Comparison of the determination of cortisol in canine saliva by chemiluminescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Maike Schroers, Yuri Zablotski, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg
{"title":"Comparison of the determination of cortisol in canine saliva by chemiluminescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.","authors":"Maike Schroers, Yuri Zablotski, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg","doi":"10.1177/10406387251327413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We determined saliva cortisol concentrations (SCCs) in samples from 36 dogs using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) before and after a 10-min veterinary visit. The median cortisol concentration of the 77 samples analyzed with CLIA was 1.34 nmol/L, and the concentration of samples analyzed with LC-MS/MS was 1.30 nmol/L. With an intercept (a) of -0.06 (95% CI: -0.16 to 0.02) and a slope (b) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97) the Passing-Bablok regression revealed that there were no significant systematic and proportional differences between the 2 methods. In the Bland-Altman analysis, the bias was 0.08 nmol/L (95% CI: -0.38 to 0.54 nmol/L) between the 2 methods. Comparing the hormone levels in the saliva of 36 dogs before and after a veterinary visit, the CLIA method had a mean difference of 0.03 nmol/L (95% CI: -1.72 to 4.75 nmol/L; <i>p</i> = 0.35) and the LC-MS/MS method a mean difference of 0.12 nmol/L (95% CI 95%: -2.43 to 4.40 nmol/L; <i>p</i> = 0.62). Comparison of cortisol changes before (<i>p</i> = 0.86) and after (<i>p =</i> 0.79) the veterinary visit revealed no differences in using either the CLIA or LC-MS/MS methods. There was also no difference in the assessment of hormone increase or decrease between CLIA (<i>p</i> = 0.72) and LC-MS/MS (<i>p</i> = 0.17). Overall, the measurement of SCC in dogs by either CLIA or LC-MS/MS provided comparable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":17579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"10406387251327413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387251327413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We determined saliva cortisol concentrations (SCCs) in samples from 36 dogs using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) before and after a 10-min veterinary visit. The median cortisol concentration of the 77 samples analyzed with CLIA was 1.34 nmol/L, and the concentration of samples analyzed with LC-MS/MS was 1.30 nmol/L. With an intercept (a) of -0.06 (95% CI: -0.16 to 0.02) and a slope (b) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97) the Passing-Bablok regression revealed that there were no significant systematic and proportional differences between the 2 methods. In the Bland-Altman analysis, the bias was 0.08 nmol/L (95% CI: -0.38 to 0.54 nmol/L) between the 2 methods. Comparing the hormone levels in the saliva of 36 dogs before and after a veterinary visit, the CLIA method had a mean difference of 0.03 nmol/L (95% CI: -1.72 to 4.75 nmol/L; p = 0.35) and the LC-MS/MS method a mean difference of 0.12 nmol/L (95% CI 95%: -2.43 to 4.40 nmol/L; p = 0.62). Comparison of cortisol changes before (p = 0.86) and after (p = 0.79) the veterinary visit revealed no differences in using either the CLIA or LC-MS/MS methods. There was also no difference in the assessment of hormone increase or decrease between CLIA (p = 0.72) and LC-MS/MS (p = 0.17). Overall, the measurement of SCC in dogs by either CLIA or LC-MS/MS provided comparable results.

化学发光免疫分析法与液相色谱-串联质谱法测定犬唾液中皮质醇的比较。
我们使用化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)和液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)测定了36只狗在兽医就诊前后10分钟的唾液皮质醇浓度(SCCs)。CLIA分析的77个样品的皮质醇浓度中位数为1.34 nmol/L, LC-MS/MS分析的样品浓度中位数为1.30 nmol/L。Passing-Bablok回归的截距(a)为-0.06 (95% CI: -0.16至0.02),斜率(b)为0.97 (95% CI: 0.90至0.97),显示两种方法之间没有显著的系统和比例差异。在Bland-Altman分析中,两种方法之间的偏差为0.08 nmol/L (95% CI: -0.38至0.54 nmol/L)。比较36只狗在兽医就诊前后唾液中的激素水平,CLIA方法的平均差异为0.03 nmol/L (95% CI: -1.72至4.75 nmol/L;p = 0.35)和LC-MS/MS方法的平均差异为0.12 nmol/L (95% CI 95%: -2.43至4.40 nmol/L;p = 0.62)。比较兽医就诊前(p = 0.86)和之后(p = 0.79)的皮质醇变化,CLIA和LC-MS/MS方法均无差异。CLIA (p = 0.72)和LC-MS/MS (p = 0.17)对激素增加或减少的评估也无差异。总的来说,通过CLIA或LC-MS/MS测量狗的SCC提供了可比的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation (J Vet Diagn Invest) is an international peer-reviewed journal published bimonthly in English by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD). JVDI is devoted to all aspects of veterinary laboratory diagnostic science including the major disciplines of anatomic pathology, bacteriology/mycology, clinical pathology, epidemiology, immunology, laboratory information management, molecular biology, parasitology, public health, toxicology, and virology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信