Insights and implications from a comparative analysis of in vitro fertilization success in Cavioidea and Muroidea rodents.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Lhara Ricarliany Medeiros de Oliveira, Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira
{"title":"Insights and implications from a comparative analysis of in vitro fertilization success in Cavioidea and Muroidea rodents.","authors":"Lhara Ricarliany Medeiros de Oliveira, Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira","doi":"10.1177/00236772251331683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro fertilization (IVF) is an assisted reproduction technique widely used due to its capacity to generate more offspring within a brief timeframe while simultaneously providing fundamental physiological data through gamete interactions. However, its suboptimal development in most species is challenging when IVF is applied to rodents. Despite numerous studies focusing on the Cavioidea and Muroidea superfamilies, some species struggle to achieve satisfactory cleavage rates, whereas others obtain over 90% efficiency with live offspring. Efforts to enhance these rates include adopting methodologies commonly used in other mammals or developing entirely new protocols. Nonetheless, the distinct morphophysiological differences among these animals necessitate careful consideration to avoid overgeneralization during optimization. Therefore, we aimed to review what has been established for the two most researched rodent superfamilies, Cavioidea and Muroidea, regarding the steps of IVF, such as gamete manipulation and embryonic development, to understand better the protocol diversification in the rodent order and how it affects IVF efficiency. After an extensive analysis of data accumulated over the years, it becomes evident that the Muroidea superfamily is used more extensively in reproductive studies than the Cavioidea. Furthermore, IVF procedures achieve total efficiency in only one rodent species, the laboratory mouse (<i>Mus musculus</i>). Consequently, developing a successful IVF technique across rodent species requires substantial modifications to optimize species-specific early steps - a challenge complicated by difficulties in obtaining viable gametes during the initial stages and the limited research interest in species without significant commercial value, such as wild rodents.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"236772251331683"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772251331683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is an assisted reproduction technique widely used due to its capacity to generate more offspring within a brief timeframe while simultaneously providing fundamental physiological data through gamete interactions. However, its suboptimal development in most species is challenging when IVF is applied to rodents. Despite numerous studies focusing on the Cavioidea and Muroidea superfamilies, some species struggle to achieve satisfactory cleavage rates, whereas others obtain over 90% efficiency with live offspring. Efforts to enhance these rates include adopting methodologies commonly used in other mammals or developing entirely new protocols. Nonetheless, the distinct morphophysiological differences among these animals necessitate careful consideration to avoid overgeneralization during optimization. Therefore, we aimed to review what has been established for the two most researched rodent superfamilies, Cavioidea and Muroidea, regarding the steps of IVF, such as gamete manipulation and embryonic development, to understand better the protocol diversification in the rodent order and how it affects IVF efficiency. After an extensive analysis of data accumulated over the years, it becomes evident that the Muroidea superfamily is used more extensively in reproductive studies than the Cavioidea. Furthermore, IVF procedures achieve total efficiency in only one rodent species, the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus). Consequently, developing a successful IVF technique across rodent species requires substantial modifications to optimize species-specific early steps - a challenge complicated by difficulties in obtaining viable gametes during the initial stages and the limited research interest in species without significant commercial value, such as wild rodents.

洞见和启示从体外受精成功的比较分析的鼠类和鼠。
体外受精(IVF)是一种广泛使用的辅助生殖技术,因为它能够在短时间内产生更多的后代,同时通过配子相互作用提供基本的生理数据。然而,当体外受精应用于啮齿动物时,其在大多数物种中的次优发育是具有挑战性的。尽管大量的研究集中在Cavioidea和Muroidea超科,但一些物种难以达到令人满意的卵裂率,而另一些物种的活子代卵裂率超过90%。提高这些比率的努力包括采用其他哺乳动物常用的方法或制定全新的方案。尽管如此,这些动物之间不同的形态生理差异需要仔细考虑,以避免在优化过程中过度一般化。因此,我们旨在回顾研究最多的两个啮齿动物超家族Cavioidea和Muroidea在体外受精的步骤,如配子操作和胚胎发育方面的进展,以更好地了解啮齿动物顺序的协议多样化及其对体外受精效率的影响。经过多年积累的大量数据分析,很明显,Muroidea超家族在生殖研究中比Cavioidea使用得更广泛。此外,体外受精程序只在一种啮齿类动物,即实验室小鼠(小家鼠)中达到了完全的效率。因此,开发一种成功的跨啮齿动物物种的体外受精技术需要进行大量的修改,以优化物种特异性的早期步骤——这一挑战由于在初始阶段难以获得可行的配子以及对没有重大商业价值的物种(如野生啮齿动物)的研究兴趣有限而复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信