Mental capacity, insight, and severity of illness in psychiatric in-patients: A prospective study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
N Aman, Swapna A Pandurangi, Pratibha R Kulkarni, Ranganath R Kulkarni
{"title":"Mental capacity, insight, and severity of illness in psychiatric in-patients: A prospective study.","authors":"N Aman, Swapna A Pandurangi, Pratibha R Kulkarni, Ranganath R Kulkarni","doi":"10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_977_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capacity is a dynamic, task-specific, time-specific clinical construct that may be impaired either temporarily or permanently due to the medical or psychiatric illness, necessitating varying degrees of support from caregivers. There is paucity of Indian prospective studies focusing on the mental capacity, insight, and severity of illness (SOI) in psychiatric in-patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The current study aimed to prospectively examine the capacity, insight, and SOI in psychiatric in-patients in a tertiary level psychiatric center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective observational study design was used to assess patient's capacity for making mental healthcare and treatment decisions, insight and SOI using the guidance document, clinical grading of insight and brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), respectively. In-patients aged 18 years and above, any gender and any psychiatric diagnosis as per ICD-11 diagnostic criteria were included, and intellectual developmental disorder was excluded. All assessments were conducted at the time of admission (baseline) and repeated every week until discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 233 in-patients studied, 75% (<i>n</i> = 175) had incapacity and 80% (<i>n</i> = 187) had absent insight at the baseline. Incapacity at baseline was noted in those with delirium, catatonia, BPRS >31 (88%), absent insight (92.6%), and psychotic symptoms (94%). Only 6.42% (<i>n</i> = 12) of cases with the absent insight at baseline had preserved capacity. On repeated measures analysis, those with substance use disorders (SUDs; ≤1 week) and mood disorders regained capacity earlier (1-3 weeks) than psychotic disorders (>3 weeks; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Insight appears to be the best discriminator for capacity status for psychotic disorders, bipolar disorders, and SUDs. Presence of delirium, catatonia, and intoxication reflect obvious lack of capacity; while absent insight, BPRS >31, psychotic and bipolar disorders suggest significant association with incapacity. Effective treatment improves capacity and insight earlier in persons with SUDs and bipolar disorders than psychotic disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":13345,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"67 4","pages":"382-390"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12073952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_977_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Capacity is a dynamic, task-specific, time-specific clinical construct that may be impaired either temporarily or permanently due to the medical or psychiatric illness, necessitating varying degrees of support from caregivers. There is paucity of Indian prospective studies focusing on the mental capacity, insight, and severity of illness (SOI) in psychiatric in-patients.

Aim: The current study aimed to prospectively examine the capacity, insight, and SOI in psychiatric in-patients in a tertiary level psychiatric center.

Materials and methods: A prospective observational study design was used to assess patient's capacity for making mental healthcare and treatment decisions, insight and SOI using the guidance document, clinical grading of insight and brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), respectively. In-patients aged 18 years and above, any gender and any psychiatric diagnosis as per ICD-11 diagnostic criteria were included, and intellectual developmental disorder was excluded. All assessments were conducted at the time of admission (baseline) and repeated every week until discharge.

Results: Of 233 in-patients studied, 75% (n = 175) had incapacity and 80% (n = 187) had absent insight at the baseline. Incapacity at baseline was noted in those with delirium, catatonia, BPRS >31 (88%), absent insight (92.6%), and psychotic symptoms (94%). Only 6.42% (n = 12) of cases with the absent insight at baseline had preserved capacity. On repeated measures analysis, those with substance use disorders (SUDs; ≤1 week) and mood disorders regained capacity earlier (1-3 weeks) than psychotic disorders (>3 weeks; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Insight appears to be the best discriminator for capacity status for psychotic disorders, bipolar disorders, and SUDs. Presence of delirium, catatonia, and intoxication reflect obvious lack of capacity; while absent insight, BPRS >31, psychotic and bipolar disorders suggest significant association with incapacity. Effective treatment improves capacity and insight earlier in persons with SUDs and bipolar disorders than psychotic disorders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

精神科住院病人的心理能力、洞察力和疾病严重程度:一项前瞻性研究。
背景:能力是一个动态的、特定任务的、特定时间的临床结构,它可能因医学或精神疾病而暂时或永久受损,需要照顾者提供不同程度的支持。印度缺乏关注精神科住院患者的心理能力、洞察力和疾病严重程度(SOI)的前瞻性研究。目的:本研究旨在探讨三级精神科住院病人的能力、洞察力和SOI。材料与方法:采用前瞻性观察性研究设计,分别采用指导文件、洞察力临床分级和简短精神病学评定量表(BPRS)评估患者的精神保健和治疗决策能力、洞察力和SOI。住院患者年龄在18岁及以上,任何性别,根据ICD-11诊断标准进行任何精神病诊断,排除智力发育障碍。所有评估在入院时(基线)进行,并每周重复一次,直到出院。结果:在研究的233例住院患者中,75% (n = 175)在基线时丧失行为能力,80% (n = 187)在基线时没有洞察力。谵妄、紧张症、BPRS bbb31(88%)、洞察力缺失(92.6%)和精神病症状(94%)的患者在基线时丧失行为能力。只有6.42% (n = 12)基线时没有洞察力的病例保留了能力。在重复测量分析中,物质使用障碍(sud)患者;(≤1周)和情绪障碍比精神障碍更早(1-3周)恢复能力(1-3周;P < 0.001)。结论:洞察力是精神障碍、双相情感障碍和sud的能力状态的最佳鉴别指标。谵妄、紧张症和中毒的出现反映了明显的能力不足;虽然缺乏洞察力,但BPRS bbb31、精神病和双相情感障碍显示与丧失行为能力有显著关联。有效的治疗可以比精神障碍患者更早地提高sud和双相情感障碍患者的能力和洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Psychiatry
Indian Journal of Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
130
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychiatry (ISSN 0019-5545), is an official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society. It is published Bimonthly with one additional supplement (total 5 issues). The IJP publishes original work in all the fields of psychiatry. All papers are peer-reviewed before publication. The issues are published Bimonthly. An additional supplement is also published annually. Articles can be submitted online from www.journalonweb.com . The journal provides immediate free access to all the published articles. The journal does not charge the authors for submission, processing or publication of the articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信