Ultrasound Inversion Imaging Improves the Specificity of BI-RADS Category 4A Masses, Especially in Masses Without Calcification. A Single-Center Experience.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Jiajia Wang, Yunyun Zhan, Yu Bi, Xiabi Wu, Rubing Li, Yunxin Gu, Lan Gao, Tong Tang, Mei Peng
{"title":"Ultrasound Inversion Imaging Improves the Specificity of BI-RADS Category 4A Masses, Especially in Masses Without Calcification. A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Jiajia Wang, Yunyun Zhan, Yu Bi, Xiabi Wu, Rubing Li, Yunxin Gu, Lan Gao, Tong Tang, Mei Peng","doi":"10.1002/jcu.24077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess whether ultrasound inversion imaging enhances the specificity of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) BI-RADS 4A masses, reducing unnecessary biopsies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From July 2021 to March 2023, 425 pathologically confirmed breast masses were collected from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Based on a five-point scale of inversion imaging criteria proposed in a previous study, the diagnostic performance of three classification algorithms, including BI-RADS, BI-RADS category after inversion imaging, and BI-RADS category after inversion imaging without calcification masses-via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 425 breast masses, 116 masses were classified as BI-RADS category 4A (82 benign, 34 malignant). After inversion imaging, 74 benign BI-RADS category 4A masses were correctly downgraded to BI-RADS category 3, avoiding biopsies. ROC curve values indicated that the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were 31.06%, 98.48%, and 72.94%, respectively, with BI-RADS, 72.05%, 95.83%, and 86.82%, respectively, with BI-RADS after inversion imaging, and 86.51%, 97.75%, and 93.09%, respectively, with BI-RADS category after inversion imaging without calcification masses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound inversion imaging offers a feasible supplementary method to distinguish between benign and malignant breast masses, improving BI-RADS 4A specificity, especially for non-calcified masses.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.24077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess whether ultrasound inversion imaging enhances the specificity of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) BI-RADS 4A masses, reducing unnecessary biopsies.

Method: From July 2021 to March 2023, 425 pathologically confirmed breast masses were collected from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Based on a five-point scale of inversion imaging criteria proposed in a previous study, the diagnostic performance of three classification algorithms, including BI-RADS, BI-RADS category after inversion imaging, and BI-RADS category after inversion imaging without calcification masses-via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Among the 425 breast masses, 116 masses were classified as BI-RADS category 4A (82 benign, 34 malignant). After inversion imaging, 74 benign BI-RADS category 4A masses were correctly downgraded to BI-RADS category 3, avoiding biopsies. ROC curve values indicated that the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were 31.06%, 98.48%, and 72.94%, respectively, with BI-RADS, 72.05%, 95.83%, and 86.82%, respectively, with BI-RADS after inversion imaging, and 86.51%, 97.75%, and 93.09%, respectively, with BI-RADS category after inversion imaging without calcification masses.

Conclusion: Ultrasound inversion imaging offers a feasible supplementary method to distinguish between benign and malignant breast masses, improving BI-RADS 4A specificity, especially for non-calcified masses.

超声反转成像提高了BI-RADS 4A类肿块的特异性,特别是在无钙化的肿块中。单中心体验。
目的:本研究旨在评估超声倒置成像是否能增强乳腺成像报告与数据系统(BI-RADS) BI-RADS 4A肿块的特异性,减少不必要的活检。方法:于2021年7月至2023年3月在安徽医科大学第二附属医院收集病理证实的乳腺肿块425例。基于前人提出的反演成像标准五分制,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析BI-RADS、反演成像后BI-RADS分类、无钙化团块反演后BI-RADS分类三种分类算法的诊断性能。结果:425例乳腺肿块中,BI-RADS分级4A级116例,其中良性82例,恶性34例。倒置成像后,74例良性BI-RADS 4A类肿块被正确降级为BI-RADS 3类,避免了活检。ROC曲线值显示,BI-RADS倒置成像后的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为31.06%、98.48%和72.94%,BI-RADS倒置成像后的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为72.05%、95.83%和86.82%,BI-RADS倒置成像后无钙化肿块的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为86.51%、97.75%和93.09%。结论:超声倒置成像为乳腺良恶性肿块鉴别提供了一种可行的辅助方法,提高了BI-RADS 4A特异性,尤其是对非钙化肿块的特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信