Early versus Late Tracheostomy in Critically Injured Burn Survivors: A National, Multi-Database Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jennifer K Shah, Eloise W Stanton, Daniel Najafali, Rahim Nazerali, Clifford C Sheckter
{"title":"Early versus Late Tracheostomy in Critically Injured Burn Survivors: A National, Multi-Database Analysis.","authors":"Jennifer K Shah, Eloise W Stanton, Daniel Najafali, Rahim Nazerali, Clifford C Sheckter","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tracheostomy is indicated in critically ill patients when prolonged mechanical ventilation is anticipated. We leveraged national data to evaluate tracheostomy timing in burn patients, hypothesizing that early tracheostomy would be associated with reduced length of stay (LOS) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Surviving burn encounters undergoing tracheostomy in three national databases-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2016-2021, National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), 2007-2014, and Burn Care Quality Platform (BCQP), 2015-2022-were stratified by tracheostomy timing relative to admission: early: ≤ 10 days versus late: > 10 days. Early tracheostomy encounters were propensity-score-matched with late tracheostomy encounters on age, sex, and total body surface area (TBSA) of burns to evaluate the impact of tracheostomy timing on LOS, ICU LOS, ventilator days, VAP, discharge to inpatient rehabilitation, and discharge to long term acute care (LTAC). 9,173 burn encounters underwent tracheostomy (6,255 in NIS, 1,332 in NTDB, and 1,586 in BCQP) of which 51.1% were early. Within matched cohorts, early tracheostomy was associated with shorter LOS, reported as Average Treatment Effect, in days [95% CI]: NIS: -22.9 [-32.8- -13.1], p<0.01; NTDB: -12.7 [-18.7- -6.8], p<0.01; BCQP: -7.0 [-12.5- -1.5], p<0.01. Early tracheostomy was associated with shorter ICU LOS and fewer ventilator days in NTDB and BCQP (p<0.04). Early tracheostomy was not associated with discharge to inpatient rehabilitation or VAP. Early tracheostomy decreased discharge to LTAC in NTDB and BCQP (p≤0.02). Our multi-database analysis supports early tracheostomy in critically injured burn patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tracheostomy is indicated in critically ill patients when prolonged mechanical ventilation is anticipated. We leveraged national data to evaluate tracheostomy timing in burn patients, hypothesizing that early tracheostomy would be associated with reduced length of stay (LOS) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Surviving burn encounters undergoing tracheostomy in three national databases-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2016-2021, National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), 2007-2014, and Burn Care Quality Platform (BCQP), 2015-2022-were stratified by tracheostomy timing relative to admission: early: ≤ 10 days versus late: > 10 days. Early tracheostomy encounters were propensity-score-matched with late tracheostomy encounters on age, sex, and total body surface area (TBSA) of burns to evaluate the impact of tracheostomy timing on LOS, ICU LOS, ventilator days, VAP, discharge to inpatient rehabilitation, and discharge to long term acute care (LTAC). 9,173 burn encounters underwent tracheostomy (6,255 in NIS, 1,332 in NTDB, and 1,586 in BCQP) of which 51.1% were early. Within matched cohorts, early tracheostomy was associated with shorter LOS, reported as Average Treatment Effect, in days [95% CI]: NIS: -22.9 [-32.8- -13.1], p<0.01; NTDB: -12.7 [-18.7- -6.8], p<0.01; BCQP: -7.0 [-12.5- -1.5], p<0.01. Early tracheostomy was associated with shorter ICU LOS and fewer ventilator days in NTDB and BCQP (p<0.04). Early tracheostomy was not associated with discharge to inpatient rehabilitation or VAP. Early tracheostomy decreased discharge to LTAC in NTDB and BCQP (p≤0.02). Our multi-database analysis supports early tracheostomy in critically injured burn patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.

危重烧伤幸存者早期与晚期气管切开术:一项全国多数据库分析。
气管切开术适用于预期需要长时间机械通气的危重病人。我们利用国家数据来评估烧伤患者气管切开术的时机,假设早期气管切开术与住院时间(LOS)缩短和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)有关。在三个国家数据库(2016-2021年全国住院患者样本(NIS)、2007-2014年国家创伤数据库(NTDB)和2015-2022年烧伤护理质量平台(BCQP))中进行气管切开术的烧伤幸存者按气管切开术时间相对于入院时间进行分层:早期:≤10天,晚期:≤10天。通过年龄、性别、烧伤体表总面积(TBSA)等因素对早期气管造口与晚期气管造口进行倾向评分匹配,评估气管造口时机对LOS、ICU LOS、呼吸机天数、VAP、出院至住院康复和出院至长期急性护理(LTAC)的影响。9173例烧伤患者接受了气管切开术(NIS患者6255例,NTDB患者1332例,BCQP患者1586例),其中51.1%为早期。在匹配的队列中,早期气管切开术与较短的LOS相关,报告为平均治疗效果,以天为单位[95% CI]: NIS: -22.9 [-32.8- -13.1], p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信