Restriction Spectrum Imaging as a quantitative biomarker for prostate cancer with reliable positive predictive value.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mariluz Rojo Domingo, Deondre D Do, Christopher C Conlin, Aditya Bagrodia, Tristan Barrett, Madison T Baxter, Matthew Cooperberg, Felix Feng, Michael E Hahn, Mukesh Harisinghani, Gary Hollenberg, Juan Javier-Desloges, Karoline Kallis, Sophia Kamran, Christopher J Kane, Dimitri Kessler, Joshua Kuperman, Kang-Lung Lee, Jonathan Levine, Michael A Liss, Daniel Ja Margolis, Ian Matthews, Paul M Murphy, Nabih Nakrour, Michael Ohliger, Courtney Ollison, Thomas Osinski, Anthony James Pamatmat, Isabella R Pompa, Rebecca Rakow-Penner, Jacob L Roberts, Ahmed S Shabaik, Yuze Song, David Song, Clare M Tempany, Shaun Trecarten, Natasha Wehrli, Eric P Weinberg, Sean Woolen, George Xu, Allison Y Zhong, Anders M Dale, Tyler M Seibert
{"title":"Restriction Spectrum Imaging as a quantitative biomarker for prostate cancer with reliable positive predictive value.","authors":"Mariluz Rojo Domingo, Deondre D Do, Christopher C Conlin, Aditya Bagrodia, Tristan Barrett, Madison T Baxter, Matthew Cooperberg, Felix Feng, Michael E Hahn, Mukesh Harisinghani, Gary Hollenberg, Juan Javier-Desloges, Karoline Kallis, Sophia Kamran, Christopher J Kane, Dimitri Kessler, Joshua Kuperman, Kang-Lung Lee, Jonathan Levine, Michael A Liss, Daniel Ja Margolis, Ian Matthews, Paul M Murphy, Nabih Nakrour, Michael Ohliger, Courtney Ollison, Thomas Osinski, Anthony James Pamatmat, Isabella R Pompa, Rebecca Rakow-Penner, Jacob L Roberts, Ahmed S Shabaik, Yuze Song, David Song, Clare M Tempany, Shaun Trecarten, Natasha Wehrli, Eric P Weinberg, Sean Woolen, George Xu, Allison Y Zhong, Anders M Dale, Tyler M Seibert","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Positive predictive value of PI-RADS for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group [GG]≥2) varies widely between radiologists. The Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a biophysics-based metric derived from diffusion MRI that could be an objectively interpretable biomarker for csPCa. We aimed to evaluate performance of RSIrs for patient-level detection of csPCa in a large and heterogenous dataset, and to combine RSIrs with clinical and imaging parameters for csPCa detection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>At 7 centers, participants underwent prostate MRI between January of 2016 and March of 2024. We calculated patient-level csPCa probability based on maximum RSIrs in the prostate and compared patient-level csPCa detection to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and PI-RADS using area under the ROC curve (AUC). We also evaluated csPCa discrimination by grade group and combining RSIrs with clinical risk factors via multivariable regression.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Among patients that met the inclusion criteria (n=1892), probability of csPCa increased with higher RSIrs. Among biopsy-naïve patients (n=877), AUCs for GG≥2 vs. non-csPCa were: RSIrs=0.73 (0.69-0.76), ADC=0.54 (0.50-0.57), and PI-RADS=0.75 (0.71-0.78). RSIrs significantly outperformed ADC (<i>p</i><0.01) and was comparable to PI-RADS (<i>p</i>=0.31). RSIrs and PI-RADS combined outperformed either alone. The model with RSIrs, PI-RADS, age, and PSA density achieved the best discrimination of csPCa. RSIrs is an accurate and reliable quantitative biomarker that performs better than conventional ADC and comparably to expert-defined PI-RADS for patient-level detection of csPCa. RSIrs provides objective estimates of probability of csPCa that do not require radiology expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"101097JU0000000000004611"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004611","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Positive predictive value of PI-RADS for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, grade group [GG]≥2) varies widely between radiologists. The Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs) is a biophysics-based metric derived from diffusion MRI that could be an objectively interpretable biomarker for csPCa. We aimed to evaluate performance of RSIrs for patient-level detection of csPCa in a large and heterogenous dataset, and to combine RSIrs with clinical and imaging parameters for csPCa detection.

Materials and methods: At 7 centers, participants underwent prostate MRI between January of 2016 and March of 2024. We calculated patient-level csPCa probability based on maximum RSIrs in the prostate and compared patient-level csPCa detection to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and PI-RADS using area under the ROC curve (AUC). We also evaluated csPCa discrimination by grade group and combining RSIrs with clinical risk factors via multivariable regression.

Results and conclusions: Among patients that met the inclusion criteria (n=1892), probability of csPCa increased with higher RSIrs. Among biopsy-naïve patients (n=877), AUCs for GG≥2 vs. non-csPCa were: RSIrs=0.73 (0.69-0.76), ADC=0.54 (0.50-0.57), and PI-RADS=0.75 (0.71-0.78). RSIrs significantly outperformed ADC (p<0.01) and was comparable to PI-RADS (p=0.31). RSIrs and PI-RADS combined outperformed either alone. The model with RSIrs, PI-RADS, age, and PSA density achieved the best discrimination of csPCa. RSIrs is an accurate and reliable quantitative biomarker that performs better than conventional ADC and comparably to expert-defined PI-RADS for patient-level detection of csPCa. RSIrs provides objective estimates of probability of csPCa that do not require radiology expertise.

限制性光谱成像作为前列腺癌定量生物标志物具有可靠的阳性预测价值。
目的:PI-RADS对临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa,分级组[GG]≥2)的阳性预测值在不同放射科医师之间差异很大。限制光谱成像限制评分(RSIrs)是一种基于生物物理学的指标,来源于扩散MRI,可以作为csPCa的客观可解释的生物标志物。我们的目的是在一个大型的异构数据集中评估RSIrs在患者水平检测csPCa的性能,并将RSIrs与csPCa检测的临床和成像参数相结合。材料和方法:在2016年1月至2024年3月期间,在7个中心,参与者接受了前列腺MRI检查。我们根据前列腺最大RSIrs计算患者水平csPCa概率,并使用ROC曲线下面积(AUC)将患者水平csPCa检测与表观扩散系数(ADC)和PI-RADS进行比较。我们还通过多变量回归评估了分级组对csPCa的歧视,并将RSIrs与临床危险因素相结合。结果和结论:在符合纳入标准的患者中(n=1892), csPCa的概率随着RSIrs的升高而增加。在biopsy-naïve患者(n=877)中,GG≥2与非cspca的auc分别为:RSIrs=0.73 (0.69-0.76), ADC=0.54 (0.50-0.57), PI-RADS=0.75(0.71-0.78)。RSIrs显著优于ADC (pp=0.31)。RSIrs和PI-RADS联合使用的表现优于单独使用。RSIrs、PI-RADS、年龄、PSA密度对csPCa的鉴别效果最好。RSIrs是一种准确可靠的定量生物标志物,在患者水平检测csPCa方面,其表现优于传统ADC,也优于专家定义的PI-RADS。RSIrs提供了不需要放射学专业知识的csPCa概率的客观估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信