Exploratory research on occupational exposures and breast cancer risk in the CECILE study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lisa Leung, Anita Koushik, Emilie Cordina-Duverger, Jack Siemiatycki, Pascal Guénel
{"title":"Exploratory research on occupational exposures and breast cancer risk in the CECILE study.","authors":"Lisa Leung, Anita Koushik, Emilie Cordina-Duverger, Jack Siemiatycki, Pascal Guénel","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-110021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 'exploratory mode', to examine associations between occupational exposure to 49 prevalent agents and breast cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a French population-based case-control study on breast cancer (2005-2007), lifetime occupational histories of 1230 incident cases and 1315 controls were collected. An industrial hygienist coded each job held by a participant. Job codes were subsequently linked to the Canadian job-exposure matrix, and exposure level estimates for numerous agents were generated. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate associations between occupational exposure to 49 prevalent agents and breast cancer risk, adjusting for established breast cancer risk factors and selected sociodemographic covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased ORs, ranging between 1.33 and 2.39, were observed for women in the highest tertile of cumulative exposure versus unexposed for the following 12 agents: sodium carbonate, synthetic fibres, wool fibres, silk fibres, organic dyes and pigments, plastic dusts, plastics pyrolysis fumes, ozone, nitrogen oxides, anaesthetic gases, aliphatic ketones and mononuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. When stratified by menopausal status, the ORs for many of these agents were stronger among premenopausal versus postmenopausal women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest the possible role of some occupational agents in the aetiology of breast cancer. Further studies, based on large sample sizes and high-quality exposure assessment, are needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"139-147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2024-110021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In 'exploratory mode', to examine associations between occupational exposure to 49 prevalent agents and breast cancer risk.

Methods: In a French population-based case-control study on breast cancer (2005-2007), lifetime occupational histories of 1230 incident cases and 1315 controls were collected. An industrial hygienist coded each job held by a participant. Job codes were subsequently linked to the Canadian job-exposure matrix, and exposure level estimates for numerous agents were generated. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate associations between occupational exposure to 49 prevalent agents and breast cancer risk, adjusting for established breast cancer risk factors and selected sociodemographic covariates.

Results: Increased ORs, ranging between 1.33 and 2.39, were observed for women in the highest tertile of cumulative exposure versus unexposed for the following 12 agents: sodium carbonate, synthetic fibres, wool fibres, silk fibres, organic dyes and pigments, plastic dusts, plastics pyrolysis fumes, ozone, nitrogen oxides, anaesthetic gases, aliphatic ketones and mononuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. When stratified by menopausal status, the ORs for many of these agents were stronger among premenopausal versus postmenopausal women.

Conclusions: These findings suggest the possible role of some occupational agents in the aetiology of breast cancer. Further studies, based on large sample sizes and high-quality exposure assessment, are needed to confirm our findings.

CECILE研究中职业暴露与乳腺癌风险的探索性研究。
目的:以“探索性模式”,研究职业暴露于49种流行物质与乳腺癌风险之间的关系。方法:在法国一项以人群为基础的乳腺癌病例对照研究(2005-2007)中,收集了1230例病例和1315例对照者的终生职业史。一位工业卫生学家对参与者从事的每项工作进行编码。随后将工作代码与加拿大工作接触矩阵联系起来,并产生了许多代理人的接触水平估计数。多变量无条件逻辑回归用于估计职业暴露于49种流行药物与乳腺癌风险之间的关联,调整了已确定的乳腺癌风险因素和选定的社会人口统计学协变量。结果:与未暴露于以下12种物质的妇女相比,累积暴露在最高水平的妇女的ORs增加,范围在1.33至2.39之间:碳酸钠、合成纤维、羊毛纤维、丝绸纤维、有机染料和颜料、塑料粉尘、塑料热解烟雾、臭氧、氮氧化物、麻醉气体、脂肪族酮和单核芳香烃。当按绝经状态分层时,许多这些药物的ORs在绝经前妇女中比绝经后妇女更强。结论:这些发现提示了某些职业因子在乳腺癌病因学中的可能作用。需要基于大样本量和高质量暴露评估的进一步研究来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信