Meghan R Crimmins, Clark R Sims, David K Williams, Aline Andres, Sarah Sobik
{"title":"Breastfeeding beyond infancy supports adequate growth, development, and nutritional intake.","authors":"Meghan R Crimmins, Clark R Sims, David K Williams, Aline Andres, Sarah Sobik","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-04111-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the associations of breastfeeding beyond infancy (BBI, >1 year) on toddler growth, development, and diet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 185) of a prospective longitudinal study were categorized into 3 groups: formula fed (FF, N = 22), breastfed up to 12 months (BF, N = 108), and breastfed up to 24 months (PBF, N = 55). Data collected included demographics, anthropometrics, toddler Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ), and Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (BSID).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At age 24 months, linear modeling showed PBF children had lower weight-for-length z-scores in comparison to both FF and BF children. FF infants had lower HEI scores for total fruit compared to BF and PBF infants, whereas PBF infants had higher seafood HEI scores. Feeding responsibility was lower in BF parents than FF parents. Restriction was lower in BF and FF groups compared to PBF, and pressure feeding was less common in PBF. Developmental testing revealed no significant differences between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results strengthen evidence that BBI supports adequate childhood growth, nutritional status, and development. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of BBI on health status in childhood.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial id: </strong>#NCT01131117 IMPACT: This research supports the current recommendations to continue breastfeeding up to 24 months. This research indicates that breastfeeding beyond infancy supports adequate growth, nutritional status, and overall development. This article adds to the growing body of literature that breastfeeding beyond 12 months should be supported. This article is one of the first prospective longitudinal studies to investigate breastfeeding beyond infancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04111-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: The objective of this study was to examine the associations of breastfeeding beyond infancy (BBI, >1 year) on toddler growth, development, and diet.
Methods: Participants (n = 185) of a prospective longitudinal study were categorized into 3 groups: formula fed (FF, N = 22), breastfed up to 12 months (BF, N = 108), and breastfed up to 24 months (PBF, N = 55). Data collected included demographics, anthropometrics, toddler Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ), and Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (BSID).
Results: At age 24 months, linear modeling showed PBF children had lower weight-for-length z-scores in comparison to both FF and BF children. FF infants had lower HEI scores for total fruit compared to BF and PBF infants, whereas PBF infants had higher seafood HEI scores. Feeding responsibility was lower in BF parents than FF parents. Restriction was lower in BF and FF groups compared to PBF, and pressure feeding was less common in PBF. Developmental testing revealed no significant differences between the three groups.
Conclusion: These results strengthen evidence that BBI supports adequate childhood growth, nutritional status, and development. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of BBI on health status in childhood.
Clinical trial id: #NCT01131117 IMPACT: This research supports the current recommendations to continue breastfeeding up to 24 months. This research indicates that breastfeeding beyond infancy supports adequate growth, nutritional status, and overall development. This article adds to the growing body of literature that breastfeeding beyond 12 months should be supported. This article is one of the first prospective longitudinal studies to investigate breastfeeding beyond infancy.
背景和目的:本研究的目的是研究婴儿期(BBI, bb0 - 1岁)以后母乳喂养与幼儿生长、发育和饮食的关系。方法:将185名前瞻性纵向研究参与者分为3组:配方奶喂养组(FF, n = 22)、母乳喂养至12个月组(BF, n = 108)和母乳喂养至24个月组(PBF, n = 55)。收集的数据包括人口统计学、人体测量学、幼儿健康饮食指数(HEI)、儿童喂养问卷(CFQ)和婴幼儿发育贝利量表(BSID)。结果:在24个月大时,线性模型显示PBF儿童与FF和BF儿童相比具有较低的体重-长度z分数。与BF和PBF婴儿相比,FF婴儿的总水果HEI得分较低,而PBF婴儿的海鲜HEI得分较高。BF父母的喂养责任低于FF父母。与PBF相比,BF组和FF组的限制较低,PBF组的压力喂养较少。发展测试显示三组之间没有显著差异。结论:这些结果加强了BBI支持儿童适当生长、营养状况和发育的证据。需要进一步的研究来评估BBI对儿童健康状况的影响。影响:这项研究支持目前关于继续母乳喂养至24个月的建议。这项研究表明,母乳喂养超过婴儿期支持足够的生长,营养状况和全面发展。这篇文章补充了越来越多的文献,认为12个月以上的母乳喂养应该得到支持。这篇文章是调查婴儿期以后母乳喂养的第一项前瞻性纵向研究之一。
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and
disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques
relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies