A strategic framework for synergizing managed entry agreement efforts to access pharmaceutical products in Saudi Arabia-results from a multi-stakeholder workshop.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2506967
Hussain Abdulrahman Al-Omar, Asma Abdulaziz Almuhsin, Lolwa Hamad Almudaiyan, Amal Hassan Al-Najjar, Laila Carolina Abu Esba, Hind Almodaimegh, Esraa S Altawil, Consuela Cheriece Yousef, Mansoor Ahmed Khan, Khalid AlYahya, Jehan Alamre, Fatma Maraiki, Jaime Espín, Rosanna Tarricone, Panos Kanavos
{"title":"A strategic framework for synergizing managed entry agreement efforts to access pharmaceutical products in Saudi Arabia-results from a multi-stakeholder workshop.","authors":"Hussain Abdulrahman Al-Omar, Asma Abdulaziz Almuhsin, Lolwa Hamad Almudaiyan, Amal Hassan Al-Najjar, Laila Carolina Abu Esba, Hind Almodaimegh, Esraa S Altawil, Consuela Cheriece Yousef, Mansoor Ahmed Khan, Khalid AlYahya, Jehan Alamre, Fatma Maraiki, Jaime Espín, Rosanna Tarricone, Panos Kanavos","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2506967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Managed entry agreements (MEAs) between manufacturers and healthcare payers allow health systems to maximize patients' access to treatments while maintaining financial sustainability. However, to work efficiently, MEAs need to be integrated into a country's formal pricing, reimbursement, and market access processes. This study proposes a country-specific MEA framework for pharmaceutical products and sheds light on the key enablers of optimal implementation of MEAs in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study was conducted through secondary data collection derived from systematic literature search followed by a half-day multi-stakeholder workshop hosted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia including representatives from different governmental, quasi-governmental, and private sectors, all of whom had a job role related to pharmaceutical pricing, reimbursement, and market access. A predefined and validated set of questions was used to guide the workshop discussion with props and prompts to elicit more insights on MEAs design and framework from the participants. The workshop discussion and interactions were digitally recorded to enable verbatim transcription, followed by a thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten themes emerged from the workshop discussion with majority guided the framework design: (1) access to innovative medications; (2) stakeholder views about MEAs; (3) early dialogue; (4) prioritization of MEAs for pharmaceutical products; (5) the regulatory landscape; (6) designing a technical framework for MEAs; (7) innovative payment models; (8) health system governance; (9) challenges for successful implementation; and (10) stakeholder engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Saudi Arabia, MEAs are perceived as strategic levers to enable health system to navigate the access paradox, particularly for innovative and high-cost therapies. Nevertheless, having in place a robust Saudi-specific framework and anchored regulations and policies is essential to ensure that MEAs enhance-rather than compromise-access, sustainability, and equity. As therapies grow more complex, Saudi Arabia must adopt agile, evidence-adaptive MEAs policy and structure to remain fit for purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"753-765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2506967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Managed entry agreements (MEAs) between manufacturers and healthcare payers allow health systems to maximize patients' access to treatments while maintaining financial sustainability. However, to work efficiently, MEAs need to be integrated into a country's formal pricing, reimbursement, and market access processes. This study proposes a country-specific MEA framework for pharmaceutical products and sheds light on the key enablers of optimal implementation of MEAs in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This mixed-methods study was conducted through secondary data collection derived from systematic literature search followed by a half-day multi-stakeholder workshop hosted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia including representatives from different governmental, quasi-governmental, and private sectors, all of whom had a job role related to pharmaceutical pricing, reimbursement, and market access. A predefined and validated set of questions was used to guide the workshop discussion with props and prompts to elicit more insights on MEAs design and framework from the participants. The workshop discussion and interactions were digitally recorded to enable verbatim transcription, followed by a thematic analysis.

Results: Ten themes emerged from the workshop discussion with majority guided the framework design: (1) access to innovative medications; (2) stakeholder views about MEAs; (3) early dialogue; (4) prioritization of MEAs for pharmaceutical products; (5) the regulatory landscape; (6) designing a technical framework for MEAs; (7) innovative payment models; (8) health system governance; (9) challenges for successful implementation; and (10) stakeholder engagement.

Conclusions: In Saudi Arabia, MEAs are perceived as strategic levers to enable health system to navigate the access paradox, particularly for innovative and high-cost therapies. Nevertheless, having in place a robust Saudi-specific framework and anchored regulations and policies is essential to ensure that MEAs enhance-rather than compromise-access, sustainability, and equity. As therapies grow more complex, Saudi Arabia must adopt agile, evidence-adaptive MEAs policy and structure to remain fit for purpose.

为在沙特阿拉伯获取药品而协同管理准入协议努力的战略框架——多方利益攸关方讲习班的成果。
背景:制造商和卫生保健支付方之间的管理准入协议(MEAs)使卫生系统能够最大限度地提高患者获得治疗的机会,同时保持财务可持续性。然而,为了有效地开展工作,多边环境协定需要纳入一个国家的正式定价、报销和市场准入程序。本研究提出了针对药品的具体国家多边环境协定框架,并阐明了在沙特阿拉伯最佳实施多边环境协定的关键推动因素。方法:这项混合方法研究通过系统文献检索获得的二手数据收集进行,随后在沙特阿拉伯利雅得举办了为期半天的多方利益相关者研讨会,包括来自不同政府、准政府和私营部门的代表,他们的工作角色都与药品定价、报销和市场准入有关。一组预先定义并经过验证的问题用于指导研讨会讨论,并提供道具和提示,以从参与者那里获得有关mea设计和框架的更多见解。研讨会的讨论和互动被数字记录下来,以便逐字抄写,然后进行专题分析。结果:研讨会讨论产生了10个主题,大多数主题指导了框架设计:(1)创新药物的可及性;(2)利益相关者对多边环境协定的看法;(3)早期对话;(4)药品多边环境协定的优先次序;(5)监管格局;(6)设计多边环境协定的技术框架;(7)创新支付模式;(8)卫生系统治理;(9)成功实施的挑战;(10)利益相关者参与。结论:在沙特阿拉伯,多边环境协定被视为战略杠杆,使卫生系统能够应对获取悖论,特别是对于创新和高成本疗法。然而,有一个强大的沙特特有的框架和锚定的法规和政策对于确保多边环境协定加强(而不是妥协)获取、可持续性和公平性至关重要。随着治疗方法变得越来越复杂,沙特阿拉伯必须采取灵活的、证据适应性强的多边环境协定政策和结构,以保持适合目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信