Magnitude Index, dioptric asymmetry between the inferior and superior corneal hemispheres, and vertical coma) were obtained to assess interocular asymmetry. All participants answered a questionnaire about their preferred sleeping position. The eye positioned lower during sleep has been referred to as the dependent eye, and the eye positioned higher was classified as the nondependent eye, regardless of the sleeping position (lateral or ventral).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between dependent and nondependent eyes regarding the evaluated tomographic variables among individuals without keratoconus. However, in individuals with keratoconus, statistically significant differences were observed between dependent and nondependent eyes for the following parameters: Steep K (47.89 vs. 45.78 D, p=0.0047), Sim K (46.54 vs. 44.42 D, p=0.0016); thinnest corneal thickness (445.84 vs. 460.34 μm, p=0.0057), central corneal thickness (463.03 vs. 477.6 μm, p=0.0125), vertical coma (-1.98 vs. -1.41 μm, p=0.0448), and total coma (1.60 vs. 1.22 μm, p=0.0495).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that in individuals with keratoconus, the preferred sleeping position may contribute to keratoconus asymmetry in the dependent eye, regardless of whether the sleeping position is lateral or ventral.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance: Identifying potential modifiable risk factors for keratoconus progression is crucial for better outcomes. This study suggests that sleeping position may contribute to interocular asymmetry in keratoconus, providing an actionable target for patient education and clinical management and underscoring the importance of sleep posture in slowing disease progression.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate whether the preferred sleeping position can contribute to interocular asymmetry of keratoconus.

Methods: A clinical cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 patients (100 eyes) with grade I and II keratoconus (Amsler-Krumeich) and 40 individuals (80 eyes) without keratoconus. Corneal tomographic parameters from the Galilei G6 (keratometry plus curve [Steep K], mean keratometry [Sim K], thinner corneal thickness, central corneal thickness, Cone Location and Magnitude Index, dioptric asymmetry between the inferior and superior corneal hemispheres, and vertical coma) were obtained to assess interocular asymmetry. All participants answered a questionnaire about their preferred sleeping position. The eye positioned lower during sleep has been referred to as the dependent eye, and the eye positioned higher was classified as the nondependent eye, regardless of the sleeping position (lateral or ventral).

Results: There were no significant differences between dependent and nondependent eyes regarding the evaluated tomographic variables among individuals without keratoconus. However, in individuals with keratoconus, statistically significant differences were observed between dependent and nondependent eyes for the following parameters: Steep K (47.89 vs. 45.78 D, p=0.0047), Sim K (46.54 vs. 44.42 D, p=0.0016); thinnest corneal thickness (445.84 vs. 460.34 μm, p=0.0057), central corneal thickness (463.03 vs. 477.6 μm, p=0.0125), vertical coma (-1.98 vs. -1.41 μm, p=0.0448), and total coma (1.60 vs. 1.22 μm, p=0.0495).

Conclusions: This study suggests that in individuals with keratoconus, the preferred sleeping position may contribute to keratoconus asymmetry in the dependent eye, regardless of whether the sleeping position is lateral or ventral.

评价首选睡姿作为圆锥角膜不对称的危险因素。
意义:确定圆锥角膜进展的潜在可改变的危险因素对改善预后至关重要。本研究提示,睡眠姿势可能导致圆锥角膜的眼间不对称,为患者教育和临床管理提供了一个可行的目标,并强调了睡眠姿势在减缓疾病进展中的重要性。目的:探讨不同睡姿对圆锥角膜眼间不对称的影响。方法:对1、2级圆锥角膜(Amsler-Krumeich)患者50例(100眼)和非圆锥角膜患者40例(80眼)进行临床横断面研究。获得Galilei G6角膜层析参数(角膜测量加曲线[陡K],平均角膜测量[Sim K],薄角膜厚度,角膜中央厚度,锥体位置和星等指数,上下角膜半球屈光不对称性和垂直昏迷)以评估眼间不对称性。所有参与者都回答了一份关于他们喜欢的睡姿的问卷。睡眠时位置较低的眼睛被称为依赖眼,而位置较高的眼睛被归类为非依赖眼,无论睡姿(侧卧或腹卧)如何。结果:无圆锥角膜个体的依赖眼和非依赖眼在评估层析变量方面无显著差异。然而,在圆锥角膜患者中,依赖眼和非依赖眼在以下参数上的差异具有统计学意义:陡K(47.89比45.78 D, p=0.0047),暗K(46.54比44.42 D, p=0.0016);最薄角膜厚度(445.84 vs. 460.34 μm, p=0.0057)、角膜中央厚度(463.03 vs. 477.6 μm, p=0.0125)、垂直昏迷(-1.98 vs. -1.41 μm, p=0.0448)和总昏迷(1.60 vs. 1.22 μm, p=0.0495)。结论:本研究提示圆锥角膜患者,无论侧卧还是腹卧,首选睡姿都可能导致依赖眼圆锥角膜不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信