Long-term outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325107
Jinho Lee, Jung-Min Ahn, Hoyun Kim, Yeonwoo Choi, Sangyong Jo, Do-Yoon Kang, Min-Ju Kim, Seung Ho Hur, Hun-Jun Park, Damras Tresukosol, Woong Chol Kang, Hyuck Moon Kwon, Seung-Woon Rha, Do-Sun Lim, Myung-Ho Jeong, Bong-Ki Lee, He Huang, Young-Hyo Lim, Jang Ho Bae, Byung Ok Kim, Tiong Kiam Ong, Sung Gyun Ahn, Cheol-Hyun Chung, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease.","authors":"Jinho Lee, Jung-Min Ahn, Hoyun Kim, Yeonwoo Choi, Sangyong Jo, Do-Yoon Kang, Min-Ju Kim, Seung Ho Hur, Hun-Jun Park, Damras Tresukosol, Woong Chol Kang, Hyuck Moon Kwon, Seung-Woon Rha, Do-Sun Lim, Myung-Ho Jeong, Bong-Ki Lee, He Huang, Young-Hyo Lim, Jang Ho Bae, Byung Ok Kim, Tiong Kiam Ong, Sung Gyun Ahn, Cheol-Hyun Chung, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve outcomes in complex coronary artery disease compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, long-term comparisons between IVUS-guided PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multivessel disease (MVD) remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post hoc analysis of the Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment Extended Follow-up study included 880 patients with MVD, excluding 15 patients who received medical therapy. Patients were categorised into IVUS-guided PCI (n=333), angiography-guided PCI (n=131) and CABG (n=401). The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target-vessel revascularisation over a median follow-up of 11.8 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IVUS-guided PCI group showed no difference in the primary endpoint compared with CABG (adjusted HR 1.013; 95% CI 0.747 to 1.374; p=0.93). In contrast, angiography-guided PCI was associated with a higher risk of clinical events (adjusted HR 2.231; 95% CI 1.582 to 3.145; p<0.001). The safety endpoint (composite of death, MI and stroke) did not differ between IVUS-guided PCI and CABG (adjusted HR 0.845; 95% CI 0.605 to 1.181; p=0.324), while angiography-guided PCI was associated with a higher risk (adjusted HR 2.016; 95% CI 1.405 to 2.895; p<0.001). Both PCI groups had higher rates of repeat revascularisation compared with CABG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IVUS-guided PCI demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes to CABG in terms of mortality and safety endpoints, supporting its use in the treatment of MVD. These findings highlight the potential benefits of IVUS guidance in complex PCI procedures.</p><p><strong>Trial registration numbers: </strong>NCT05125367 and NCT00997828.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve outcomes in complex coronary artery disease compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, long-term comparisons between IVUS-guided PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multivessel disease (MVD) remain limited.

Methods: This post hoc analysis of the Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment Extended Follow-up study included 880 patients with MVD, excluding 15 patients who received medical therapy. Patients were categorised into IVUS-guided PCI (n=333), angiography-guided PCI (n=131) and CABG (n=401). The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target-vessel revascularisation over a median follow-up of 11.8 years.

Results: The IVUS-guided PCI group showed no difference in the primary endpoint compared with CABG (adjusted HR 1.013; 95% CI 0.747 to 1.374; p=0.93). In contrast, angiography-guided PCI was associated with a higher risk of clinical events (adjusted HR 2.231; 95% CI 1.582 to 3.145; p<0.001). The safety endpoint (composite of death, MI and stroke) did not differ between IVUS-guided PCI and CABG (adjusted HR 0.845; 95% CI 0.605 to 1.181; p=0.324), while angiography-guided PCI was associated with a higher risk (adjusted HR 2.016; 95% CI 1.405 to 2.895; p<0.001). Both PCI groups had higher rates of repeat revascularisation compared with CABG.

Conclusions: IVUS-guided PCI demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes to CABG in terms of mortality and safety endpoints, supporting its use in the treatment of MVD. These findings highlight the potential benefits of IVUS guidance in complex PCI procedures.

Trial registration numbers: NCT05125367 and NCT00997828.

超声引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的远期疗效
背景:与血管造影引导下的PCI相比,血管内超声(IVUS)引导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已被证明可以改善复杂冠状动脉疾病的预后。然而,ivus引导下的PCI和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗多血管疾病(MVD)的长期比较仍然有限。方法:对880例MVD患者进行搭桥手术和依维莫司洗脱支架置入术后的随访分析,排除了15例接受药物治疗的患者。患者分为ivus引导下的PCI(333例)、血管造影引导下的PCI(131例)和CABG(401例)。主要终点为死亡、心肌梗死(MI)或靶血管重建术,中位随访时间为11.8年。结果:ivus引导下PCI组与CABG组在主要终点无差异(调整后HR 1.013;95% CI 0.747 ~ 1.374;p = 0.93)。相比之下,血管造影引导下的PCI与较高的临床事件风险相关(调整后HR 2.231;95% CI 1.582 ~ 3.145;结论:ivus引导下的PCI在死亡率和安全性终点方面与CABG具有可比性,支持其在MVD治疗中的应用。这些发现强调了IVUS指导在复杂PCI手术中的潜在益处。试验注册号:NCT05125367和NCT00997828。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart
Heart 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信