Marion Dutkiewicz, Maéva Garros, Julie Bui, Véronique Charlier, Elodie Da Silva, Maryline Lemaire, Sarah Dellière, Anne-Cécile Normand, Renaud Piarroux, Samia Hamane, Théo Ghelfenstein-Ferreira, Alexandre Alanio
{"title":"Comparison of MALDI-TOF MS instruments and databases for the identification of uncommon yeasts, <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. and rare filamentous fungi.","authors":"Marion Dutkiewicz, Maéva Garros, Julie Bui, Véronique Charlier, Elodie Da Silva, Maryline Lemaire, Sarah Dellière, Anne-Cécile Normand, Renaud Piarroux, Samia Hamane, Théo Ghelfenstein-Ferreira, Alexandre Alanio","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01612-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification of uncommon fungi using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF-MS) remains challenging. Its performance depends on the protein extraction method, instrument, algorithm, and database. This study compared two established mass spectrometers (VITEK MS [bioMérieux] and Microflex [Bruker]) to the new VITEK MS PRIME (bioMérieux) and four databases, including MSI-2, a non-commercial database constructed with spectra acquired with Bruker instruments. Isolates of <i>Aspergillus</i> species, rare molds, and uncommon yeasts, previously identified by sequencing, were analyzed. After a two-step protein extraction, MALDI-ToF-MS identification was performed, and spectra were submitted to <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic (IVD) (KB3.2 and KB3.3 [bioMérieux]), research use only (RUO) (FilFungi V5 [Bruker]) databases and MSI-2. A total of 169 isolates (61 <i>Aspergillus</i> spp., 72 rare molds, and 36 uncommon yeasts), representing 33 genera and 96 species, were included. Identification rates at species level for all fungi were similar between VITEK MS and VITEKMS PRIME (79% vs. 77%). The main difference lies in the rates of non-analyzable spectra, being 15% (26 strains) for VITEK MS PRIME versus only 3% (5 strains) for VITEK MS. For <i>Aspergillus</i> and rare molds, MSI-2 performed equally well on VITEK MS and Microflex (92% vs. 91%), indicating a spectra compatibility. For uncommon yeasts, all databases performed equally at the species level. For <i>Aspergillus</i> and rare molds, FilFungi V5 performed poorly (23% and 21%), while MSI-2 was best (77% and 82%) due to broader species coverage. Misidentifications mostly involved cryptic <i>Aspergillus</i> species. MALDI-ToF-MS is a powerful tool for identifying rare fungi. Improvements are needed in completing commercial databases and optimizing acquisition systems for fungal spectra.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF-MS) is key for fungal identification nowadays. We present here the largest comparison of MALDI-ToF-MS instruments and databases focusing on rare yeasts and molds identification, challenging the existing instruments and both commercial and academic databases. The strains were collected in Saint Louis Hospital (Paris) and identified using bar-code sequencing. We showed that commercial databases are efficient for the identification of the main fungal species tested, whereas the academic database outperforms them for the identification of cryptic species.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0161224"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01612-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Identification of uncommon fungi using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF-MS) remains challenging. Its performance depends on the protein extraction method, instrument, algorithm, and database. This study compared two established mass spectrometers (VITEK MS [bioMérieux] and Microflex [Bruker]) to the new VITEK MS PRIME (bioMérieux) and four databases, including MSI-2, a non-commercial database constructed with spectra acquired with Bruker instruments. Isolates of Aspergillus species, rare molds, and uncommon yeasts, previously identified by sequencing, were analyzed. After a two-step protein extraction, MALDI-ToF-MS identification was performed, and spectra were submitted to in vitro diagnostic (IVD) (KB3.2 and KB3.3 [bioMérieux]), research use only (RUO) (FilFungi V5 [Bruker]) databases and MSI-2. A total of 169 isolates (61 Aspergillus spp., 72 rare molds, and 36 uncommon yeasts), representing 33 genera and 96 species, were included. Identification rates at species level for all fungi were similar between VITEK MS and VITEKMS PRIME (79% vs. 77%). The main difference lies in the rates of non-analyzable spectra, being 15% (26 strains) for VITEK MS PRIME versus only 3% (5 strains) for VITEK MS. For Aspergillus and rare molds, MSI-2 performed equally well on VITEK MS and Microflex (92% vs. 91%), indicating a spectra compatibility. For uncommon yeasts, all databases performed equally at the species level. For Aspergillus and rare molds, FilFungi V5 performed poorly (23% and 21%), while MSI-2 was best (77% and 82%) due to broader species coverage. Misidentifications mostly involved cryptic Aspergillus species. MALDI-ToF-MS is a powerful tool for identifying rare fungi. Improvements are needed in completing commercial databases and optimizing acquisition systems for fungal spectra.
Importance: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF-MS) is key for fungal identification nowadays. We present here the largest comparison of MALDI-ToF-MS instruments and databases focusing on rare yeasts and molds identification, challenging the existing instruments and both commercial and academic databases. The strains were collected in Saint Louis Hospital (Paris) and identified using bar-code sequencing. We showed that commercial databases are efficient for the identification of the main fungal species tested, whereas the academic database outperforms them for the identification of cryptic species.
利用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-ToF-MS)鉴定罕见真菌仍然具有挑战性。其性能取决于蛋白质提取方法、仪器、算法和数据库。本研究比较了两种已建立的质谱仪(VITEK MS [biomcamerieux]和Microflex [Bruker])与新的VITEK MS PRIME (biomcamerieux)和四个数据库,包括MSI-2,这是一个由Bruker仪器获得的光谱构建的非商业数据库。分离曲霉种,罕见的霉菌,和不常见的酵母,以前通过测序鉴定,分析。两步蛋白提取后,进行MALDI-ToF-MS鉴定,并将光谱提交体外诊断(IVD) (KB3.2和KB3.3 [biomrieux])、研究用(RUO) (FilFungi V5 [Bruker])数据库和MSI-2。共分离物169株(曲霉61株,稀有霉菌72株,罕见酵母36株),33属96种。在物种水平上,VITEKMS和VITEKMS PRIME对所有真菌的鉴定率相似(79%对77%)。主要区别在于光谱不可分析率,VITEK MS PRIME为15%(26株),而VITEK MS仅为3%(5株)。对于曲霉和罕见霉菌,MSI-2在VITEK MS和Microflex上表现同样良好(92%对91%),表明光谱兼容性。对于不常见的酵母,所有数据库在物种水平上表现相同。对于曲霉和稀有霉菌,FilFungi V5表现较差(23%和21%),而MSI-2表现最好(77%和82%),因为物种覆盖范围更广。误认主要涉及隐曲霉种类。MALDI-ToF-MS是鉴定稀有真菌的有力工具。在完善商业数据库和优化真菌光谱采集系统方面需要改进。重要性:基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-ToF-MS)是当今真菌鉴定的关键。我们在此对MALDI-ToF-MS仪器和数据库进行了最大的比较,重点是稀有酵母和霉菌的鉴定,挑战了现有的仪器和商业和学术数据库。这些菌株收集于圣路易斯医院(巴黎),并使用条形码测序进行鉴定。我们发现商业数据库对主要真菌种类的鉴定是有效的,而学术数据库在鉴定隐种方面优于它们。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.