Mariluz Rojo Domingo, Deondre D Do, Christopher C Conlin, Aditya Bagrodia, Tristan Barrett, Madison T Baxter, Matthew Cooperberg, Felix Feng, Michael E Hahn, Mukesh Harisinghani, Gary Hollenberg, Juan Javier-Desloges, Karoline Kallis, Sophia Kamran, Christopher J Kane, Dimitri Kessler, Joshua Kuperman, Kang-Lung Lee, Jonathan Levine, Michael A Liss, Daniel Ja Margolis, Ian Matthews, Paul M Murphy, Nabih Nakrour, Michael Ohliger, Courtney Ollison, Thomas Osinski, Anthony James Pamatmat, Isabella R Pompa, Rebecca Rakow-Penner, Jacob L Roberts, Ahmed S Shabaik, Yuze Song, David Song, Clare M Tempany, Shaun Trecarten, Natasha Wehrli, Eric P Weinberg, Sean Woolen, George Xu, Allison Y Zhong, Anders M Dale, Tyler M Seibert
{"title":"Restriction Spectrum Imaging as a quantitative biomarker for prostate cancer with reliable positive predictive value.","authors":"Mariluz Rojo Domingo, Deondre D Do, Christopher C Conlin, Aditya Bagrodia, Tristan Barrett, Madison T Baxter, Matthew Cooperberg, Felix Feng, Michael E Hahn, Mukesh Harisinghani, Gary Hollenberg, Juan Javier-Desloges, Karoline Kallis, Sophia Kamran, Christopher J Kane, Dimitri Kessler, Joshua Kuperman, Kang-Lung Lee, Jonathan Levine, Michael A Liss, Daniel Ja Margolis, Ian Matthews, Paul M Murphy, Nabih Nakrour, Michael Ohliger, Courtney Ollison, Thomas Osinski, Anthony James Pamatmat, Isabella R Pompa, Rebecca Rakow-Penner, Jacob L Roberts, Ahmed S Shabaik, Yuze Song, David Song, Clare M Tempany, Shaun Trecarten, Natasha Wehrli, Eric P Weinberg, Sean Woolen, George Xu, Allison Y Zhong, Anders M Dale, Tyler M Seibert","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Positive predictive value of PI-RADS for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group [GG]≥2) varies widely between radiologists. The Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a biophysics-based metric derived from diffusion MRI that could be an objectively interpretable biomarker for csPCa. We aimed to evaluate performance of RSIrs for patient-level detection of csPCa in a large and heterogenous dataset, and to combine RSIrs with clinical and imaging parameters for csPCa detection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>At 7 centers, participants underwent prostate MRI between January of 2016 and March of 2024. We calculated patient-level csPCa probability based on maximum RSIrs in the prostate and compared patient-level csPCa detection to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and PI-RADS using area under the ROC curve (AUC). We also evaluated csPCa discrimination by grade group and combining RSIrs with clinical risk factors via multivariable regression.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Among patients that met the inclusion criteria (n=1892), probability of csPCa increased with higher RSIrs. Among biopsy-naïve patients (n=877), AUCs for GG≥2 vs. non-csPCa were: RSIrs=0.73 (0.69-0.76), ADC=0.54 (0.50-0.57), and PI-RADS=0.75 (0.71-0.78). RSIrs significantly outperformed ADC (<i>p</i><0.01) and was comparable to PI-RADS (<i>p</i>=0.31). RSIrs and PI-RADS combined outperformed either alone. The model with RSIrs, PI-RADS, age, and PSA density achieved the best discrimination of csPCa. RSIrs is an accurate and reliable quantitative biomarker that performs better than conventional ADC and comparably to expert-defined PI-RADS for patient-level detection of csPCa. RSIrs provides objective estimates of probability of csPCa that do not require radiology expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"101097JU0000000000004611"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004611","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Positive predictive value of PI-RADS for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group [GG]≥2) varies widely between radiologists. The Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a biophysics-based metric derived from diffusion MRI that could be an objectively interpretable biomarker for csPCa. We aimed to evaluate performance of RSIrs for patient-level detection of csPCa in a large and heterogenous dataset, and to combine RSIrs with clinical and imaging parameters for csPCa detection.
Materials and methods: At 7 centers, participants underwent prostate MRI between January of 2016 and March of 2024. We calculated patient-level csPCa probability based on maximum RSIrs in the prostate and compared patient-level csPCa detection to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and PI-RADS using area under the ROC curve (AUC). We also evaluated csPCa discrimination by grade group and combining RSIrs with clinical risk factors via multivariable regression.
Results and conclusions: Among patients that met the inclusion criteria (n=1892), probability of csPCa increased with higher RSIrs. Among biopsy-naïve patients (n=877), AUCs for GG≥2 vs. non-csPCa were: RSIrs=0.73 (0.69-0.76), ADC=0.54 (0.50-0.57), and PI-RADS=0.75 (0.71-0.78). RSIrs significantly outperformed ADC (p<0.01) and was comparable to PI-RADS (p=0.31). RSIrs and PI-RADS combined outperformed either alone. The model with RSIrs, PI-RADS, age, and PSA density achieved the best discrimination of csPCa. RSIrs is an accurate and reliable quantitative biomarker that performs better than conventional ADC and comparably to expert-defined PI-RADS for patient-level detection of csPCa. RSIrs provides objective estimates of probability of csPCa that do not require radiology expertise.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.