{"title":"Temporal integration and stream segregation because of differences in base tones.","authors":"Ken Suzutani, Tetsuya Shiga, Hiroshi Hoshino, Ayaka Arakawa, Yuhei Mori, Kazuko Kanno, Yuichi Takahashi, Tomohiro Wada, Aya Sato, Shuntaro Itagaki, Itaru Miura, Hirooki Yabe","doi":"10.1097/WNR.0000000000002173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Humans live surrounded by many sounds and have the ability to filter out various background sounds. It involves stream segregation and temporal integration. When the reference frequency is set to 3000 Hz, stream segregation will precede temporal integration when the frequency difference is 1000 Hz or larger; however, there is no report that examines whether the threshold of frequency difference at which stream segregation occurs before temporal integration is similar to different base tones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created 10 blocks of tone sequences in which high tones and low tones were alternated with a constant stimulus onset asynchrony of 120 ms. In the first group (group A), the frequency of base tones was fixed at 3000 Hz. In the second group (group B), the frequency of base tones was fixed at 2000 Hz. The frequency of pair tones was set at 3000, 2750, 2500, 2250, and 2000 Hz in each block, respectively presented with six blocks of alternating high tones and low tones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group A, the mean voltage in response to omission was significantly lower than the mean voltage in response to opposite tones except in the fifth block. On the other hand, in group B, the mean voltage in response to omission was significantly lower than the mean voltage in response to opposite tones in all blocks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated that whether a temporal window of integration or stream segregation is preferred depends on the base tone's Hz.</p>","PeriodicalId":19213,"journal":{"name":"Neuroreport","volume":" ","pages":"532-539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroreport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000002173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Humans live surrounded by many sounds and have the ability to filter out various background sounds. It involves stream segregation and temporal integration. When the reference frequency is set to 3000 Hz, stream segregation will precede temporal integration when the frequency difference is 1000 Hz or larger; however, there is no report that examines whether the threshold of frequency difference at which stream segregation occurs before temporal integration is similar to different base tones.
Methods: We created 10 blocks of tone sequences in which high tones and low tones were alternated with a constant stimulus onset asynchrony of 120 ms. In the first group (group A), the frequency of base tones was fixed at 3000 Hz. In the second group (group B), the frequency of base tones was fixed at 2000 Hz. The frequency of pair tones was set at 3000, 2750, 2500, 2250, and 2000 Hz in each block, respectively presented with six blocks of alternating high tones and low tones.
Results: In group A, the mean voltage in response to omission was significantly lower than the mean voltage in response to opposite tones except in the fifth block. On the other hand, in group B, the mean voltage in response to omission was significantly lower than the mean voltage in response to opposite tones in all blocks.
Conclusions: Our results indicated that whether a temporal window of integration or stream segregation is preferred depends on the base tone's Hz.
期刊介绍:
NeuroReport is a channel for rapid communication of new findings in neuroscience. It is a forum for the publication of short but complete reports of important studies that require very fast publication. Papers are accepted on the basis of the novelty of their finding, on their significance for neuroscience and on a clear need for rapid publication. Preliminary communications are not suitable for the Journal. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
The core interest of the Journal is on studies that cast light on how the brain (and the whole of the nervous system) works.
We aim to give authors a decision on their submission within 2-5 weeks, and all accepted articles appear in the next issue to press.