Evaluation of Optimal Sequential Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Collaborative Study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Fumihiko Urabe, Kojiro Tashiro, Yu Imai, Kosuke Iwatani, Naoki Uchida, Yuki Taneda, Ken Shibata, Masaki Hashimoto, Shota Kawano, Yuki Takiguchi, Takashi Ohtsuka, Minoru Nakazono, Sotaro Kayano, Mahito Atsuta, Masaya Murakami, Shunsuke Tsuzuki, Toshihiro Yamamoto, Hiroki Yamada, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura
{"title":"Evaluation of Optimal Sequential Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Collaborative Study.","authors":"Fumihiko Urabe, Kojiro Tashiro, Yu Imai, Kosuke Iwatani, Naoki Uchida, Yuki Taneda, Ken Shibata, Masaki Hashimoto, Shota Kawano, Yuki Takiguchi, Takashi Ohtsuka, Minoru Nakazono, Sotaro Kayano, Mahito Atsuta, Masaya Murakami, Shunsuke Tsuzuki, Toshihiro Yamamoto, Hiroki Yamada, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura","doi":"10.1111/iju.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have provided a comprehensive analysis of sequential treatment strategies for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). This study assessed treatment patterns, prognostic factors, and optimal sequencing strategies in patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (1 L-PBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 212 la/mUC patients who initiated 1 L-PBC. Treatment sequences were categorized based on the therapy, including immune-oncology (IO) drug and enfortumab vedotin (EV) therapy. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors for failing to progress to EV therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up duration was 17 months. Of the 212 patients, 65 (38.9%) progressed to EV therapy, achieving the longest median overall survival (OS) of 41 months, compared to 25 months in the 1 L-PBC + IO group and 8 months in the 1 L-PBC group. Poor performance status (ECOG-PS ≥ 1), age ≥ 80 years, and elevated levels of C-reactive protein (≥ 1) were significant predictors of failing to reach EV therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no survival difference based on avelumab use in patients with no risk factors, but patients with one or more risk factors receiving avelumab had significantly longer OS than patients who did not receive avelumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasizes the prognostic importance of achieving EV therapy and the role of maintenance avelumab in improving outcomes for la/mUC patients with one or more risk factors after 1 L-PBC. Combining EV with pembrolizumab is a promising first-line treatment, and 1 L-PBC remains a viable option for selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies have provided a comprehensive analysis of sequential treatment strategies for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). This study assessed treatment patterns, prognostic factors, and optimal sequencing strategies in patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (1 L-PBC).

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 212 la/mUC patients who initiated 1 L-PBC. Treatment sequences were categorized based on the therapy, including immune-oncology (IO) drug and enfortumab vedotin (EV) therapy. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors for failing to progress to EV therapy.

Results: The median follow-up duration was 17 months. Of the 212 patients, 65 (38.9%) progressed to EV therapy, achieving the longest median overall survival (OS) of 41 months, compared to 25 months in the 1 L-PBC + IO group and 8 months in the 1 L-PBC group. Poor performance status (ECOG-PS ≥ 1), age ≥ 80 years, and elevated levels of C-reactive protein (≥ 1) were significant predictors of failing to reach EV therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no survival difference based on avelumab use in patients with no risk factors, but patients with one or more risk factors receiving avelumab had significantly longer OS than patients who did not receive avelumab.

Conclusions: This study emphasizes the prognostic importance of achieving EV therapy and the role of maintenance avelumab in improving outcomes for la/mUC patients with one or more risk factors after 1 L-PBC. Combining EV with pembrolizumab is a promising first-line treatment, and 1 L-PBC remains a viable option for selected patients.

评价一线铂基化疗治疗晚期尿路上皮癌患者的最佳序贯治疗模式和临床结果:一项多中心合作研究
背景:很少有研究对局部晚期和转移性尿路上皮癌(la/mUC)的序贯治疗策略进行全面分析。该研究评估了一线铂类化疗(1 L-PBC)患者的治疗模式、预后因素和最佳测序策略。方法:这项回顾性、多中心研究分析了212例la/mUC患者,他们开始了1例L-PBC。治疗顺序根据治疗进行分类,包括免疫肿瘤(IO)药物和强制维多汀(EV)治疗。多因素logistic回归确定了未能进展到EV治疗的危险因素。结果:中位随访时间为17个月。在212例患者中,65例(38.9%)进展为EV治疗,达到最长中位总生存期(OS) 41个月,而1 L-PBC + IO组为25个月,1 L-PBC组为8个月。表现不佳(ECOG-PS≥1)、年龄≥80岁和c反应蛋白水平升高(≥1)是未能达到EV治疗的重要预测因素。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,在没有危险因素的患者中,使用avelumab没有生存差异,但有一个或多个危险因素的患者接受avelumab的生存期明显长于未接受avelumab的患者。结论:本研究强调了实现EV治疗的预后重要性,以及维护性avelumab在改善1例L-PBC后具有一种或多种危险因素的la/mUC患者预后方面的作用。EV联合派姆单抗是一种很有前景的一线治疗方法,对于选定的患者,1 L-PBC仍然是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信