Evaluating Adherence to Safety Standards for Physical Space Design, Equipment, and Patient and Staff Protection in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Centers: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Amirreza Sadeghinasab, Jafar Fatahiasl, Mahmoud Mohammadi-Sadr, Masoud Heydari Kahkesh, Marziyeh Tahmasbi
{"title":"Evaluating Adherence to Safety Standards for Physical Space Design, Equipment, and Patient and Staff Protection in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Centers: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Amirreza Sadeghinasab, Jafar Fatahiasl, Mahmoud Mohammadi-Sadr, Masoud Heydari Kahkesh, Marziyeh Tahmasbi","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized disease diagnosis and treatment. However, the technology poses safety risks, such as exposure to magnetic fields, RF pulses, and cryogens, necessitating strict adherence to safety protocols to protect patients and healthcare workers. This cross-sectional descriptive study assessed compliance with MRI safety standards in Khuzestan province, Iran) imaging centers, focusing on electromagnetic fields and other key safety domains. A 61-item researcher-developed checklist, based on international safety guidelines, was used to evaluate safety protocols in 11 MRI centers across seven domains, including facility design, equipment labeling, static magnetic and gradient fields, RF waves, cryogens, patient and staff protection, and infection control. MRI staff responded with yes/no answers. Responses to three additional questions also were collected. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Overall, facility design scores ranged from 54.5% to 100%, but static magnetic field safety ratings were significantly lower (25% to 100%). Although safety equipment availability reached 100% in some centers, gaps were noted in labeling ferromagnetic devices. Infection control adherence was high, but only seven centers featured seamless flooring in the magnet room. Cryogen safety showed partial compliance with some centers lacking exhaust fans. Employee and patient safety measures were inconsistent, with one center scoring as low as 18%. While MRI centers demonstrated strengths in infection control and facility design, critical deficiencies in static magnetic field safety and emergency protocols highlight the need for targeted training, regular audits, and updated policies. Addressing these gaps is essential to enhancing MRI safety practices and aligning with international standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized disease diagnosis and treatment. However, the technology poses safety risks, such as exposure to magnetic fields, RF pulses, and cryogens, necessitating strict adherence to safety protocols to protect patients and healthcare workers. This cross-sectional descriptive study assessed compliance with MRI safety standards in Khuzestan province, Iran) imaging centers, focusing on electromagnetic fields and other key safety domains. A 61-item researcher-developed checklist, based on international safety guidelines, was used to evaluate safety protocols in 11 MRI centers across seven domains, including facility design, equipment labeling, static magnetic and gradient fields, RF waves, cryogens, patient and staff protection, and infection control. MRI staff responded with yes/no answers. Responses to three additional questions also were collected. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Overall, facility design scores ranged from 54.5% to 100%, but static magnetic field safety ratings were significantly lower (25% to 100%). Although safety equipment availability reached 100% in some centers, gaps were noted in labeling ferromagnetic devices. Infection control adherence was high, but only seven centers featured seamless flooring in the magnet room. Cryogen safety showed partial compliance with some centers lacking exhaust fans. Employee and patient safety measures were inconsistent, with one center scoring as low as 18%. While MRI centers demonstrated strengths in infection control and facility design, critical deficiencies in static magnetic field safety and emergency protocols highlight the need for targeted training, regular audits, and updated policies. Addressing these gaps is essential to enhancing MRI safety practices and aligning with international standards.

评估磁共振成像中心物理空间设计、设备、患者和工作人员保护的安全标准:一项描述性横断面研究。
摘要:磁共振成像(MRI)已经彻底改变了疾病的诊断和治疗。然而,该技术存在安全风险,例如暴露于磁场、射频脉冲和低温,需要严格遵守安全协议,以保护患者和医护人员。这项横断面描述性研究评估了伊朗胡齐斯坦省(Khuzestan)成像中心对MRI安全标准的遵守情况,重点关注电磁场和其他关键安全领域。根据国际安全指南,研究人员开发了一份61项检查清单,用于评估11个MRI中心的安全协议,涉及七个领域,包括设施设计、设备标签、静态磁场和梯度场、射频波、冷冻、患者和工作人员保护以及感染控制。MRI工作人员的回答是“是”或“不是”。还收集了对另外三个问题的回答。数据分析采用SPSS 26软件。p值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。总体而言,设施设计得分从54.5%到100%不等,但静磁场安全评级明显较低(25%到100%)。虽然一些中心的安全设备利用率达到100%,但在铁磁设备的标记方面存在差距。感染控制的依从性很高,但只有7个中心在磁力室中使用了无缝地板。由于一些中心没有排气扇,制冷机安全性部分符合要求。员工和患者的安全措施不一致,其中一个中心的得分低至18%。虽然核磁共振中心在感染控制和设施设计方面表现出优势,但在静磁场安全和应急方案方面的严重缺陷突出了有针对性的培训、定期审核和更新政策的必要性。解决这些差距对于加强核磁共振安全实践和与国际标准保持一致至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信