Variability in the Recommendations for Management of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis and Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease: Review of Institutional Algorithms of Pediatric Hospitals Across the United States.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Amr Elgehiny, Mariam Z Quraishi, Aravind Yadav, Lakshmi V Srivaths, Olayinka Okeleji, Deborah L Brown, Neethu M Menon
{"title":"Variability in the Recommendations for Management of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis and Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease: Review of Institutional Algorithms of Pediatric Hospitals Across the United States.","authors":"Amr Elgehiny, Mariam Z Quraishi, Aravind Yadav, Lakshmi V Srivaths, Olayinka Okeleji, Deborah L Brown, Neethu M Menon","doi":"10.1097/MPH.0000000000003052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to review institutional algorithms for vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and acute chest syndrome (ACS) in pediatric sickle cell disease (SCD), comparing them to each other and to national recommendations. Algorithms collected from children's hospitals across the country were compared with recommendations made by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 2014 and the American Society of Hematology 2020 regarding management of VOC/ACS in SCD. Review of 37 VOC and 17 ACS algorithms from 40 children's hospitals showed that most followed national guidelines for diagnostic evaluation of VOC/ACS. Parenteral opioids and NSAIDs were recommended by all VOC algorithms, with variations in dosing and administration. Intranasal fentanyl was recommended by 31 algorithms. Incentive spirometry was included in 16 of 17 ACS algorithms, but only in 11 of 37 VOC algorithms. Antibiotics were recommended by all ACS algorithms, but 4 used regimens were different from national recommendations. Most ACS algorithms had recommendations regarding transfusion, but with considerable variability. Intravenous fluid management strategies were highly variable, and hypotonic fluids were recommended in 6 VOC and 4 ACS algorithms. Overall, internal algorithms for pediatric SCD showed variability compared with each other and with national guidelines, likely due to the lack of robust evidence supporting specific recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000003052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to review institutional algorithms for vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and acute chest syndrome (ACS) in pediatric sickle cell disease (SCD), comparing them to each other and to national recommendations. Algorithms collected from children's hospitals across the country were compared with recommendations made by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 2014 and the American Society of Hematology 2020 regarding management of VOC/ACS in SCD. Review of 37 VOC and 17 ACS algorithms from 40 children's hospitals showed that most followed national guidelines for diagnostic evaluation of VOC/ACS. Parenteral opioids and NSAIDs were recommended by all VOC algorithms, with variations in dosing and administration. Intranasal fentanyl was recommended by 31 algorithms. Incentive spirometry was included in 16 of 17 ACS algorithms, but only in 11 of 37 VOC algorithms. Antibiotics were recommended by all ACS algorithms, but 4 used regimens were different from national recommendations. Most ACS algorithms had recommendations regarding transfusion, but with considerable variability. Intravenous fluid management strategies were highly variable, and hypotonic fluids were recommended in 6 VOC and 4 ACS algorithms. Overall, internal algorithms for pediatric SCD showed variability compared with each other and with national guidelines, likely due to the lack of robust evidence supporting specific recommendations.

镰状细胞病血管闭塞危象和急性胸综合征管理建议的差异:美国儿科医院机构算法综述
本研究旨在回顾儿童镰状细胞病(SCD)中血管闭塞危像(VOC)和急性胸综合征(ACS)的机构算法,并将它们相互比较并与国家建议进行比较。从全国儿童医院收集的算法与2014年国家心肺血液研究所和2020年美国血液学学会关于SCD中VOC/ACS管理的建议进行了比较。对来自40家儿童医院的37种VOC和17种ACS算法的回顾表明,大多数都遵循了VOC/ACS诊断评估的国家指南。所有VOC算法都推荐注射阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药,但剂量和给药方式有所不同。31种算法推荐芬太尼鼻内用药。17个ACS算法中有16个包含激进性肺活量测定,但37个VOC算法中只有11个包含激进性肺活量测定。所有ACS算法均推荐使用抗生素,但4种使用方案与国家推荐方案存在差异。大多数ACS算法有关于输血的建议,但有相当大的可变性。静脉输液管理策略变化很大,在6种VOC和4种ACS算法中推荐低渗液。总的来说,儿科SCD的内部算法与其他和国家指南相比显示出可变性,可能是由于缺乏支持具体建议的有力证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
415
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JPHO) reports on major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and blood diseases in children. The journal publishes original research, commentaries, historical insights, and clinical and laboratory observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信