Kinematic effects of sensorimotor foot orthoses on the gait of patients with patellofemoral pain-a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1546821
Steven Simon, Jonas Dully, Oliver Ludwig, Carlo Dindorf, Eva Bartaguiz, Michael Fröhlich, Stephan Becker
{"title":"Kinematic effects of sensorimotor foot orthoses on the gait of patients with patellofemoral pain-a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Steven Simon, Jonas Dully, Oliver Ludwig, Carlo Dindorf, Eva Bartaguiz, Michael Fröhlich, Stephan Becker","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1546821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Foot orthoses (FOs) are a noninvasive and cost-effective medical treatment that positively influence biomechanical factors, such as the kinematics of the lower extremities. Nevertheless, there is a research gap regarding the influence of FOs, particularly sensorimotor foot orthoses (SMFOs), on joint kinematics of the lower extremity in gait. Therefore, this randomized controlled clinical trial addressed the impact of SMFOs on the ankle, knee, and hip joint kinematics of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) in comparison to that of biomechanical foot orthoses (BMFOs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 participants (6 men; 14 women) were part of a three-month intervention with stratified random assignment to custom-made SMFO or BMFO treatment. In the pre- and post-tests, three 12-meter gait walks were assessed by inertial measurement units (IMUs) with the patients wearing no FOs, SMFOs, and BMFOs. For each joint in all three dimensions, three-way repeated-measures statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA)-like statistics. <i>post-hoc</i>, the significant results were checked using <i>post-hoc t</i>-test-like SPMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results show that SMFOs and BMFOs both significantly changed ankle and knee kinematic parameters in patients with PFP in long-term. No significant immediate effects of FOs were detected; however, there were significant interaction effects between the time of measurement and the groups. In the pre-post comparison, the SMFO-treated group showed less dorsiflexion in the initial contact and terminal stance, less knee flexion in the mid stance, terminal stance, and pre-swing, as well as a more neutral knee movement in the frontal plane. The BMFO-treated group showed slightly more knee abduction in the terminal stance, greater knee flexion at initial contact, and less hip adduction at initial contact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the results of this trial support the assumption that temporal adaptation processes play a vital role in the application of custom-made orthopedic FOs and highlight the long-term effects on the kinematics of the lower extremities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1546821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1546821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Foot orthoses (FOs) are a noninvasive and cost-effective medical treatment that positively influence biomechanical factors, such as the kinematics of the lower extremities. Nevertheless, there is a research gap regarding the influence of FOs, particularly sensorimotor foot orthoses (SMFOs), on joint kinematics of the lower extremity in gait. Therefore, this randomized controlled clinical trial addressed the impact of SMFOs on the ankle, knee, and hip joint kinematics of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) in comparison to that of biomechanical foot orthoses (BMFOs).

Methods: A total of 20 participants (6 men; 14 women) were part of a three-month intervention with stratified random assignment to custom-made SMFO or BMFO treatment. In the pre- and post-tests, three 12-meter gait walks were assessed by inertial measurement units (IMUs) with the patients wearing no FOs, SMFOs, and BMFOs. For each joint in all three dimensions, three-way repeated-measures statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA)-like statistics. post-hoc, the significant results were checked using post-hoc t-test-like SPMs.

Results: Results show that SMFOs and BMFOs both significantly changed ankle and knee kinematic parameters in patients with PFP in long-term. No significant immediate effects of FOs were detected; however, there were significant interaction effects between the time of measurement and the groups. In the pre-post comparison, the SMFO-treated group showed less dorsiflexion in the initial contact and terminal stance, less knee flexion in the mid stance, terminal stance, and pre-swing, as well as a more neutral knee movement in the frontal plane. The BMFO-treated group showed slightly more knee abduction in the terminal stance, greater knee flexion at initial contact, and less hip adduction at initial contact.

Conclusions: Overall, the results of this trial support the assumption that temporal adaptation processes play a vital role in the application of custom-made orthopedic FOs and highlight the long-term effects on the kinematics of the lower extremities.

感觉运动足矫形器对髌骨股痛患者步态的运动学影响——一项随机对照试验。
导读:足部矫形器(FOs)是一种非侵入性和成本效益高的医疗方法,可以积极影响生物力学因素,如下肢的运动学。然而,对于足部矫形器,特别是感觉运动足部矫形器(SMFOs)对步态中下肢关节运动学的影响,研究还存在空白。因此,本随机对照临床试验探讨了与生物力学足矫形器(BMFOs)相比,SMFOs对髌骨股痛(PFP)患者的踝关节、膝关节和髋关节运动学的影响。方法:共20例受试者(男性6例;14名妇女)参加了为期三个月的干预,分层随机分配到定制的SMFO或BMFO治疗。在测试前和测试后,通过惯性测量单元(imu)评估了3例12米步态行走,患者不戴FOs, smfo和bmfo。对于所有三个维度的每个关节,使用类似方差分析(ANOVA)的统计数据进行三向重复测量统计参数映射(SPM)。事后,使用类似事后t检验的SPMs检查显著性结果。结果:结果显示smfo和bmfo均能显著改变PFP患者的踝关节和膝关节运动参数。没有检测到FOs的显著直接影响;然而,测量时间与组间存在显著的交互效应。在前后比较中,smfo治疗组在初始接触和终位时的背屈较少,在中位、终位和前摆时的膝关节屈曲较少,并且膝关节在前平面的运动更为中性。bmfo治疗组在终位时膝关节外展稍多,初次接触时膝关节屈曲较大,初次接触时髋关节内收较少。结论:总的来说,本试验的结果支持了这样的假设,即时间适应过程在定制骨科FOs的应用中起着至关重要的作用,并突出了对下肢运动学的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信