Bond Strength of Silane-Containing Universal Bonding Agents to Lithium Disilicate.

Q2 Dentistry
Daniel L Tannen, Adam J Wallum, Terrell M Mitchell, James J Renda, Kraig S Vandewalle
{"title":"Bond Strength of Silane-Containing Universal Bonding Agents to Lithium Disilicate.","authors":"Daniel L Tannen, Adam J Wallum, Terrell M Mitchell, James J Renda, Kraig S Vandewalle","doi":"10.4317/jced.62011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength to lithium disilicate of four silane-containing universal adhesives (SUAs): Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (3M), Scotchbond Universal Adhesive Plus (3M), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray), and Universal Bond II (Tokuyama), with or without the use of a separate silane primer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Lithium disilicate blocks (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were sectioned to create 4 equal partitions. Blocks were then crystallized and mounted in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes. The blocks were steam cleaned, subjected to 5% hydrofluoric acid etch, rinsed, and prepared with or without silane application. Resin cement was applied to prepared blocks within standardized silicone tubing matrices and light-cured forming four resin cement specimens per block and twelve specimens per group (n=12). The dual-cure resin cement with and without the use of silane served as a positive and negative control, respectively. The tubing was removed and then the specimens were subjected to 500 thermocycles. The specimens were loaded perpendicularly in a universal testing machine with a shear force until bonding failure. The mean microshear bond strength was calculated per group and analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (alpha=0.05). Following testing, each specimen was examined to determine failure mode.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for Universal Bond II, an application of silane resulted in a significant increase in bond strength (<i>p</i><0.05) when using the SUAs. Without the use of a silane, Universal Bond II had significantly greater bond strength (<i>p</i><0.0001) than all other SUAs. All the SUAs without the use of silane resulted in lower bond strength (except UB) compared to the typical clinical practice of the use of silane alone. Greater mixed and cohesive failures were observed with groups that used silane.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Silane-containing universal bonding agents are being marketed in lieu of silane application on the intaglio surface of lithium disilicate prior to cementation. The results from this study indicate that using SUAs (except Universal Bond II) in this manner may decrease bond strength of the interface between lithium disilicate and resin cement. <b>Key words:</b>Universal bonding agent, silane, lithium disilicate, bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 4","pages":"e358-e365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength to lithium disilicate of four silane-containing universal adhesives (SUAs): Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (3M), Scotchbond Universal Adhesive Plus (3M), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray), and Universal Bond II (Tokuyama), with or without the use of a separate silane primer.

Material and methods: Lithium disilicate blocks (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were sectioned to create 4 equal partitions. Blocks were then crystallized and mounted in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes. The blocks were steam cleaned, subjected to 5% hydrofluoric acid etch, rinsed, and prepared with or without silane application. Resin cement was applied to prepared blocks within standardized silicone tubing matrices and light-cured forming four resin cement specimens per block and twelve specimens per group (n=12). The dual-cure resin cement with and without the use of silane served as a positive and negative control, respectively. The tubing was removed and then the specimens were subjected to 500 thermocycles. The specimens were loaded perpendicularly in a universal testing machine with a shear force until bonding failure. The mean microshear bond strength was calculated per group and analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (alpha=0.05). Following testing, each specimen was examined to determine failure mode.

Results: Except for Universal Bond II, an application of silane resulted in a significant increase in bond strength (p<0.05) when using the SUAs. Without the use of a silane, Universal Bond II had significantly greater bond strength (p<0.0001) than all other SUAs. All the SUAs without the use of silane resulted in lower bond strength (except UB) compared to the typical clinical practice of the use of silane alone. Greater mixed and cohesive failures were observed with groups that used silane.

Conclusions: Silane-containing universal bonding agents are being marketed in lieu of silane application on the intaglio surface of lithium disilicate prior to cementation. The results from this study indicate that using SUAs (except Universal Bond II) in this manner may decrease bond strength of the interface between lithium disilicate and resin cement. Key words:Universal bonding agent, silane, lithium disilicate, bond strength.

含硅烷通用键合剂与二硅酸锂的键合强度。
背景:本研究的目的是评估四种含硅烷的通用粘合剂(SUAs): Scotchbond universal Adhesive (3M)、Scotchbond universal Adhesive Plus (3M)、Clearfil universal bond Quick (Kuraray)和universal bond II (Tokuyama),在使用或不使用单独的硅烷底漆的情况下,与二硅酸锂的微剪切粘接强度。材料和方法:将二硅酸锂块(IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar)切割成4个相等的分区。然后将积木结晶并安装在聚氯乙烯(PVC)管道中。用蒸汽清洗,用5%的氢氟酸蚀刻,冲洗,用或不用硅烷制备。将树脂水泥应用于标准化硅胶管基质内制备的块体,光固化形成每个块体4个树脂水泥样品,每组12个样品(n=12)。用硅烷和不使用硅烷的双固化树脂水泥分别作为阳性对照和阴性对照。取下管子,然后对试样进行500次热循环。试件在万能试验机上垂直加载,施加剪切力直至粘结破坏。计算各组的平均微剪切粘接强度,并采用方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行分析(α =0.05)。试验结束后,对每个试样进行检查以确定破坏模式。结果:除通用键II外,硅烷的应用显著增加了键合强度(pp结论:含硅烷的通用键合剂正在上市,以取代硅烷在胶结前在二硅酸锂凹版表面上的应用。本研究结果表明,以这种方式使用SUAs(除了Universal Bond II)可能会降低二硅酸锂与树脂水泥之间界面的结合强度。关键词:万能粘结剂;硅烷;二硅酸锂;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信